Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge in Gabby Giffords trial calls for assault weapons ban
nydailynews.com ^ | December 21, 2012 | Bill Hutchinson

Posted on 12/21/2012 6:55:00 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

The federal judge who sentenced former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' gunman is advocating a nationwide ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines to take the "mass out of mass shootings." "There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," Judge Larry Allan Burns wrote in Thursday's Los Angeles Times.

Since Jared Lee Loughner killed six people and wounded Giffords with his 31-round magazine Glock pistol, there have been six deadlier mass shootings, Burns wrote.

"But reasonable, good-faith debates have boundaries, and in the debate about guns, a high-capacity magazine has always seemed to me beyond them," he wrote.

He noted that Adam Lanza used a semiautomatic rifle with a 30-round magazine to slaughter 20 first-graders and 6 staffers at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

James Holmes, the accused gunman in the Aurora, Colo., movie theater massacre that left 12 people dead and 58 others wounded, used a rifle with a 100-round drum, he added.

While admitting it might not prevent the next crazed gunman from going on a rampage, Burns said taking away high-capacity magazines could cut down on casualties.

"We might be able to take the 'mass' out of 'mass shooting,' or at least make the perpetrator's job a bit harder," wrote Burns, adding that he is a gun owner and a conservative appointed to the federal bench by former President George W. Bush.

Burns suggested that at a minimum the federal assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 should be brought back "with some teeth this times."

"Ban the manufacture, importation, sale, transfer and possession of both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines," he wrote.

"Don't let people who already have them keep them. Don't let ones that have already been manufactured stay on the market," he suggested, referring to two provisions in the old assault weapons ban. "I don't care whether it's called gun control or a gun ban. I'm for it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; giffords; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: okie01

Of course.

People reach for the safety as a reflex, not knowing that the loss of freedom is the cost. It’s an impulse purchase.


41 posted on 12/21/2012 9:31:00 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

“There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,” - Judge Larry Allan Burns”

We need them to fight tin horn tyrants like this judge.


42 posted on 12/21/2012 9:36:41 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
If they ban a salt weapons what are we going to use to spice up our food?!


43 posted on 12/21/2012 9:41:57 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Once the exchange is complete then the sheeple will realize they have none of both.

But then it will be to late.


44 posted on 12/21/2012 10:03:50 PM PST by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Impeach him


45 posted on 12/21/2012 10:06:51 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
""There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,"

Is there ANY damn leftist in the USA that hasn't uttered those precise words in the last week?

46 posted on 12/21/2012 10:11:33 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt; Tailgunner Joe
""There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,"

Similarly, there is no reason for liberal judges and their friends to hold wine & cheese parties when beer busts would do just as well.

47 posted on 12/21/2012 10:19:18 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“Don’t let people who already have them keep them.”

Molon labe.


48 posted on 12/21/2012 10:26:57 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Judge Larry Allan Burns

Hey Larry!!! shut your stupid Mouth.


49 posted on 12/21/2012 11:25:04 PM PST by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Tailgunner Joe
It should be “guns that look like assault weapons” ban. Judges no longer interpret the constitution they pile on an agenda with personal opinions.
52 posted on 12/22/2012 3:05:03 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Being Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

long thread......no mention of judge roll killed same day as giffords...???


53 posted on 12/22/2012 4:31:32 AM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Gun control is not about guns, safety, nor the “children”. Gun control is about control! Let me say that again;

Gun control is not about guns, safety, nor the “children”. Gun control is about control!

It's that pesky Constitution thingy again. Those that don't know or understand history are doomed to repeat it. And I'm not even talking about ancient history. We only need to look back less than 100 years.

The real dictators (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pot) first removed guns from their people, then they killed the people, even those that agreed with them. Over 150 million of them in the 20th century.

Wake up Americans. Evil is with us. Adolph Obama is looking for his place in the history books. Unfortunatly no one will be able to read them.

54 posted on 12/22/2012 5:20:59 AM PST by Big Mack (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat VEGETABLES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

When did a Glock become an assault weapon.


55 posted on 12/22/2012 9:21:22 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

A Judge is a gear in the machinery of “State Security” make no mistake & have no illusions the judges first loyalty is not to your rights but to the “States “ ability to maintain absolute control. When you look at it from this point of view you understand that the “State” is not your friend but is composed of folks who will if ordered drag you out of your home in the middle of the night & “disappear “ you .


56 posted on 12/23/2012 12:34:30 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I trust he's finished with the Loghner case? Because he should be, after making such a prejudicial statement. He should not be allowed to hear any cases involving the use of a gun.
57 posted on 12/23/2012 12:39:44 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson