Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All Eyez on Him [GQ Interview with Marco Rubio...and the man is GOOD]
GQ [link only!] | December 2012 issue | Michael Hainey

Posted on 11/19/2012 11:24:08 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 next last
To: Kansas58
You have no legal authority at all on your side who disagrees with me.

In fact you have no legal authority that agrees with you, since they refuse to discuss it.

Get over it, just because they refuse to enforce the law doesn’t make you correct.

They easily changed illegal to un-documented, see how easy that was. It is very easy to change Natural Born Citizen to men , oh say, citizen of the world.

141 posted on 11/19/2012 7:17:58 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bereanway

Phulleeeze! Not another old Republican retread! With that stark white head of hair he looks 129 years old! Just what the media needs to be able to laugh him all the way back to the 19th century, where he looks like he came from.


142 posted on 11/19/2012 7:22:20 PM PST by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

you’re right... the founders are dead. just disregard everything they said and why they said it. forget those long dead ideals... best to go with what feels right

seriously, go back to DU if you want to play fast and loose with the Constitution


143 posted on 11/19/2012 7:53:53 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58; exit82
In other words, you have no expert opinion on your side?

He has common sense which seems to completely escape you.

We just went through four years of Romney Pimping, now we have to suffer through four more years of RINO pimping?

Just for laughs, is Obama a Natural Born Citizen? If so what is your proof? Might you think he is NBC because no one has ever challenged his credentials. Judges who declare that not one human in the US has standing do not count.

Give us a break.

144 posted on 11/19/2012 11:17:18 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
They don’t touch it because they don’t want to look like idiots.

Unlike you, who seems to relish in the prospect, of looking like an idiot.

145 posted on 11/19/2012 11:27:00 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"And you think it's a good idea to have the same government that spends every dollar of the Social Security surplus while still calling it a trust fund asset ... have the ability to declare the border secure when it will be nothing close to secure."

You have a very active imagination if you think that is what I said.

"That is the problem now, as it was in 1987. Amnesty is granted but the border security and immigration enforcement never materialize."

Correct. And that is why the border must BE CLOSED (not "declared closed"). One approach to that assurance is that such a determination will be made by the governors of the four states along that border....not the feds. I'm sure there are other acceptable mechanisms to reach the same endpoint.

146 posted on 11/20/2012 4:05:16 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

“For instance, I think the illegal alien “anchor baby” issue can be resolved by Congressional notice of the fact that no United States divorce court would have jurisdiction over custody of a couple’s children, if the husband and wife were not citizens of the United States. Therefore, the child even if born here would not be fully “under the jurisdiction thereof” “

I agree with you on that point. Where would that leave the child of a couple just visiting the US? Would their child be a natural born citizen, then?


147 posted on 11/20/2012 5:03:15 AM PST by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Just happened upon CNN surfing the dial, that rotten girl Solodat Obrien was all excited about the question about the earths age.

I do not think a honest Christian can ever win the White House again,
I really think not.

A honest Christian will be asked to say that his/her Christian faith will not influence his views on abortion, gay marriage and the age of the earth etc

Our only hope is Christ


148 posted on 11/20/2012 6:13:32 AM PST by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

I refuse to vote for anyone who refuses simple scientific facts in order to pander to a particular religious base. We all have our rules here on FR, those are mine.

His answer on the earth’s age was pathetic, embarrassing and childish. “I’m not a scientist, man?” Well, Marco, my 6 year old knows the earth is roughly 4.5 billion years old and can refer you to hundreds of years of science explainin that through facts and evidence.

Ridiculous.


149 posted on 11/20/2012 6:37:36 AM PST by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
And how is it that you think I look like an idiot?

You radical bithers are the folks who can not seem to get a single judge, a single member of Congress, a single Governor, a single election official, a single Constitutional scholar or single immigration attorney or a single historian on your side.

You are wrong. Nobody agrees with you. You have lost the argument, and your argument was very stupid and ignorant to begin with.

150 posted on 11/20/2012 1:03:27 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
You have not one expert on your side.
You have not one elected official on your side.
You are “pimping” a fringe, crack pot theory which has no political or legal support.

And in answer to your question? I do not know about Obama, as I am not positive as to his place of birth, but if Obama was born on US soil, that is all the law requires. However, if Obama was born on foreign soil, his mother was not old enough to pass on citizenship to him.

151 posted on 11/20/2012 1:08:50 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: sten
You are NOT a conservative, as you do NOT base your ideas on anything remotely related to the Founders.

You decided what YOU wanted and you are now trying to twist the law to fit your notions.

The Founders did NOT require that BOTH parents be US Citizens. The founders only required that one be a citizen at the moment of birth for that person to become President. Those rules can change under the Constitution and they have changed several times.

All that the Constitution requires is that POTUS was a citizen at the time of birth under the rules in force at that time.

152 posted on 11/20/2012 1:15:17 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Well it would be silly for me to argue/discuss this further, but respected Christian Theologians would differ with you.

The theory of evolution for instance as far as I am concerned, is a lie from the pit of hell.

Was only a theory by a guy, possibly 2, that has now been blindly accepted by the masses

Most are basing there belief on carbon dating, very questionable

Also dont forget it`s the same “scientists” that believe in global warming that believe in all this nonsense

And NO the dinosaurs do not end the story, they just have the dating wrong

It`s what I believe, as well as Christian Theologians, notice I said Christian Theologians

I respect your right to believe as you do, nevertheless


153 posted on 11/20/2012 3:49:28 PM PST by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

yup... you’re unhinged

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

sorry... is that inconvenient for you? is it too complicated? do you need it broken down into smaller words?

ok:

a natural born citizen who is a citizen naturally... as there are no alternatives

only those trying to deceive would confuse such a simple thing


154 posted on 11/20/2012 5:39:26 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: sten; All
Here is where you FAIL:

LOGIC!

To say that it was “never doubted” that a set of facts produced a known outcome, IE, Natural Born Citizenship, does NOT, in any way, exclude other sets of facts whioh can and do ALSO produce Natural Born Citizenship.

As a Citizen can be born abroad, of two citizen parents (depending on the laws at the time of birth) and as a Citizen can also be born on US soil -— You fail in English and in Logic and at law.

Try this:

“it has never been doubted that a red barn is a barn”

Does this statement mean that all barns must be red?

Of course not!

You birthers are a joke, nobody with any legal understanding agrees with you.

You have not one single expert on your side.

NOT ONE!

Why is that?

155 posted on 11/20/2012 7:17:51 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

not one... except for a supreme court justice.

you, you have ... well, nothing. just the desire to get your guy onto the ballot, even though he’s not eligible.

keep ranting, lib troll. you only make yourself more obvious


156 posted on 11/21/2012 1:35:16 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: sten

If you are popped out on US soil, that makes you both a US citizen and a natural-born citizen. Try to find any legal citation that says otherwise.


157 posted on 11/21/2012 5:22:13 AM PST by teflon9 (Political campaigns should follow Johnny Mercer's advice--Accentuate the positive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: teflon9
wrong if a mother from another country, like mexico, runs across the border and pops the kid out... the kid, having 2 mexican parents, would be a US citizen AND a mexican citizen but... since there is more then one choice... he would not be a natural born citizen, just a US citizen if what you suggest would be enough, then foreign royalty could give birth in the US ... and the kid could be king of as well as POTUS... a situation the founders were strictly against and was the main reason they entered the 'natural born' adjective
158 posted on 11/21/2012 7:31:22 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: teflon9

wrong

if a mother from another country, like mexico, runs across the border and pops the kid out... the kid, having 2 mexican parents, would be a US citizen AND a mexican citizen

but... since there is more then one choice... he would not be a natural born citizen, just a US citizen

if what you suggest would be enough, then foreign royalty could give birth in the US ... and the kid could be king of [name country] as well as POTUS... a situation the founders were strictly against and was the main reason they entered the ‘natural born’ adjective

** edited for formatting


159 posted on 11/21/2012 7:32:56 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: sten
You do NOT have any Supreme Court decisions on your side.

You do NOT have any Supreme Court justices on your side

YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO READ!

That a particular set of facts was affirmed as meeting the requirements for a Natural Born Citizen does not, in any way, deny that another set of facts might not qualify the same requirements.

All Red Barns are Red.

All Red Barns are Barns.

Not every barn is red.

Not everything that is red is a barn.

You do not understnad basic logic and you do not understand the English language.

You have absolutley no clue how to read a legal decision.

You are wrong, and this is why you have absolutely nobody of any importance on your side.

160 posted on 11/21/2012 4:02:18 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson