Skip to comments.Why Young Women Want AR-15s
Posted on 01/23/2013 6:50:21 PM PST by DogByte6RER
Why Young Women Want AR-15s
Americans have the right to an efficient weapon for home defense.
Sorry, President Obama. As young women, we prefer an AR-15 assault rifle with a 30-round magazine for self-defense.
In fact, we wouldnt want to be stuck at home without one. In the wake of mass murders like Sandy Hook and the horrific rapes and murders of thousands of women each year, pepper spray, mace, or five-round handheld pistols arent going to cut it.
So whats a girl to do? When choosing our tool for home defense, we want the best in accuracy, handling, and aesthetics. The best choice by all three criteria is hands down the AR-15.
AR-15s are the most popular rifle in the U.S.; more than 3 million Americans own one. And its popularity isnt with criminals assault rifles account for only 0.6 percent of murders every year. Rather, the semi-automatic AR-15 is the gun of choice for many hunters, target shooters, and home defenders.
Critics pin the allure of AR-15 on Hollywood (think Angelina Jolies Wait, why do I get the girl gun? in Mr. and Mrs. Smith), video games, and the military, but women especially havent chosen this weapon on a whim.
Our goal when defending against a home invader is simple: to hit where we aim. One shouldnt underestimate the value of target practice, but using an accurate weapon is the key to hitting a target with ease and confidence.
The AR-15 is lightweight and practical. As light as five pounds, it produces low levels of recoil, and its easy to shoot. It also looks intimidating, which is what you want when facing an assailant or intruder. But dont let its appearance intimidate you. Assault rifles such as the AR-15 arent more dangerous, as liberals claim. They dont fire faster than other rifles, and dont normally contain more powerful ammunition.
Accuracy? Check. Ease in handling? Check. Intimidation factor? Check. An AR-15 might be a womans best friend.
We are rational women who, as law-abiding citizens, understand the need and the right to defend ourselves. We dont want to be caught underprepared in the kind of desperate situation that happens too frequently to people across America.
This past week in Georgia, an intruder entered the home of a mother and two children. The mother grabbed her two children and her gun, and proceeded to hide in a crawlspace in the attic. When the intruder entered the attic, the mother fired and hit him with five out of six shots (he still lived).
Imagining ourselves in a high-stress, violent situation, we want a gun with enough ammo, and more, to get the job done. Sometimes, you only get one shot. At other times, you may need more. When you dont have time to reload in the heat of a home invasion, the AR-15s 30-round magazine gives you the flexibility and security a handgun will not.
High-capacity magazines serve as a life-saving insurance mechanism, a self-defense back-up if something doesnt go according to plan. Yet you would never think of these guns in this sense by listening to anti-gun zealots and their allies in media.
Assault rifles and high-capacity magazines have been under fire from our nations legislators since the Newtown massacre. It only took Senator Dianne Feinstein two days to announce her intention to reinstate the Clinton-era assault-weapons ban to get these dangerous weapons of war off our streets. New York governor Andrew Cuomo took it upon himself to make his state the first to tighten gun laws post-Newtown, proudly outlawing magazines over seven rounds because no one needs ten bullets to kill a deer.
Senator Feinstein and Governor Cuomo: We may not need ten bullets to kill a deer, but we sure need them in our own defense. Criminals rarely use assault rifles. Nearly ten times as many murders are committed with hammers and clubs, and 35 times as many with knives. Does that mean we need to ban those too, Senator Feinstein? Banning assault weapons will only take weapons away from my house not from criminals on the street.
Criminals with the intent to harm or kill will always find ways to do so. If they want to kill with an assault rifle or using high-capacity magazines, they will also find a way to do so, regardless of the law. As young, responsible women, we want the ability to defend ourselves against these criminals, and we should be able to do so with weapons of equal or greater power.
Violence is always going to exist. As women, we should possess the right to best defend ourselves against it, whether with a handgun or our much preferred AR-15. So, Mr. President, use the First Amendment as much as you like to rail against our AR-15s, but hands off our Second Amendment right to use them.
Celia Bigelow is the campus director for American Majority Action. Aubrey Blankenship is the communications director for the same organization. Find out more at AmericanMajorityAction.org.
All things considered, I’d rather have an UZI. A little heavier..but no kick. Can field strip it and reassemble blindfolded. And chews through any load without a jam. Loved shooting them.
I had a civvy version of an Uzi, back in the day. I miss that little toy. Wow, did I lose out on a huge gun collection. :(
Nice selection of Tyranny Response Rifles!
Whatever the criminals have, I need more! Plus, if there’s ever a terrorist attack, we need to be prepared. Period!
What are the prices of these?
How do you get an UZI?
I guess I’m getting old, but the first thing I think of when I see some gal posing with an auto loader and showing a lot of cleavage is hot brass.
What an asshat. And I’m not talking about the kid.
I never had any problem with a kick from an M16. Nice little tool, if you ask me. :)
Duh, Communist Tyrant Hussein Obama is always saying “the everybody deserves a fair shot.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.