Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thune Called Romney's 'Sleeper' VP Pick
Newsmax ^ | June 11, 2012

Posted on 08/07/2012 6:18:59 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: q_an_a
name two vp before Klinton.

John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Aaron Burr

Oh, you meant before Bill Clinton?

Dan Quayle, Spiro Agnew, Richard Nixon, Walter Mondale, hmmm.....

61 posted on 08/08/2012 2:29:00 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

>> Outside of Chaney or GHW Bush - name two vp before Klinton.

Figure you’d go for broke on the spelling?


62 posted on 08/08/2012 2:32:16 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

I completely agree. West would be an outstanding pick.


63 posted on 08/08/2012 2:35:24 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He’s my choice but I doubt he’ll be picked!


64 posted on 08/08/2012 3:58:59 AM PDT by Cricket24 (Telling the truth is not attacking someone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He’s my choice but I doubt he’ll be picked!


65 posted on 08/08/2012 3:59:10 AM PDT by Cricket24 (Telling the truth is not attacking someone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Rubio would solidify the hispanic vote. and for the most part is a solid conservative....

I would suggest Palin again, but you dont do veep twice once your McLame loses...she would be a great presidential candidate(how about a push at the convention folks) but her Veep time is over....


66 posted on 08/08/2012 5:16:58 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2

Where do you folks get the silly notion that the parents must be born here?

Nonsense!


67 posted on 08/08/2012 5:46:21 AM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

EVERYone has been called his “sleeper pick”! I’m sure he’ll pick someone ever bit as boring as he is. Meh...


68 posted on 08/08/2012 6:00:56 AM PDT by luvie (Never forget...WE have THEM surrounded! ~ Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

If you notice the guys everyone can name Johnson and Ford...they became presidents because of bad luck i.e. Kennedy and Nixon. But the idea of bringing someone into the VP slot who would be a good leader in 8 years is stupid. GHW Bush ran close to Regean and was an easy choice to carry on, but Rubio or any of the Young Guns still need some results.


69 posted on 08/08/2012 10:05:22 AM PDT by q_an_a (the more laws the less justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Where do you get the idea that it is a notion that parents must be born here? No such limited notion is proposed by persons holding to the Constitution. The crux of eligibility for POTUSA is that parents have to be Citizens of the USA. The Founding Fathers realized there had to be some element of dedicated/established loyalty to the USA by the parents. This is not a silly requirement even though it it is not a guarantee against someone like Axelrod becoming eligible. Nonsense you say? I have a different value for the Constitutional history.


70 posted on 08/08/2012 11:56:20 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2

You seemed to have omitted the quote from the Constitution...

“The crux of eligibility for POTUSA is that parents have to be Citizens of the USA.”


71 posted on 08/08/2012 12:31:33 PM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun

Romney Veepstakes

NO
Condoleeza Rice
John Thune
Jeb Bush
Kay Bailey Hutchison
Olympia Snowe
Luis Fortuño
Rick Perry
Ron Paul
John McCain
Donald Trump
Colin Powell
Newt Gingrich
Jon Huntsman
Scott Brown


72 posted on 08/08/2012 2:49:46 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

NO
Willard


73 posted on 08/08/2012 3:16:04 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

A Romney/Romney from ten years ago ticket would be superlame


74 posted on 08/09/2012 12:11:43 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

Palin made me happier to vote for McPain.

But in hindsight it shouldn’t have mattered. As VP she either would have been the loyal trooper or else been frozen out, either way irrelevant.

I don’t think anyone McPain could have picked would have changed my vote to 3P other than maybe LIARMAN, what a disaster that would have been.


75 posted on 08/09/2012 12:17:24 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj
Yeah, I was discussing veep choices and didn't list Romney because he's not going to be picked for veep in 2012. :-p

But if the 2002 Romney was a veep choice, he'd also be unacceptable

2002 Thune would be okay though, he was a fairly decent Congressman but turned out to be a dud in the Senate.

Hey, as long as we're on this, can I bring back the 1998 Bob Barr forward in a time machine so he can beat the crap out of his 2012 counterpart? ("Look, just shut up, you ACLU whore!") I'd pay money to see that. ;-)


76 posted on 08/09/2012 2:26:17 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson