[Sub-Driver]

What would we do without studies? Who paid for this nonsense...........?

[Yo-Yo]

Bloomberg was RIGHT!

[yldstrk]

OK then, case closed. More people croak from soda pop than from guns.

[TexasFreeper2009]

A sugary drink never killed anyone, period.

This study is crap.

[neodad]

And now that government controls your healthcare...

[Da Coyote]

If something comes out of one of the Harvard Hard Science or Engineering schools - better believe it.

As for their Law, Business, and Health schools - better put on your bull Obama hat.

[the_daug]

Life! 100% fatal.

[Sacajaweau]

Same cr** different day.

Stats are anything you want them to be.

Reality: All people die!!

[TomGuy]

Given enough grant money, researchers can link anything to anything else.

It is all in the technique — and the amount of money they get.

[Night Hides Not]

These researchers must have had deep conversations with Mika Brzezinski...you know, 30-45 seconds.

[Carpe Cerevisi]

I thought it was the sugar from gun shaped Pop Tarts that are the biggest killers.

[OldMissileer]

I really doubt these idiots “tied” anything to drinking soda.

If they ever release their data and methods I doubt they even have a correlation let alone a causation.

[randita]

The study adds to mounting evidence that sugar-sweetened beverages, loaded with calories that carry little nutritional value, are a public health hazard.

If this is the rationale for banning food or drink, what's next?

Pies, cakes, Twinkies, chips, pretzels, crackers, cookies, candy, alcoholic beverages, sweet tea, sweet coffee, yada, yada, yada. None of those have nutritional value.

Why just sugary soda or is this just the camel's nose under the tent?

[muir_redwoods]

So, 1 out of 12,000 of us die from sugary drinks every year. Even if true and accurate, that’s almost a non-existent rate.

[Alex Murphy]

“Human saliva causes cancer, but only when swallowed in small amounts over long periods of time.”

[Doogle]

Singh and colleagues spent five years putting the pieces together

guess all the slots at the global warming scam are all filled up....and who funded their study?

[Democrat_media]

Government paid for this study,

and the media go along with the hoax

just a few examples of recent stories shows that government/socialism doesn't work.
1. government funding global warming hoax for decades
2. gov schools suspending kids for chewing poptarts into “shape of gun”
3. gov raiding people's home because of a pic on the internet of a boy holding a gun
4. 1.5 million $ gov grant to study why lesbians are fatter than gay men
many more

many more

[Democrat_media]

global warming hoax funded by gov ,now more fake but accurate studies to create fake crisis , all meant to take away our liberties one by one till we have none. media and gov tag teaming us

[TomGuy]

I recall a study from several decades ago that cyclamates or maybe it was the saccharine one that using that artificial sweetener would cause cancer.

It was only later that it was revealed that one would have to consume about 800 cans (12-oz) of soda PER DAY for the danger to occur.

But, you can bet, several researchers and their institute(s) got a handful of money to provide the original studies.

[Little Ray]

I will agree that soda-pop is bad. But it’s consumption is none of the Federale’s business.

I wonder if this is part of a set up for lawsuits against “Big Beverage.” They have money, and you can bet the Feds want it...

[sickoflibs]

Cant they declare these sugar sodas a Greenhouse gas and regulate them?