Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine

I’m finding it difficult to have a discussion about the SH narrative anomalies on FR. Flamers are coming out of the woodwork on every thread like this, each and every time.

Salon headlined their story - Sandy Hook: this man helped save six children, is now getting harassed for it.

My question is...how did he save these six children unless shooting was taking place outside of the school? They may have been running, but the official narrative of the moment says that no one was chasing the children. Hence, he did not save them by inviting them into his house. (Pregnant pause to consider this man inviting anybody else’s children into his house.) And his on-camera delivery could use more polishing. Definitely not ready for prime-time.


32 posted on 01/15/2013 4:59:06 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Resettozero

Why is no one asking why these kids ran PAST the fire station where all the other kids were to his house? Why did no one at the fire station stop them?


34 posted on 01/15/2013 5:06:34 PM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

There was one little boy in that first classroom that grabbed a few of his friends and ran when the shooting started. I’m assuming these were those children. They were all from Vicky Soto’s class.

One of the Dad’s said his son ran from a classroom and took some friends with him. The little boy was six. I’m assuming that it was this group of children and that they made their way to this man’s driveway.


36 posted on 01/15/2013 5:10:57 PM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero

I’m not recommending he be harassed, nor am I willing to endorse the idea that this was a false flag operation, but watching Rosen’s “performance” I can’t help but think something is off-kilter.

He comes across as a drama queen who loves attention and wants to make it all about him. That’s more than a little creepy.

His story doesn’t make sense. Things don’t add up.

His “lines” sound rehearsed. I suppose after he’s told the story multiple times it isn’t surprising that he would use similar phrases, but watching multiple “performances” by him really makes the lines sound rehearsed. Also, I’d expect some modification in his delivery after a while, but with each retelling he had the same overwrought forced weepiness.

I think what strikes me the most is that I would expect some other emotions. If I’d just saved 6 kids lives (not sure that he did, but that’s what people are claiming) from a horrific murder, I would first be shocked, then I’d be angry about the murders of the other children, and then I would be joyful about the 6 I’d saved, and at some point I would probably feel proud that I’d been able to help. None of that from him. Just drama queen weepiness.

I’m not an actor, but I suspect that if I were supposed to act like I was crying over and over for the media, it would come out looking like Rosen. Kind of a fake sounding sad voice, but unable to produce actual tears.

Not saying he’s an actor and this is fake, but I am saying that his “performance” doesn’t ring true.


38 posted on 01/15/2013 5:17:04 PM PST by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson