[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

This has the clip from the debate with Candy interrupting....then her appearance on CNN and finally a Foxnews Focus Group of about 10 people that absolutely could not agree on much of anything....Megyn had her hands full.

Talk about people being confused.

This is not even close to being over......

[generally]

Personally, I think it was way beyond media bias. I think it was collusion with the 0bama campaign.

Re-Watch the debate when this occurs. 0bama says something like “Proceed, governor” and looks smug. Check out the body language. Then compare to the rest of the debate where he tried to talk over Romney, argued with him, or accused him of lying. Compare to the rest of the debate where he was not content to just sit back and listen while Romney spoke.

Why didn’t he do that in this instance? Because it was a trap that the Democrats and the media set for Romney and he wanted Romney to walk all the way into it.

How convenient that Crowley just happened to have the answer that 0bama needed! Would she have been able to produce the record of any other speech that quickly?

Anyone else think this was planned and rehearsed?

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

Look, the Muslim in the White House cringes at the very thought of saying ‘terrorist attack’. He simply will not do it when the offenders are Muslims. Romney screwed up when he said ‘act of terror’; He should look Obama in the eye and say “Why can’t you call a terrorist attack a terrorist attack?.. To date you STILL have not called what happened in Benghazi a terrorist attack!! You even labeled the shooting at Ft. Hood by a killer shouting ‘Allah Akbar’ as ‘Workplace violence’.. Who are you trying to protect, Mr. President? Let’s hear you say it just this ONCE.. America’s still waiting..”

[Conservative4Ever]

In a time long ago, Ms candy would be unemployed today for her job performance from last night.

[Seaplaner]

Just as with Mister Rather and his never-to-be-forgotten forged documents, one suspects that Ms. Crowley will never live her deliberate debate cheating down.

Question, would "whore" be too strong a term to describe her political activist immoderation?

.

[Revolting cat!]

“Collusion”, “conspiracy”, give it a rest! There was neither. It is worse, much worse. It is a conspiracy of minds, and has always been such. They don’t have to collude when they already think alike. As for sweet Candy, she’s a professional, she prepared, and she anticipated Romney’s attack, which wasn’t hard to do, and she was ready to defend her hero of radiant socialist future.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

From the comments at Hot Air:

*******************************EXCERPT******************************************

How did Crowley know to have the Rose Garden transcript in front of her? How did Obama know she would have them to check?

John the Libertarian on October 17, 2012 at 10:58 PM

And the clincher: Why did Obama not even hesitate before saying, “Get the Transcript?” Is he usually so quick on his feet? If you’ve been watching the debates and seeing how long it takes him to answer a question, you know better.

When I first heard hints of collusion, it sounded like a conspiracy theory. Watching it live the first time, it looked plausible. But when you watch it again, you notice:

1) When he makes the claim that everyone immediately recognizes as false, that he identified the Benghazi attack as an act of terrorism immediately, and Romney started to challenge him, Obama didn’t even look concerned that he might have made a mistake. He already knew how the whole thing was going to play out.

2) When Romney twice says, “Are you sure you want to claim that?” Obama still doesn’t look a bit worried. He tells Romney to “proceed.” Quite obviously, he knew what was coming and was anxious to finish it.

3) When Romney finally says outright that Obama did NOT identify it as an act of terror in the Rose Garden, Obama immediately says, “Get the transcript.” Obviously, he didn’t have to ask if the transcript was available. He knew it was right there waiting for him.

4) When Crowley reads from the transcript (out of context), Obama is immediately and smugly telling her to say it again. Obviously, he knew exactly what was coming.

Conclusion: Romney was sandbagged. And he was sandbagged because Crowley and Obama colluded.

At this point, it’s not just a conspiracy theory. It’s obvious.

tom on October 18, 2012 at 12:51 AM

Candy Crowey is a huge Obama fan!

Crowley is a big Obama supporter, but then again, she was big enough to admit she was wrong.

petunia on October 18, 2012 at 12:57 AM

Now we know who drank all the sugary kook aid!

petunia on October 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM

Kool aid… sorry.

Crowley was the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room and the elephant in the corner!

petunia on October 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM

It seems odder still that she had the transcript at the ready, and Obama apparently knew it, too, since he asked her to check it. Almost as though it had been planned. And Michelle applauded when they pulled it off.

Midas on October 17, 2012 at 10:35 PM

I’ve been tweeting this all day! If you listen he turned to her and said read it candy. So how did he know she had it? Of course they conferred & it was obvious she was a shill 4 the chicago thug! I am SO SICK of the left msm doing all the debates! Was poor widdle 0 afwaid to debate with a real moderator? And then poor widdle 0′s wife had to make sure she led the clapping even though they had agreed not to clap. Did widdle candy say anything? Nope! Did she throw kisses to michelle?
You can see I’m digressing into a 3rd grader!

Sorry, this sounds co-ordinated between the President and Crowley. Honestly, it came off perfectly and it would seem that the President and his team had prior knowledge of Romney’s attack…weird that Crowley had the fact check in front of her!!!

allstonian on October 17, 2012 at 11:44 PM

Even though the fact check was wrong!

Then they ignore all of 0′s supporter’s death threats against Romney!

Bambi on October 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM

Ok.. there wasn’t a two faced lying leftb wing douchebag on that panel, who shouldn’t have been shaken like a rat.

“Romney has never been held to account for his lies”?

An actual educated human said that,.. when the entire media minus FOX has been desperately trying to shovel dirt on the grave of his candidacy since the start..

The idiot left on that panel were outraged, they got called out for rigging the debate..

again.. the left cheats..

always..

They can’t even have a friendly game of catch with their kids, without tripping them… and throwing elbows like the thugs they are..

I have a lot of democrat friends.. and not one single progg.. or far left liberal.. because they’re not the kind of people anyone can trust,.. rank and file democrats, get misinformed, lied too.. and haven’t learned yet how badly they’re exploited..

Hopefully with that demagogue Obama gone.. the democrats will be able to yank their party back towards the center,, and away from the lunatic left.

mark81150 on October 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM

It’s a little sad that liberals think so lowly of their politicians, particularly their black ones, that they feel they have to constantly help, cheat, thumb the scales for, and tell lies in order to help out their fellow leftists. It’s the soft bigotry of low expectations. I mean, if a liberal politician was all that and a bag o’ chips, then there would be no need for all this help from the likes of Candy Crowley.

ted c on October 18, 2012 at 1:03 AM

Comment pages: « Previous 1 2

You must be logged in and have JavaScript enabled to post a comment.

Logged in as . Log out »

[Casie]

[stanne]

OB cannot be dealt with on the facts, he doesn’t live in the real world. And his followers, these people and a lot of the power people that the Republican Stupid A$$ Committee allowed to run ALL of the debates, Candy Crowley (and Bob Scheiffer sp?) do NOT see yet, if they ever will, that the Emperor has no clothes.

This is NOT politics. It’s a lot more like a Shakespearean political drama.

Romney and his people better catch on to that quick or next week he’ll get behind.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

“True story: An apolitical friend surprised me today by launching into a two-pronged tirade about the debate.”

I guess that makes the guy his apoplectic apolitical friend.

[petercooper]

bttt

[The SISU kid]

BTTT