Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2013 4:34:25 PM PST by pacificpundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: pacificpundit

Busted


2 posted on 03/09/2013 4:37:25 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Got a problem? Nothing a drone strike can't fix.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
I just had a background check a few days ago when I went to my local gun store to buy a .45. As I was leaving, I noticed a used AR-15. Bought that too. Even to buy an assault weapon, the background check only takes a matter of minutes. I don't have possession of it yet but I'll be turning it over to the Tucson PD when I do.

I fail to see what he intends to prove. That it only takes a few minutes to fill out the paperwork on a background check?
3 posted on 03/09/2013 4:37:26 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
...he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.

Most child porn addicts usually tell the court that they have it on their computer for "research" purposes only. Kelly is a sleaze.

6 posted on 03/09/2013 4:40:47 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Progressive, Marxist liberals do not evolve, they morph into fascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

Hammers kill more people than “assault Rifles” so it is a good thing he did not buy a hammer.


7 posted on 03/09/2013 4:40:49 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.

Is he admitting to having a criminal background? Otherwise, if his record is clean, then the system worked just fine.

8 posted on 03/09/2013 4:41:09 PM PST by kevao (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
Is this the same Mark E Kelly that's named in the article?
Exactly what did he do where he shouldn't have bought a M4 rifle and a 1911?

To prove what???
10 posted on 03/09/2013 4:46:31 PM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

He is exercising his right to keep and bear arms. Good.


11 posted on 03/09/2013 4:46:43 PM PST by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

They told us the Brady Bill background check was the stringent new law.

Progressive laws always progress to tyranny.


15 posted on 03/09/2013 4:50:37 PM PST by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

Let me get this straight.. We need “more stringent gun laws” so people like him won’t be able to buy them? What is he trying to tell us?


16 posted on 03/09/2013 4:51:09 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
...and a 1911-style semi-automatic pistol ...

He bought a 102 year old pistol? :-)

18 posted on 03/09/2013 4:51:28 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
"What, haven't you seen a hypocrite before?" - Mark Kelly
20 posted on 03/09/2013 4:53:34 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
"Kelly reportedly bought the AR-15 and a 1911-style semi-automatic pistol"

Wise choices. Especially should another 'rat, Jared type, attack.

21 posted on 03/09/2013 4:54:14 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
Mark Kelly should be ashamed anyway...dragging his injured wife around, having her give a painful, pitiful plea to change our Constitution via statute.

There is a constitutional way of changing the Constitution, it is by the amendment process.

If these people succeed in getting the 2nd amendment changed via statute, what in the world will keep some other "aggrieved" group from mounting a successful challenge against ANY other part of the Constitution?

Mr Kelly and Ms Giffords should just stay home, live in peace and let us do the same.

22 posted on 03/09/2013 4:54:19 PM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

So he’s saying that astronauts should be prohibited from buying firearms because they’re unstable?


23 posted on 03/09/2013 4:55:19 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

Even though she’s not in Congress any more, she’s getting a government pension I’m sure (plus disability probably)... so they’re officially part of the “government ruling class” which makes them “special”. They don’t have to live by the same standards we low-life citizens have to adhere to.


27 posted on 03/09/2013 4:57:17 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
Mark E. Kelly, ... recently purchased an AR-15 (an "assault weapon," he called it)—which he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.

Apparently he's a convicted felon or he has been adjudicated mentally incompetent and the NICS check didn't flag him. Sounds like we need better database laws.

28 posted on 03/09/2013 4:57:53 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

What happened to Gabby Giffords was a tragedy. What her husband is doing to her now, dragging her around as a spokespuppet for his political ambitions is an abomination.

When your wife is injured you care for her, not exploit her. Mark Kelly would need years of rehabilitation just to work his way up to flaming POS.


30 posted on 03/09/2013 4:58:11 PM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
Hey Mark Kelly"
31 posted on 03/09/2013 4:59:07 PM PST by real saxophonist (You can't take the sky from me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit
Kelly announced on his Facebook that he was not going to keep the AR-15, which he has yet to pick up from the store.

So he was a straw purchaser?

34 posted on 03/09/2013 5:01:22 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pacificpundit

so is he buying these guns to terrify his disabled wife?

I wouldn’t care if he’s buying it to protect his wife. that would make sense.


37 posted on 03/09/2013 5:01:41 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson