Skip to comments.Iran Has Obama in a Headlock
Posted on 09/13/2012 1:18:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Iran's Armageddon cult now has Obama at its mercy. After appeasing the sadistic regime in Tehran for almost four years Obama only has to make it through the next two months without the MiddleEast blowing up, and he's set for life. This is the last electoral test of his career, and maybe also the first real election he's ever had to endure.
Obama's political bind puts the mullahs in charge for the next two months, rushing to an irreversible grab for nuclear weapons.Obama will not do anything to stop them, because that would mean taking a career risk. He has never taken a risk that might endanger his political career. Never.
As a result, the UnitedStates has all the capability for destroying Iranian nuclear weapons before they break out, but we won't use our might, because Obama cares about himself more than the safety of the world. Israel is a pawn in this game, but the real stakes are the Muslim Ascendancy -- world power for the rising nuclear caliphates of the Muslim Middle East: Egypt,Turkey and Iran.
Israel is the scapegoat for a rising great power struggle, in which the left has taken sides against civilization. If that seems harsh, read Paul Johnson's life of Winston Churchill or Niall Ferguson's fine book Civilization:The West and the Rest --- and you see it happening again, right in front of our eyes. The Russians, the Muslims and the Chinese read history. Liberals don't read history, because they prefer to live in delusion. It's a choice.
....This is the Carter-Reagan election of 1980, where we barely escaped Jimmy Carter's "declinism" by the skin of our teeth. It's the Chamberlain-Churchill struggle that saved Britain from the Nazis,after dreadful suffering. It's the surrender of the Sudetenland to Hitler, and the Yalta surrender to Stalin....
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
...it’s easy when you bend over
....”More questions ensued as Obama’s speech progressed. Why does he refuse to even acknowledge that the attackers are religionists, or more specifically, Islamists — or even more specifically and correctly, Islamic terrorists? He refused to identify the enemy beyond a vague assumption that they are a small, radical group. Rather, he takes the moment to assuage American concerns about Libya, claiming that “the attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya,” going so far as saying that concerned Libyans carried Ambassador Stevens to the hospital, “where he later died.”
Ambassador Stevens died at the hospital? Prior to his speech, Americans had seen these pictures of Stevens’ corpse being carried in the streets. Did the “good” Libyans rob his corpse from the hospital morgue and take it to the streets? Was the president simply mistaken, and did he mean to say they carried his corpse to the hospital? Is this a lie? And most importantly, why is it even being addressed in this setting, if not meant to whitewash American impressions of Libya in the wake of an attack made by Libyans, against Americans, and on American soil?
Rather than lay down a gauntlet to our enemies that have committed an act of war, Obama seemed to be defending his administration’s support of the Libyan uprising. His opponents have been vocal about the shrouded and potentially nefarious elements that could seize influence in the vacuum left by Gaddafi’s regime in Libya. These attacks prove that those elements are indeed a significant threat, and this speech seemed directed at downplaying that threat. At a time when we needed the president to tell the world that aggression against America will not be tolerated for any reason, he chose to give another lecture about religious tolerance and how a few rotten Islamist apples won’t spoil the barrel.
We mourn for the four Americans murdered in this heinous attack, and for the attack on our sovereignty. But with that sadness, there is no pride beyond the memory of the pride felt eleven years ago— a pride that was solidified by a leader with the resolve to identify our enemy, look him in the eye, and tell him that he is targeted for his crimes. Barack Obama is not that leader, and I have never been so ashamed to call someone my nation’s representative as I now feel about him in his response to these attacks.”.....
He seems to be taking it well.
0bama sent a letter to Tehran assuring them that the U.S. will do nothing to help Israel taking that off of the table removing a big worry for them that might have made them think twice. Iran is good to go now with 0bama's blessing.
"Just a few days after the anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will travel to New York City. Once he arrives he will be handed a platform to incite violence and hostility from the center of the UN universe, just a few miles from Ground Zero."
Anything for the New Caliphate.
The world's not better off Sept 11, 2012
[Muslim Brotherhood] ........."These rabid and avowed Islamists are perfectly prepared to use violence think Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhoods Palestinian franchise when they believe it will conduce to success.
Until that time, shariah requires its adherents to pursue the same goals through means that are best described as pre-violent, rather than non-violent. And it is the steady progress that the prime practitioners of this approach which the Brotherhood calls civilization jihad have made unnoticed, or at least un-countered, by President Obama and his subordinates that has actually made the world vastly more dangerous than it was when they came to office.
Just how dangerous may be on display when President Obama hosts Mohamed Morsi. It will be interesting to see whether he emboldens that Islamist, as he has others, by bowing to him. But what will be far more important than such symbolic gestures is what further concessions Mr. Obama offer, concessions that according to the doctrine of shariah are interpreted as tangible signs of our submission?
One that will be at the top of Mr. Morsis agenda is his demand that the United States release one of the most worlds most dangerous jihadists, Omar Abdul Rahman. Better known as the Blind Sheikh, this terrorist was convicted of leading, among other conspiracies, the first, lethal attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. Presumably, President Obama would not dare pardon or transfer Abdul Rahman to Egypt before his last election, but he may feel free to do so afterwards when he has, in his words, more flexibility.
Either way, the Morsi visit will be a teachable moment for every American. All other things being equal, it will demonstrate tangibly that eleven years after 9/11 notwithstanding the tactical successes achieved by our courageous servicemen and women, lethal drones and intelligence and homeland security professionals, we are losing, not winning, the war against those who are driven by shariah to wage jihad, of either the violent or stealthy kind, against us. We better pray it will prompt the American people to insist on a fundamental course correction two months from now."
November cannot come soon enough - America needs to slam the door on this groveling boot-licker appeaser.
Only one end of it...
Didja ever try to get one of these new TVs to work; without having the correct remote?
Money quote. Obama has been supporting the Muslim Brotherhood from the moment he walked into the White House, and they have reciprocated by murdering our ambassador in a carefully-planned assault.
And this morning it's happening again in Yemen. This is not an accident.
They won't need it, to deliver us a half-dozen Nork nukes in Hanjin shipping containers.
Also, Hillary Clinton and her long-term adviser Huma Abedin......
Bill and Hillary and Huma and Anthony..............."In fact, working with Hillary's State Department, Obama has helped to install the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and throughout the Middle East, using the "Arab Spring" turmoil to empower these sworn America-haters.
And now here comes the icing on the treachery cake: Obama and Hillary reportedly have informed Iran that they've abandoned Israel, leaving the only Jewish State to face a nuclear Iran alone. How proud the Abedin family must be of their little girl!".......
As soon as Syria falls, King Abdullah of Jordan is going to have a gun pointed right at his head. He's ex-Sandhurst and has got to be a pretty motivated guy, on the subject of defeating the Salafists and Shiite fuzzy-wuzzies.
BTW, my thinking about the BC stuff has changed .... I think it's only 50/50 that he's even a legal U.S. citizen. I think he held his Indonesian passport into his 20's, which is a citizenship election under U.S. law, which would make him Indonesian not U.S. citizen. I always suspected that might be the case, since I found out his mom spent the rest of her life in Jakarta as an Indonesian citizen herself, working her social-anthropology gig.
Bammy wants the Muslims to rise, thus all the recent events are best understood by realizing Bammy wants thte Muslims to win over America.
Yes, Bammy is treason on two feet. So is any Muslim.
Why are Muslims treason on two feet? Because Islam is antithetical to America AND Islam is irreconcilable with Islam.
Use our nuclear advantage while we still have it.
Obama is like a guy sent to prison for the first time and he doesn’t know that he has a full body tattoo of of a fashion model on his back.
[Iran Has Obama in a Headlock]
That’s a hug gone bad.
Have you seen this? Be prepared to feel outraged:
UNREAL Obama Invites Egypts Muslim Brotherhood President to Meet Next Week Refuses to Meet Netanyahu...
“The Muslims have made this war. It’s Americans’ right and duty to finish it.”
I have heard about that. Thank you for the ping and the link. That is one more dot connected contributing to my suspicion that 0bama is intentionally inflaming and aiding the Muslim world to rise up against Israel. Right now.