Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eastman Kodak to cut more jobs
Reuters ^ | 10 Sep 2012 | Unattributed

Posted on 09/10/2012 4:30:41 PM PDT by BfloGuy

Bankrupt Eastman Kodak Co said it will cut 1,000 additional jobs by the end of this year and may cut more as it focuses on its commercial packaging and printing business.

Kodak, which invented the digital camera but had trouble adjusting to the digital age, was betting on an auction of its 1,100 patents to raise funds to repay money borrowed to finance its bankruptcy.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: layoffs; technologykodak
Kodak's employee base has shrunk to about 17,100 at the end of last year from about 145,000 during the 1980s.

In the '80's, friends of mine from Rochester felt pretty superior to us poor folks from Buffalo. The steel plants had closed down and Buffalo was reeling, while "high-tech" Rochester (home to Kodak and Xerox) was booming.

But in the last decade, both Kodak and Xerox made themselves the steel industry of the 21st century. I'm not at all gloating over it; it's a shame. Business is tough. You can't rest for a minute.

1 posted on 09/10/2012 4:30:45 PM PDT by BfloGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
Just more fodder for CNN to gloat about an 0bama reelection.
2 posted on 09/10/2012 4:35:02 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I am surprised these announcements are coming before the election


3 posted on 09/10/2012 4:36:03 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"I am surprised these announcements are coming before the election."

Not if they want to sell their employee votes to Obama for rescue bucks.

4 posted on 09/10/2012 4:44:33 PM PDT by Average Al (The Democrat party is a free range zoo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
gotta say though, they did it to themselves...
5 posted on 09/10/2012 4:45:38 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Hopefully this next layoff is at the manufacturing plants that Kodak built in China.


6 posted on 09/10/2012 4:52:45 PM PDT by P3_Acoustic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I lived in Syracuse for the same period and there was a certian “attitude” about Rocha-cha-cha.

It’s the 585’er mentality.

Yet, I came to Kodak in the mid 2000’s to try and resurrect a former giant. Things were too entrenched from the “glory days” and they simply would not yield in the manner in which they conducted business to the new world they were operating in. They we also deeply committed to “diversity”.


7 posted on 09/10/2012 5:00:38 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
Yet, I came to Kodak in the mid 2000’s to try and resurrect a former giant.

Back then, Forbes would have assigned 9 figures to the value of the "Kodak" name and trade dress. Kind of telling how even that "capital" can disappear.

For as much as we denigrate California here on FR, they continue to produce new companies from nothing. Some from left wing connection, but many or most from a fairly level playing field.

Sure, they end up outsourcing much of their operations to the other states and overseas, but alot of money is still made here.

8 posted on 09/10/2012 5:16:29 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I know what you mean. As a vendor I met with senior execs in their Canadian operation with a proposal for them to match the incentives that Fuji and Konica were offering retailers. Marketing and Finance loved the concept but the discussion was shut down by the IT manager who asserted that their systems could not accommodate it (my proposal was a way to MAKE their systems handle it).


9 posted on 09/10/2012 5:22:26 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Tories in- now the REAL work begins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

In the executive suites they simply had a “don’t rock the boat” mentality. Many of the senior managment simply wanted to get through their final years and then it wouldn’t be their problem.

The old boys had no clue as to how fast the digital technology was moving. They simp0ly could not see a PC going from $4000 for a 386-8MHZ with 1 Mb of RAM and 320 Mb HDD to 15 years later you could buy a 3GHz P4 dual core with 4 Gb of RAM, and 160Gb HDD for $500.

A decision was made to sell off the core businesses (Eastman Chemical), copiers to Danka, and blood anayzers to J&J, Aerospace to ITT, and Health to Onyx.

What’s left....Digital Cameras? Yes they had the best image processing and took the best pictures, but mechanically they were crap. Personal Printers? Nice ink, but mechanically they were crap. Commercial Printing? HP and Pitney Bowes are burying them in the commercial billing printing market.

Film? Yes the EKTAR 100 Film is the best yet for film photography but I may take two or three rolls of film per year in my Canon F-1n. The camera in my iPhone takes acceptable pictures for 99.999% of the time I want to take a photo.

Antonio Perez is a “closer”....His job it to dispose of the assets, minimize the liabilities, and turn out the lights.


10 posted on 09/10/2012 5:57:06 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I was at Kodak when the decision was made to resist the switch to consumer digital imaging because retailers threatened to drop Kodak products if they did. Drugstores etc relied on the 3-visit model (customer came to store to buy film, to drop off film, then to pick up prints). Kodak lost sight of who the customer was, and so lost the opportunity in the sudden transition to digital. I suggested the ultimate implementation of Eastmans’s “you push the button, we do the rest” line (auto transmit digital image by integrated cell phone, prints get mailed to customer) but as a mere peon was ignored.


11 posted on 09/10/2012 6:38:37 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Typical 315er.... Rocha cha was 716 in the 80’s 8-)


12 posted on 09/10/2012 7:32:49 PM PDT by Joshua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
386-8MHZ

Now don't get carried away here. The original 80386 went at 16 Mhz, and I think the Zenith Luncht Box style unit went at 12 Mhz for heat/interference reasons, but none of them went only 8Mhz.
13 posted on 09/10/2012 7:41:14 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I have a new zest for life!"--Calvin from Las Vegas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

With the rapid decline in film sales due to digital photography, I wonder why Obama hasn’t tried to bail out Kodak.


14 posted on 09/10/2012 8:23:03 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
He could bail out Kodak and we will all be riding trains and taking pictures with film cameras that are powered by solar cells which also run the air conditioning in our GM Volts with the bike rack on the back on our way to get some good obama-care at the local school health center, unless we are 68, where we will be issued our happy-sleepy pill and our bodies returned to the earth which continues to see the sea levels drop and the air become cleaner as Hussein breathes in and out...
15 posted on 09/10/2012 8:39:22 PM PDT by Chickensoup (STOP The Great O-ppression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson