Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Judge Does The Unthinkable: Reinstates Obama Eligibility Lawsuit
http://www.scribd.com/doc/124071908/Taitz-v-Obama-Judge-O-Leary-s-Order-Reinstating-Obama-Eligibility-Case-2-4-2013 ^

Posted on 02/06/2013 3:53:52 PM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter

Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate Attorney Orly Taitz.

Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; bankoccupied; barry; birftards; cabal; cia; clintonmachine; congress; constitution; davos; eligibility; everyoneknows; fed; fraud; msmlies; naturalborncitizem; naturalborncitizen; nwo; obama; organizedcrime; statedept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-92 next last
This could be the beginning of a whole can of worms being opened for Obama.
1 posted on 02/06/2013 3:54:01 PM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

Dare we hope?


2 posted on 02/06/2013 4:00:16 PM PST by snowtigger (. Thanx to Charlie Daniels, " Let them win, or bring them HOME")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

What the effin difference does it make now? He’s relected and we r stuck this disgusting POS for 4 more years. The way to have forced this issue was for a state - any state, to have passed legislation requiring anyone running on any ballot in any race in that state to provide proof of eligibility to appear on the ballot.


3 posted on 02/06/2013 4:00:16 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

Well WTF does Feinstein have to do with it?


4 posted on 02/06/2013 4:00:27 PM PST by grobdriver (Vivere liberi aut mori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger

My hope’s not springing, anymore.....


5 posted on 02/06/2013 4:03:28 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter
Just like all the other judges who initially recognized the issue as legitimate, this judge will do the same; in few days this judge will have a whole new perspective on the issue and declare it lacks merit. Of course Bruno from Chicago will have first visited this judge but that will never be revealed either.
6 posted on 02/06/2013 4:04:48 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

She signed his application to be on the ballot. She affirmed his eligibility.


7 posted on 02/06/2013 4:06:36 PM PST by snowtigger (. Thanx to Charlie Daniels, " Let them win, or bring them HOME")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wny

The key objective at this point in time is to unravel the nest of lies that define Zippy.

One lie is exposed, it leads to the next one, and the next one.

Soon, Zippy will be forced to resign as Americans realize the fraud that he is. there will be other political fallout as well, as those who covered the lies are exposed as well.

If Zippy is not exposed now, this country will implode, on many levels.

The most peaceful path to removal before that happens is to expose the fraud.

And let the fallout be what it needs to be.

Otherwise, enjoy your chains.


8 posted on 02/06/2013 4:07:17 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

“’What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make’ “


9 posted on 02/06/2013 4:08:57 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter; null and void; MestaMachine; thouworm; Rushmore Rocks; Oorang; ...
*

.

California Judge Does The Unthinkable: Reinstates 0hbama Eligibility Lawsuit

Ping.

.

10 posted on 02/06/2013 4:10:28 PM PST by LucyT (In the 20th century 200 million people were killed by their own governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

My weird fantasy is that this suit will play out favorably, and then ALL laws and EO’s by Obama will be vacated —poof...!

^_^


11 posted on 02/06/2013 4:10:59 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
“’What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make’ “

WHO SAID DAT???

12 posted on 02/06/2013 4:13:36 PM PST by SierraWasp (Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I don’t disagree, but then again I am not exactly optimistic either.


13 posted on 02/06/2013 4:14:54 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Obama has turned America into an aristocracy of the unaccomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

Oh, that someone would have the guts, decency and smarts to expose the threatenings of leftist thugs. They need to tell the world if they are being threatened or even blackmailed, for the good of our Country.
David Keene, NRA President, told the world about his daughter’s and son’s lives being threatened by gun control advocates. Instead of caving, he told the world. Pray for God’s protection of him and his family.


14 posted on 02/06/2013 4:16:20 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

Things could get interesting...

15 posted on 02/06/2013 4:17:28 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

What a wonderful, wonderful fantasy!!! May it quickly become reality, as it well should!


16 posted on 02/06/2013 4:18:22 PM PST by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

One wonders if she has kids.

I think Georgia was “promised” the dredging of the Savannah Port in return for our “representatives” looking the other way on Bath-House’s eligibility.

Better to have a dredged out port or a collapsed America...
THIS seems too difficult to decide for the children representing us. Throw them ALL out.


17 posted on 02/06/2013 4:20:32 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: exit82

you must be a carpenter. hammer meet nail.


18 posted on 02/06/2013 4:22:10 PM PST by sopwith (don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void
Thanks for the Pings.

I know, I know.


19 posted on 02/06/2013 4:28:41 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama": His entire life is Photoshopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter
This could be the beginning of a whole can of worms being opened for Obama.

The headline is wrong. The suit was not reinstated.

The trial judge dismissed the suit on a number of grounds, most prominently that plaintiff Orly Taitz never served it on any of the defendants. Orly appealed. The appeal was dismissed because Orly never filled out the paperwork necessary to file the appeal. Orly asked the Court of Appeal to reinstate her appeal. The court gave her more time to file the appeal paperwork.

If Orly gets the paperwork right the second time, the appeal will be reinstated. The underlying lawsuit will not be reinstated unless Orly goes on to win the appeal, which will be hard to do when she never served any of the defendants.

20 posted on 02/06/2013 4:29:46 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

VOTE “Hillery2016”


21 posted on 02/06/2013 4:33:18 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wny

The big deal is if he is found ineligible every bill xorder is invalidated immediately.


22 posted on 02/06/2013 4:33:25 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter
The prior order in this case read as follows:

Order Filed: On January 15, 2013, this court filed an order dismissing the instant appeal because of appellant's failure to designate the record on appeal and for failure to file a Civil Case Information Statement, after notice that appellant was in default. On January 24, 2013, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion is defective for the following reasons, among others: 1) The motion purports to include appellant's notice designating the record on appeal but the notice is internally inconsistent in that appellant has failed to indicate which of the alternative methods she elects to use for the record on appeal. Instead, appellant has checked each of the three alternative forms: a clerk's transcript under rule 8.122, an appendix under rule 8.124 and the original superior court file under rule 8.128. Much of the remainder of the document, which consists of handwritten notations, is illegible. 2) The motion purports to include appellant's Case Information Statement, but the Case Information Statement is incomplete. Appellant has failed to complete section A regarding Appealability, section C regarding Bankruptcy or Other Stay, and section E regarding Service Requirements. 3) Appellant's motion to reinstate the appeal does not contain a proper proof of service. The clerk of this court is directed to include with this order a copy of Judicial Council Form APP-009-INFO "Information Sheet for Proof of Service (Court of Appeal)." Specifically, appellant's proof of service by mail on all court documents must include a statement, made under penalty of perjury, by the person doing the serving (who is not a party). Among other requirements, the proof of service also must state the name of the document being served, the server's home or business address, and the city and state from which the document is being mailed. Appellant is advised that this dismissal will become final as to this court on February 14, 2013, at which time this court will lose the power to vacate, reconsider or modify it. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(1).)

23 posted on 02/06/2013 4:42:04 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger
Ah.
Perjurer!
24 posted on 02/06/2013 4:47:12 PM PST by grobdriver (Vivere liberi aut mori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I’ve pondered that. It would seem to me that the bills would all still be law by virtue of the fact if not signed or vetoed in N number of days they become law by default. It seems to me that only his vetoes (if any) would be overturned.

But I could be wrong.


25 posted on 02/06/2013 4:59:34 PM PST by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Things could get interesting...


Could be very interesting!


26 posted on 02/06/2013 5:13:01 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great natiorn is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Soon, Zippy will be forced to resign as Americans realize the fraud that he is

Dream on. There are only about 38 Americans left who even know what the fuss is about, or care.

27 posted on 02/06/2013 5:16:26 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger

THEY will get to her and her family just like EVERYONE else. People are so clueless (or careless) as to what is going on.


28 posted on 02/06/2013 5:20:25 PM PST by kneehurts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
The big deal is if he is found ineligible every bill xorder is invalidated immediately.

Exactly the reason no judge will ever rule against him. No judge will allow himself to be responsible for that level of disruption and the violent civic chaos to follow. You could offer up a real birth certificate from Kenya with fingerprints and footprints and signed affidavits from the doctor. It wouldn't matter in the slightest.

29 posted on 02/06/2013 5:22:14 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Why can’t a real attorney, with Orly’s enthusiasm, do things right on this - the most important topic in history?


30 posted on 02/06/2013 5:26:11 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Seems there were dreamers in 1775 and 1776.


31 posted on 02/06/2013 5:28:11 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

http://dcist.com/2013/02/birther_lawyer_attempts_to_recruit.php


32 posted on 02/06/2013 5:28:15 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/02/new-motion-sibley-demands-federal-subpoenas-for-obamas-records-criminal-justice-2454860.html


33 posted on 02/06/2013 5:32:35 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Did Hillary have a face lift while she was having a
“concussion”? She has a he** of a lot less wrinkles than she did just a few months ago.


34 posted on 02/06/2013 5:33:28 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void

Thanks for the pings.

I just want the truth. I don’t care by what method or agent it’s exposed.


35 posted on 02/06/2013 5:34:14 PM PST by AZ .44 MAG (Repeal Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wny

“What the effin difference does it make now?”

It makes every difference in the world, if it were ultimately successful. It could end up being the best possible outcome. The Federal court decision that Obama was indeed ineligible for the Office would void every bill and law signed into law by the ineligible President and void every appointment made by the ineligible President, including two U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Obamacare would be void, and it would have to be legislated again to become an enforceable law. The executive orders would be voided. How much more can you ask for?


36 posted on 02/06/2013 5:36:56 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wny
What the effin difference does it make now?

How would Norma McCorvey have felt if the Supreme Court, when hearing Roe v. Wade, said "What difference does it make now? She already had the baby," and decided to not hear the case?

The point is that Constitution issues have to work their way to the Supreme Court regardless of whether or not it's in time for the specific person's specific issue.

-PJ

37 posted on 02/06/2013 5:37:50 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; LucyT; null and void; Flotsam_Jetsome; Cold Case Posse Supporter

As can be seen in the judge’s January 15, 2013 dismissal of Orly’s appeal for Orly’s failure to fill out the paperwork properly, the title of this thread is misleadingly incorrect.

There has been NO reinstatement of Orly’s eligibility lawsuit, only a reinstatement of Orly’s APPEAL of the dismissal. The Jan. 15 appeal dismissal would have stood had Orly not corrected all of the deficiencies in her filing of the appeal that the judge noted in comment #23.

Therefore Orly’s underlying eligibility case still stands as dismissed. Only Orly’s appeal dismissal has been reinstated.

Sadly, however, the defects in the underlying case make it almost 100% probable that Orly will lose her reinstated appeal.


38 posted on 02/06/2013 5:43:21 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
How much more can you ask for?

A strong shot of Whiskey would do, thank you! On the rocks.


39 posted on 02/06/2013 5:45:31 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
VOTE “Hillery2016”

She'll want to run as an incumbent.

Obama impeached.

Biden needs a new Veep.

That would be The Hildabeast.

Biden gets removed per Amendment XXV Section 3 or 4.

Hillary!™ gets two years of unelected presidency, and wants to add two full terms, it will be called The Glorious Hillary!™ Decade...

40 posted on 02/06/2013 5:46:45 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Hey, PA-R, good to see ya! Hope you and yours are well.

From the link: "In his latest zany attempt to discredit President Obama's legitimacy to hold office, D.C.'s favorite disbarred lawyer/marijuana activist/crackpot presidential candidate/birther Montgomery Blair Sibley is attempting a new legal strategy: Using defendants and convicts of a 2009 federal anti-fraud law to file court motions to protest their charges because law was signed by someone Sibley believes to not be worthy of serving as president.

Never good when they go all Alinsky on you in the first sentence. Notice how Freed uses the term "worthy" instead of "eligible" in order to put a nice racist spin on things.

41 posted on 02/06/2013 5:46:52 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama": His entire life is Photoshopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: calex59
"She has a he** of a lot less wrinkles than she did just a few months ago.

She'll probably have even less by 2016.

42 posted on 02/06/2013 5:48:43 PM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome ("Obama": His entire life is Photoshopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cold Case Posse Supporter

Thanks for posting this (and trying to out the troll on the other thread), CCPS.


43 posted on 02/06/2013 5:49:25 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger
Pelosi signed the one in 2008:


44 posted on 02/06/2013 5:58:03 PM PST by Sarajevo (Don't think for a minute that this excuse for a President has America's best interest in mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
My weird fantasy is that this suit will play out favorably, and then ALL laws and EO’s by Obama will be vacated —poof...!

Alright, all you thieving suck-ups out there who got croney-money from the Ole-bomber...give it back.

45 posted on 02/06/2013 6:04:54 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
The Federal court decision that Obama was indeed ineligible for the Office would void every bill and law signed into law by the ineligible President and void every appointment made by the ineligible President, including two U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Obamacare would be void, and it would have to be legislated again to become an enforceable law. The executive orders would be voided. How much more can you ask for?

(a) This is not a federal court case. This is a state court case by Orly Taitz trying to get Obama (and Feinstein) off the California ballot. Since the Senate has already seated Feinstein and the Congress has already accepted California's electoral votes, the case is moot even if Orly gets the appeal reinstated.

(b) Even if a federal court found Obama to be ineligible, the laws he signed and the appointments he made would still stand. Google "de facto officer doctrine."

46 posted on 02/06/2013 6:06:30 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Back to the drawing board...


47 posted on 02/06/2013 6:09:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower
What a wonderful, wonderful fantasy!!! May it quickly become reality, as it well should!

So then who would be President? McCain/Palin? Romney/Ryan? Boner?.........(shudder) Pelosi?

48 posted on 02/06/2013 6:10:11 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
Hi Flotsam! Thanks for the kind wishes, good to see you around!

Can you imagine how funny it would be if prisons started to let people walk because Obama refused to show his documents? How embarrassing it would be? It's the natural progression of lawlessness. I would love to see a judge with the nuts to start dismissing all these cases! It should be no big deal for a president to show his documents. If im the Judge, they walk if they cant get the documents.

49 posted on 02/06/2013 6:20:48 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks for the ping.

Continuing to pray.

Miracles still happen.


50 posted on 02/06/2013 6:56:11 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson