Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLibZone

Maybe he got it exactly right, but failed to take into account Democrat election fraud?


3 posted on 11/07/2012 3:16:43 PM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthurio

The other polls turned out to be more realistic in the ginned up D vote.


5 posted on 11/07/2012 3:21:52 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

Absolutely, I’m sure they stole minimum 5 million votes - in the right places - to steal the election. Never can be convinced otherwise.


11 posted on 11/07/2012 3:27:39 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright ("DONE: The GOP Establishment Has Now Lost 2 In a Row")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

I honestly think it’s to the point where they just phone in phony numbers. Most polls had Romney up and up big in FL & VA. No one lookd at all surprised when that went to Obama.

And the big thing for me is that they’re saying the Republicans stayed home, didn’t turn out. I just flat out don’t believe that. If anyone stayed home it was Dems.


12 posted on 11/07/2012 3:38:32 PM PST by Kenny (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio
Maybe he got it exactly right, but failed to take into account Democrat election fraud?

I don't discount that as a possibility. I don't think, even from the very start of his regime, 0bama felt he could win re-election without cheating, and I don't think he expected to win even up until yesterday. The electronic voting machines in use by most states are ripe for fraud. They can be programmed to do virtually anything.

You have to ask yourself, with the Country in such sad shape and with 0bama having absolutely nothing to run on, how did he achieve such a victory?

13 posted on 11/07/2012 3:39:58 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Never Underestimate the Power of Evil or Evil Doers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio; P-Marlowe; Yashcheritsiy

Election fraud?

Rush Limbaugh rejected that explanation today. He basically said it was impossible to prove and there were other reasons that better explained the loss.

His explantion? America now numbers more takers than contributors.

I hope that Rasmussen wasn’t being political just to curry favor. I don’t want my intel section to be giving out soothing info. What could conservative workers have done if they knew that the obama minions were turning out in smaller numbers than previously, but still pretty large?

The RNC deserves a hit here because it shouldn’t matter which candidate wins a primary for them to know they should be setting up campaign centers throughout America’s precincts.

That strikes me as just about the only legitimate reason something like a republican national committe would have to exist. Their job should be sinking their organizational teeth into America’s precincts. Other than being a traffic cop, I really don’t see how it’s their business to be controlling who the candidates are. For every Akin horror story you tell, I’ll tell a Tommy Thompson story. One made a “right wing” misstep and lost. Apparently, the other lost, too, without a misstep. Which is actually worse?


16 posted on 11/07/2012 4:11:37 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio
Maybe he got it exactly right, but failed to take into account Democrat election fraud?

My thoughts exactly!

It's hard to statistically account for massive election fraud.

24 posted on 11/08/2012 6:43:39 AM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson