[SoftwareEngineer]

Commentary by Scott:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

[ConservativeInPA]

[outofstyle]

I think the poll is accurate. But I don’t think it changes anything. The”the Rally Around the Flag effect” of Sandy has changed the answers of some poll responders. But I don’t see those people as ever really going to the polls on Tuesday anyway.

[Arm_Bears]

Axelrod put the arm on Rasmussen.

[JediJones]

I don't understand this line by Scott. I think he's making an error of omission.

If Romney can win the Badger State [Wisconsin] after losing Ohio, he would still need to win Colorado and either Iowa or Nevada to win the election.

He's leaving out New Hampshire as a way for Romney to win. Romney can win Wisconsin, Colorado and New Hampshire to get to 271. Iowa or Nevada can be substituted for New Hampshire. That also seems to me to be Romney's easiest path to victory. That would mean winning 5 of the 8 remaining swing states on Scott's list (CO, WI, NH, VA and FL) and losing OH, IA and NV.

[Tennessean4Bush]

Crap

[rwfromkansas]

Okay, this is the first poll that really, really concerns me.

That said, I still think we win with turnout.

But, forget 330 EV.

I just hope we can snag 300 if we are lucky, more likely less.