If it were an 18 yr old boy and this 15 yr old, what would happen?
Big deal
she’s hot, so Not Guilty ;-)
Equality.
If they’ll put 18-year-old men in jail for screwing a 15-year-old they have to do it to women, too.
Now, should the law be changed for everyone? That’s a different matter all together. But it damn sure shouldn’t be changed only for 18-year-old lesbians.
“the girls were in the same social circle at Sebastian River High School and played together on the basketball team.”
I think I’ve seen this movie.
Equal rights is equal rights.
Equal under the law.
Seriously? You can't make this stuff up!
Translation: My niece should not be held to account for the same laws that apply to all other 18 year old's.
” because she was in a same-sex relationship with a 15-year-old “
The age of consent thing applies even to non-standard-sex people. They want special privileges. Sorry, bub, but a law applies to all or it’s invalid.
The daily news is an illiterate rag.
First thought: I do not support homosexuality Period.
Seconf thought: Many freepers currently freaking out over the age thing better ask granny how old she was when her husband statutorially raped her. Because MANY of the women throughout history were ‘under age’ when they got married. By the modern definition.
Which is the problem with the modern definition.
if her outer body was the teenage boy her inner body is, and she was an adult 18 yr old man bonking a 15 yr old, this wouldnt even be a story
statutory rape
buh bye
If you want to avoid the "creep factor" simply amend the law to allow for a 4-year age difference, for example.
So the parents who want the law enforced out of concern for their child are “bigoted” because the oh-so-modern hyphenated-name mama never bothered teaching her own daughter any boundaries when it comes to sex? I don’t think so.
Well, it’s obvious to me that we’re supposed to be liberal on this case, because it involves a homosexual relationship.
Members of officially recognized grievance groups, such as ethnic minorities and homosexuals, object when the same standards applied to everyone else are applied to them.
So we’re not supposed to say anything. All that matters is that these are girls in a same-sex relationsip. End of discussion, per the liberal and politically correctness crowds.
Equality is a bitch isn’t it.
Young men are presecuted as sex offenders when they are 18 and having sex with a 15 year old girlfriend.
This young woman must face the same laws everyone else faces and under the law she violated an underage girl.
And I will add her mommy's Facebook post shows when it comes to moral vacuity, the apple didn't fall too far from the tree.
There is a Facebook group called "Free Kate." It was an open group earlier today, but now it is closed (I wonder why.). There is also an online petition at Change.org that's dying to be Freeped. Finally, I feel it is my duty to inform you the user allmendream is no more. He was given the ZOT by Jim Robinson earlier today.
It’s a stupid law. 15 year girls are not much less mature than 18 year old females. I’d spot 5 years after the age of 15.
“Should the girls have made better choices, YES. I agree,” Hunt Smith said, “but is this criminal, no.”
Welcome to the world of Big Government, Mr. Smith.
Democrats decided to allow AgencyPersons to decide when a minor could have sex - a decision once largely left to the parents.
Surprise, Surprise, SURPRISE! AgencyPersons and their laws/regulations make a poor substitute for parental judgment.
Turns out there was a reason the Constitution didn’t allow government to raise children.
PS Nathaniel Grigsby ID’ed the Democratic Party as “this party of treason” back in the 19th century. They are the same now.