Skip to comments.
Judge in Gabby Giffords trial calls for assault weapons ban
nydailynews.com ^
| December 21, 2012
| Bill Hutchinson
Posted on 12/21/2012 6:55:00 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: okie01
Of course.
People reach for the safety as a reflex, not knowing that the loss of freedom is the cost. It’s an impulse purchase.
41
posted on
12/21/2012 9:31:00 PM PST
by
lurk
To: SpaceBar
“There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,” - Judge Larry Allan Burns”
We need them to fight tin horn tyrants like this judge.
42
posted on
12/21/2012 9:36:41 PM PST
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
To: Tailgunner Joe; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
If they ban a salt weapons what are we going to use to spice up our food?!
43
posted on
12/21/2012 9:41:57 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: lurk
Once the exchange is complete then the sheeple will realize they have none of both.
But then it will be to late.
44
posted on
12/21/2012 10:03:50 PM PST
by
cableguymn
(The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
To: Tailgunner Joe
To: Tailgunner Joe
""There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," Is there ANY damn leftist in the USA that hasn't uttered those precise words in the last week?
To: LegendHasIt; Tailgunner Joe
""There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," Similarly, there is no reason for liberal judges and their friends to hold wine & cheese parties when beer busts would do just as well.
47
posted on
12/21/2012 10:19:18 PM PST
by
okie01
To: Tailgunner Joe
“Don’t let people who already have them keep them.”
Molon labe.
To: MestaMachine
Judge Larry Allan Burns
Hey Larry!!! shut your stupid Mouth.
49
posted on
12/21/2012 11:25:04 PM PST
by
LtKerst
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
Comment #51 Removed by Moderator
To: Tailgunner Joe
It should be “guns that look like assault weapons” ban. Judges no longer interpret the constitution they pile on an agenda with personal opinions.
To: sergeantdave
long thread......no mention of judge roll killed same day as giffords...???
53
posted on
12/22/2012 4:31:32 AM PST
by
gunnyg
("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Gun control is not about guns, safety, nor the “children”. Gun control is about control! Let me say that again;
Gun control is not about guns, safety, nor the “children”. Gun control is about control!
It's that pesky Constitution thingy again. Those that don't know or understand history are doomed to repeat it. And I'm not even talking about ancient history. We only need to look back less than 100 years.
The real dictators (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pot) first removed guns from their people, then they killed the people, even those that agreed with them. Over 150 million of them in the 20th century.
Wake up Americans. Evil is with us. Adolph Obama is looking for his place in the history books. Unfortunatly no one will be able to read them.
54
posted on
12/22/2012 5:20:59 AM PST
by
Big Mack
(I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat VEGETABLES!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
When did a Glock become an assault weapon.
55
posted on
12/22/2012 9:21:22 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
A Judge is a gear in the machinery of “State Security” make no mistake & have no illusions the judges first loyalty is not to your rights but to the “States “ ability to maintain absolute control. When you look at it from this point of view you understand that the “State” is not your friend but is composed of folks who will if ordered drag you out of your home in the middle of the night & “disappear “ you .
To: Tailgunner Joe
I trust he's finished with the Loghner case? Because he should be, after making such a prejudicial statement. He should not be allowed to hear any cases involving the use of a gun.
57
posted on
12/23/2012 12:39:44 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson