[AppyPappy]

The attention-whoredom that is homosexuality can survive everything but apathy. Gays will become like the Wiccans. When people are no longer shocked, there won’t be any point in playing Gay.

[Yo-Yo]

The reason why there was no reaction to this news is that everybody's known for decades that Gomer Pyle was gay.

Spoiler alert: So was the first Darren Stephens on Bewitched, and Mike Brady and Alice the maid on Brady Bunch.

[allendale]

Gays can celebrate publicly their lifestyle and “marriages all they want. The bottom line is that they are really quite miserable and unhappy. The queer lifestyle is a curse. Always found it ironic that liberals celebrate Darwin but conveniently ignore Darwinian law when it comes to homosexuality. Darwin rightly observed that unless a trait aids in the propagation of a species, nature has a way of abolishing it.

[shoff]

The Democrats will go back to basics. Claim Republicans are not fit to lead, by pointing to the latest pick for Dept of Defense. Claim they want to starve children by cutting welfare and food stamps. Racist for not supporting SAP (Special access pass) for illegal’s. Hate women by not paying for birth control. Hate minorities by not allowing Obama to do anything about the economy. I could go on, but if you think the liberals will ever run out of excuses for their failures I’ve got a free healthcare system to sell you.

[Mr. Jeeves]

It may be hard to believe for people who didn’t grow up before Nirvana and flannel shirts were things, but once upon a time Republicans could reliably beat Democrats about the head and shoulders with a club labeled “soft on crime.”

And that was a wonderful example of conservatism "winning its way to defeat" - as most of the fascist government overreach we are dealing with today has been a direct result of politicians trying to avoid the "soft on crime" label.

[Vaquero]

Never going to remove all gays. It has been around since forever. It would be nice if it were re-closetized. The blatent flaunting of it is what is sickening and will (is?) tear down western society. People who show pride in this aberrant lifestyle is destroying America. The soviets(now the Russians ) were the ones who pushed this on us as a form of undermining of our society. You may have notice that the Putin administration has criminalized homosexuality in HIS Russia.

Back in the closet with ye, faggots.

[elcid1970]

Didn’t know who Kurt Schlichter is, but I’m going to start reading his stuff.

I was at a Bob Hope USO show in Vietnam & Jim Nabors came on stage. Instantly there was muttering everywhere, “You know he’s a fag, don’t you?”

[driftless2]

Liberals live for causes. They can’t stand normalcy and thrive on disruption. Never underestimate their ability to create a “crisis” usually where the so-called powerful (conservatives of course) are oppressing all sorts of people who don’t deserve being oppressed. They’ll find some phony issue and skewer Republicans. The lib sheep will swallow the new cause hook, line, and sinker.

[Bryan24]

That article is a bunch of hooey.

The culture of the last 300 years in America is dead.

God, Country, Family, Integrity, Morality.... Standards and Ideals that have sustained and built this country are being abandoned, torn down and destroyed.

In their place, the exact opposite...... The ideals of the Democratic Party.

[WashingtonSource]

The fact people voted gay marriage is a bad sign and the author implies that we have to givie up on this front. The same was said by abortion decades and ago and we did not give up and we are slowly winning that argument. I think the same thing can happen with gay marriage. Before Roe v. Wade, several liberal states had liberal abortion laws and the rest did not. There’s no reason to think gay marriage will fare any differently. Opposing gay marriage is vital.

[lurk]

The author seems to assume that collectivists come to a point where they will quit advancing their endgame.

We are far from arriving at their endgame. They will be constantly pushing on the next thing.

[adorno]

It was Bill Clinton, that wily Arkansas politician, who figured out what was remarkably clear to everyone else except his fellow liberals – that criminals were scumbags and the political price of excusing their depredations was not even remotely worth paying.

I have a problem with that statement.

As somebody with a criminal mind himself, Clinton never gave a damn about anybody, and a criminal was just somebody standing in his way, and authorizing an execution was one more step towards realizing his ambitions.

The road to achieving power, is littered with Clinton's victims.

Clinton is the last person to be held up as a crime-fighting politician. He was just as much a criminal as those he authorized to be put to death.

[j_guru]

Well goooooolllllll-laaaaay!

[adorno]

How Liberalism May Win Its Way to Defeat

Sorry, but, liberalism is assured of many victories for many or most future elections.

Crime is not what drives liberals to vote for or against a politicain.

Gay rights is also not the biggest reason that liberals vote for their "favorite" politicians.

Even the right to abortions, is not why liberals vote for their favorite politicians.

What drives people to vote for liberals, is the government funding for the easy and lazy lifestyles that many prefer. When government is in the business of handouts and "free" benefits, at least half of the voters will jump at the opportunity to get their share.

Liberalism is no longer about ideals or the rights of some downtrodden groups. Liberalism nowadays, is about, creating dependency, to assure that, those dependent voters continue electing liberals to power, and power is the only thing that liberal leaders care about, and power is the only means by which they can implement their agenda.

The liberal agenda will have politicians pretending to care about gays and women and blacks and Hispanics and crime and guns, and anything else which will bring them votes. But, those concerns are about as phony as a trillion dollar coin, and it's all intended to gain power. It's the "win at any cost" mantra having come to fruition.

The acceptance of gays everywhere, won't change the fact that, we have created a society where at least half the people have come to depend on government for some sort of government benefit or some "free stuff" from government. That is going to be hard to overcome, and gay acceptance into any political party has nothing to do with winning or losing elections for liberals.

[junta]

Gays might be the last hurrah for white libs, let us be honest the down trodden non-whites and their race politics are not fetching in the least. Beyond the mesiah mulatto teleprompter actor the bench is thin.

[Terry Mross]

Gomer was lucking he had Sgt Carter instead of R. Lee Ermy. “I’m gonna’ cut your ......”

[Georgia Girl 2]

“What difference does it make?”

[chesley]

It’s not about nParty; it’s about Principle.

If the best the Republicans can do is become Democrats on social issues, they won’t hold the line on fiscal issues for long, either. And I, for one, won’t need them.

[x]

How Liberalism May Win Its Way to Defeat

Well, sure, that is what always happens.

Political parties, movements, ideologies go too far and alienate the public, which turns against them.

They can do a lot of damage along the way, though.