Things could get interesting...
Posted on 02/06/2013 3:53:52 PM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz.
Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Dare we hope?
What the effin difference does it make now? He’s relected and we r stuck this disgusting POS for 4 more years. The way to have forced this issue was for a state - any state, to have passed legislation requiring anyone running on any ballot in any race in that state to provide proof of eligibility to appear on the ballot.
Well WTF does Feinstein have to do with it?
My hope’s not springing, anymore.....
She signed his application to be on the ballot. She affirmed his eligibility.
The key objective at this point in time is to unravel the nest of lies that define Zippy.
One lie is exposed, it leads to the next one, and the next one.
Soon, Zippy will be forced to resign as Americans realize the fraud that he is. there will be other political fallout as well, as those who covered the lies are exposed as well.
If Zippy is not exposed now, this country will implode, on many levels.
The most peaceful path to removal before that happens is to expose the fraud.
And let the fallout be what it needs to be.
Otherwise, enjoy your chains.
“’What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make’ “
.
California Judge Does The Unthinkable: Reinstates 0hbama Eligibility Lawsuit
Ping.
.
My weird fantasy is that this suit will play out favorably, and then ALL laws and EO’s by Obama will be vacated —poof...!
^_^
WHO SAID DAT???
I don’t disagree, but then again I am not exactly optimistic either.
Oh, that someone would have the guts, decency and smarts to expose the threatenings of leftist thugs. They need to tell the world if they are being threatened or even blackmailed, for the good of our Country.
David Keene, NRA President, told the world about his daughter’s and son’s lives being threatened by gun control advocates. Instead of caving, he told the world. Pray for God’s protection of him and his family.
Things could get interesting...
What a wonderful, wonderful fantasy!!! May it quickly become reality, as it well should!
One wonders if she has kids.
I think Georgia was “promised” the dredging of the Savannah Port in return for our “representatives” looking the other way on Bath-House’s eligibility.
Better to have a dredged out port or a collapsed America...
THIS seems too difficult to decide for the children representing us. Throw them ALL out.
you must be a carpenter. hammer meet nail.
I know, I know.
The headline is wrong. The suit was not reinstated.
The trial judge dismissed the suit on a number of grounds, most prominently that plaintiff Orly Taitz never served it on any of the defendants. Orly appealed. The appeal was dismissed because Orly never filled out the paperwork necessary to file the appeal. Orly asked the Court of Appeal to reinstate her appeal. The court gave her more time to file the appeal paperwork.
If Orly gets the paperwork right the second time, the appeal will be reinstated. The underlying lawsuit will not be reinstated unless Orly goes on to win the appeal, which will be hard to do when she never served any of the defendants.
VOTE “Hillery2016”
The big deal is if he is found ineligible every bill xorder is invalidated immediately.
Order Filed: On January 15, 2013, this court filed an order dismissing the instant appeal because of appellant's failure to designate the record on appeal and for failure to file a Civil Case Information Statement, after notice that appellant was in default. On January 24, 2013, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion is defective for the following reasons, among others: 1) The motion purports to include appellant's notice designating the record on appeal but the notice is internally inconsistent in that appellant has failed to indicate which of the alternative methods she elects to use for the record on appeal. Instead, appellant has checked each of the three alternative forms: a clerk's transcript under rule 8.122, an appendix under rule 8.124 and the original superior court file under rule 8.128. Much of the remainder of the document, which consists of handwritten notations, is illegible. 2) The motion purports to include appellant's Case Information Statement, but the Case Information Statement is incomplete. Appellant has failed to complete section A regarding Appealability, section C regarding Bankruptcy or Other Stay, and section E regarding Service Requirements. 3) Appellant's motion to reinstate the appeal does not contain a proper proof of service. The clerk of this court is directed to include with this order a copy of Judicial Council Form APP-009-INFO "Information Sheet for Proof of Service (Court of Appeal)." Specifically, appellant's proof of service by mail on all court documents must include a statement, made under penalty of perjury, by the person doing the serving (who is not a party). Among other requirements, the proof of service also must state the name of the document being served, the server's home or business address, and the city and state from which the document is being mailed. Appellant is advised that this dismissal will become final as to this court on February 14, 2013, at which time this court will lose the power to vacate, reconsider or modify it. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(1).)
I’ve pondered that. It would seem to me that the bills would all still be law by virtue of the fact if not signed or vetoed in N number of days they become law by default. It seems to me that only his vetoes (if any) would be overturned.
But I could be wrong.
Things could get interesting...
Could be very interesting!
Dream on. There are only about 38 Americans left who even know what the fuss is about, or care.
THEY will get to her and her family just like EVERYONE else. People are so clueless (or careless) as to what is going on.
Exactly the reason no judge will ever rule against him. No judge will allow himself to be responsible for that level of disruption and the violent civic chaos to follow. You could offer up a real birth certificate from Kenya with fingerprints and footprints and signed affidavits from the doctor. It wouldn't matter in the slightest.
Never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Why can’t a real attorney, with Orly’s enthusiasm, do things right on this - the most important topic in history?
Seems there were dreamers in 1775 and 1776.
Did Hillary have a face lift while she was having a
“concussion”? She has a he** of a lot less wrinkles than she did just a few months ago.
Thanks for the pings.
I just want the truth. I don’t care by what method or agent it’s exposed.
“What the effin difference does it make now?”
It makes every difference in the world, if it were ultimately successful. It could end up being the best possible outcome. The Federal court decision that Obama was indeed ineligible for the Office would void every bill and law signed into law by the ineligible President and void every appointment made by the ineligible President, including two U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Obamacare would be void, and it would have to be legislated again to become an enforceable law. The executive orders would be voided. How much more can you ask for?
How would Norma McCorvey have felt if the Supreme Court, when hearing Roe v. Wade, said "What difference does it make now? She already had the baby," and decided to not hear the case?
The point is that Constitution issues have to work their way to the Supreme Court regardless of whether or not it's in time for the specific person's specific issue.
-PJ
As can be seen in the judge’s January 15, 2013 dismissal of Orly’s appeal for Orly’s failure to fill out the paperwork properly, the title of this thread is misleadingly incorrect.
There has been NO reinstatement of Orly’s eligibility lawsuit, only a reinstatement of Orly’s APPEAL of the dismissal. The Jan. 15 appeal dismissal would have stood had Orly not corrected all of the deficiencies in her filing of the appeal that the judge noted in comment #23.
Therefore Orly’s underlying eligibility case still stands as dismissed. Only Orly’s appeal dismissal has been reinstated.
Sadly, however, the defects in the underlying case make it almost 100% probable that Orly will lose her reinstated appeal.
A strong shot of Whiskey would do, thank you! On the rocks.
She'll want to run as an incumbent.
Obama impeached.
Biden needs a new Veep.
That would be The Hildabeast.
Biden gets removed per Amendment XXV Section 3 or 4.
Hillary!™ gets two years of unelected presidency, and wants to add two full terms, it will be called The Glorious Hillary!™ Decade...
From the link: "In his latest zany attempt to discredit President Obama's legitimacy to hold office, D.C.'s favorite disbarred lawyer/marijuana activist/crackpot presidential candidate/birther Montgomery Blair Sibley is attempting a new legal strategy: Using defendants and convicts of a 2009 federal anti-fraud law to file court motions to protest their charges because law was signed by someone Sibley believes to not be worthy of serving as president.
Never good when they go all Alinsky on you in the first sentence. Notice how Freed uses the term "worthy" instead of "eligible" in order to put a nice racist spin on things.
She'll probably have even less by 2016.
Thanks for posting this (and trying to out the troll on the other thread), CCPS.
Alright, all you thieving suck-ups out there who got croney-money from the Ole-bomber...give it back.
(a) This is not a federal court case. This is a state court case by Orly Taitz trying to get Obama (and Feinstein) off the California ballot. Since the Senate has already seated Feinstein and the Congress has already accepted California's electoral votes, the case is moot even if Orly gets the appeal reinstated.
(b) Even if a federal court found Obama to be ineligible, the laws he signed and the appointments he made would still stand. Google "de facto officer doctrine."
Back to the drawing board...
So then who would be President? McCain/Palin? Romney/Ryan? Boner?.........(shudder) Pelosi?
Can you imagine how funny it would be if prisons started to let people walk because Obama refused to show his documents? How embarrassing it would be? It's the natural progression of lawlessness. I would love to see a judge with the nuts to start dismissing all these cases! It should be no big deal for a president to show his documents. If im the Judge, they walk if they cant get the documents.
Thanks for the ping.
Continuing to pray.
Miracles still happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.