Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Obama choose to “stand down” in Benghazi? (Best explanation of motive I've read.)
PowerLine ^ | October 27, 2012 | Paul Mirengoff

Posted on 10/28/2012 8:11:58 AM PDT by StandAndDeliver1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
The authors is evenhanded, and goes step by step to the unavoidable conclusion that, at the least, we now have enough info to "present a serious indictment of Obama".
1 posted on 10/28/2012 8:12:05 AM PDT by StandAndDeliver1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

The unavoidable conclusion is that Obama is a pussy and a coward, and unfit to hold office as Command in Chief.


2 posted on 10/28/2012 8:16:00 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party of No! Nobama, No Way, No How!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

The unavoidable conclusion is that Obama is a pussy and a coward, and unfit to hold office as Commander in Chief.


3 posted on 10/28/2012 8:16:20 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party of No! Nobama, No Way, No How!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
Photobucket
4 posted on 10/28/2012 8:17:35 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

It was Valerie Jarrett, she would only pull the trigger on a repub.


5 posted on 10/28/2012 8:20:07 AM PDT by DCmarcher-976453
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

The best military leaders know when to take risks. War is constant risk, there is no absolute guarantees. The best military leaders have faith in their soldiers and their abilities.

A poor politician seeks to avoid risk and never trusts those not under their direct control.

In summary, I think it was a politician making a political decision based on their desire to win an election.

Benghazi is where Obama the man met Obama the myth and came up short.


6 posted on 10/28/2012 8:20:30 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

When you cut through all the Bull**** it’s simple. If Obama’s daughters were in that Annex help would have been sent. Regretfully, it was other people’s sons.


7 posted on 10/28/2012 8:21:15 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

They knew Al Queda was behind the attack. Obama has been saying “I killed Bin Laden and Al Queda is crippled”. Fighting Al Queda in Benghazi on 9/11 didn’t fit his re-election scenario.


8 posted on 10/28/2012 8:21:17 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

When the enemy is foreign and armed, Barry is risk averse. And he thought he was avoiding a Desert One right before an election. The wild-card was the diary, the internet and a very few MSM presstitutes who couldn’t any longer stomach covering up for the Diversity Prez.


9 posted on 10/28/2012 8:22:25 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
The authors is evenhanded, and goes step by step to the unavoidable conclusion that, at the least, we now have enough info to "present a serious indictment of Obama".

BULLSHIT!!

The authors are giving him a pass or at least the "benefit" of the doubt, which based upon the info available, I am not willing to do so.

Also, based upon what has been leaked re: the raid to get Bin Laden it is said he was not willing to take a chance to (as reported his Consiglieri, the Commie Bitch, Jarrett advised against) "offend" the Moose-Limbs and it that action was taken without his approval.

Likewise, I'm willing to bet the same thing happened here; that the Islamic-Appeasing-Defender-Supporting "Hussein" was afraid that we might anger or offend his "buds" the Jihadists who are apparently now in power/control of Libya and consciously decided to let those people twist in the wind.

10 posted on 10/28/2012 8:23:45 AM PDT by neveralib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
I believe that the action was vetoed based on political/election consequences, undoubtedly by Valerie Jarrett.
11 posted on 10/28/2012 8:24:58 AM PDT by oldbrowser (An empty chair attracts a stadium full of empty chairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
The attacks began at 3:30 DC time, read somewhere that when Obama got the initial call on Benghazi he was on the golf course.

If that is true then how long did it take him to get to the situation room after the call? What hole was he on and did he finish his round before returning to the WH?

12 posted on 10/28/2012 8:25:54 AM PDT by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
One story has two UAV’s overhead. Another has two SEALS one marking a target with laser and rescuing one dead SEAL. There was radio, telephone traffic, and classified top level communication. The pResident decided to hang the ambassador out to dry along with the rest of the staff.
13 posted on 10/28/2012 8:26:21 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

This is the problem with instantaneous communications. If the local security was the responsibility of the local commander instead of some faceless bureaucrat in Washington then the situation might have been much better handled. Instead, the buck got passed until it got to somebody more concerned about getting elected than saving American lives.

It would be much better to give rules of engagement to the local commander (in Italy, it looks like) and let him make the call. BTW, you almost always commit troops with an incomplete picture of what’s happening on the ground. You rely on them to make things go your way once they arrive and if they need help they’ll tell you how much and where.


14 posted on 10/28/2012 8:27:04 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

TWA800 in the run-up to Bubba’s re-election —spontaneous center fuel tank detonation....?

REALLY...?


15 posted on 10/28/2012 8:27:59 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

I think I’ll go watch ‘Black Hawk Down’.


16 posted on 10/28/2012 8:28:07 AM PDT by Frapster (There you go again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

“Commander-in-Chief”?This man doesn’t even know when to go to The Toilet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 10/28/2012 8:28:31 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
I think we are giving Obama too much leeway. The Ambassador should have been pulled out of there weeks ago, or had never been placed there.

He wasn't given requested security and basically was hung out to dry. He was sent to the enemy walls and then his support order to retreat and leave him standing.

Our CIA/SEALS with "CUE BALLS" had to go against White house orders not to go save the Ambassador.

It is clear to me that the Ambassador was meant to be captured. It is an incredible statement, but it really is the only plausible conclusion.

18 posted on 10/28/2012 8:28:35 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (christian.bahits.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Yup...this has Valerie Jarrett stink all over it...


19 posted on 10/28/2012 8:29:46 AM PDT by Popman (November 7th...will be a good day for America..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1
Or maybe it was a set up.

Terrorists attack Embassy,kidnap Ambassador,obama gets him freed before election day.

20 posted on 10/28/2012 8:31:13 AM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson