It is EXTREMELY important strategically that Romney STAY OUT of the whole Libya mess now. If he says anything about it, there will be no end to increasing polarization. Any sound byte would be about Romney vs Obama, instead of Obama vs America’s military/diplomatic corps. The best way for him to gain relative stature, and for America to hear the truth about Libya, is for the process that is underway to proceed without Obama and the Dems being able to claim that he “is politicizing Benghazi”.
As hard as it is, Romney must say NOTHING about it as much as humanly possible, for him to get maximum traction from it.
Exactly. I never heard or said one byte about him not saying anything. In fact his not saying anything reveals that he will NOT LEAK info or use our military as political pawns. I simply acknowledged that he had intel. Period.
That looks to be his plan for now. Romney is looking less like a pantywaist and more of a strategist for not pressing Obama on Libya in the final debate. Was he tipped off? Did he just have a hunch? Whatever the reason, I think he knows what to do.
And he can certainly afford to avoid talking about Libya since the economy is his greatest selling point with voters. Focus on the economy, let the scandal blow up, and then ride the backlash all the way to the White House.
I agree.
However, the PACs should be blasting The Disaster with ads in every swing state esp. Wis, Mich, Pa and Ohio.
Make the Enemamedia show ads detailing what we know so far: deriliction of duty, inability to decide, the Video Lie, the begging for more security, desertion for fund raising, etc.
It is not a short list.