Skip to comments.
Burn Down the Suburbs?
National Review Online ^
| August 1, 2012
| Stanley Kurtz
Posted on 08/01/2012 11:02:25 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Noumenon
I was just about to “ping” you to that post ... turns out it’s not necessary.
41
posted on
08/01/2012 1:12:53 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Melas
From the file name, looks like Pruitt.
42
posted on
08/01/2012 1:15:39 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: livius
The only GOP candidate who promised to revoke US participation in or any support for Agenda 21 was Gingrich. Which is not to say that he would have ended Federal support for all of its tenets, which, from what I know of Newtie's record on environmental issues, is unlikely.
44
posted on
08/01/2012 1:17:13 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
To: Carry_Okie
Post 43, by me, is in error.
My apologies to the forum.
45
posted on
08/01/2012 1:18:51 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
To: Carry_Okie
I think so. He actually revised his view on a lot of the so-called environmental issues after he seriously started running for president and examined the issues.
Anybody know what Romney (who is a statist at heart) thinks about Agenda 21?
46
posted on
08/01/2012 1:20:23 PM PDT
by
livius
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Over their dead bodies. That's a better idea.
47
posted on
08/01/2012 1:30:08 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(I will not pay the Obama jizya.)
To: stevie_d_64
I actually love cities, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with apartment living, and I wouldn’t want to live in a suburb. But that’s my personal choice, and I don’t know why it enrages Obama so that some people prefer suburban living.
The problem with these apartment buildings near you is not necessarily that they’re apartments but that they are being pushed on the neighborhood by the government and the government is picking their tenants. The government has destroyed many city neighborhoods by doing exactly this same thing.
Of course, the government officials in question, ranging from Obama to judge Leonard Sands of New York, don’t live in either suburbs or cities: they live in mansions and gated communities, like Party leaders in any Marxist country.
48
posted on
08/01/2012 1:31:10 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Argus
That needs to be shouted:
In a speech December 1929 Stalin said: We have passed from a policy of confining the exploiting tendencies of the Kulaks to a policy of liquidation of the Kulaks as a class
*We* are the Kulaks. 0bama is Stalin.
49
posted on
08/01/2012 1:41:36 PM PDT
by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: livius
50
posted on
08/01/2012 2:21:40 PM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
To: livius
Go into any of the major cities in first world Asia (Tokyo, Osaka, Singapore or even Taipei or Seoul) and the city centers are some of the most attractive places there are. One thing they all have in common is very low tolerance for crime. Further, political corruption, while it undeniably exists, it absolutely pales in comparison to even a somewhat respectable mid-sized city in the United States (Pittsburgh, for example).
51
posted on
08/01/2012 2:52:29 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: neverdem
"The centerpiece of the Obama administrations anti-suburban plans is a little-known and seemingly modest program called the Sustainable Communities Initiative."
That's already implemented in some of the most remote and unpopulated counties in the country. It's supported by state and local government employees and their NIMBY, pensioner friends of both political parties in the names of "property values," "open space," etc--even in counties that have vast majorities of Republicans.
IMO, nearly all who receive incomes that allow enough money and time to engage in politics are dishonest, hardened socialists. We lack manufacturing production (especially new small shops outlawed under zoning regs.) and real private sector representation (excludes services with mostly government employees and pensioners as customers). Have fun. Enjoy the slide.
52
posted on
08/01/2012 4:32:09 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: neverdem
“One approach is to force suburban residents into densely packed cities..”
As the son of a Warsaw Ghetto survivor, the idea of packing people into cities should be a great danger sign. No, I’m not saying that they’re planning to send everyone to the gas chambers, just that this level of central planning of people’s lives has a tyrannical notion of absolute power to control people, to herd them wherever you want...
53
posted on
08/01/2012 4:57:51 PM PDT
by
JewishRighter
(Anybody but Hussein)
To: mountainlion
“UN Agenda 21”
I guess we can say that until we’re blue in the face. I work with a guy that always goes there.
Guess what. People yawn and try to figure out if they have a meeting in 5 minutes. IT MEANS NOTHING - except to some Ron Paul people in the know. In other words, no one, at all, gets persuaded, at all.
54
posted on
08/01/2012 5:14:48 PM PDT
by
BobL
(Cruz'd to Victory - July 31, 2012)
To: neverdem
The community organizers who trained him in the mid-1980s blamed the plight of cities on taxpayer flight to suburbia. The totalitarian left hates it when the people are free to escape their crazy ideas, policies, ordinances and laws.
55
posted on
08/01/2012 5:27:36 PM PDT
by
RJL
(There's no greed like the greed of a liberal politician buying votes with your money.)
To: henkster
Too many people concentrated in a small area with a load of restrictions, I don’t care who lives there, they arn’t going to be happy for long.
56
posted on
08/01/2012 5:35:10 PM PDT
by
oyez
( .Apparently The U.S. CONSTITUTION has been reduced to the consistency of quicksand.)
To: neverdem
Clinton moved a lot of gang members out of the city through HUD programs. Maybe he was in on it.
To: Noumenon
Drone overflights, declaring things like dust and milk as EPA-regulated pollutants, control and cutoff of water...
Yeah, those drones really drive the bejeebers out of me. Unless I had a WWII "ack-ack gun" and a Sherman Jumbo in the back yard, I'd be real paranoid. B-P
58
posted on
08/01/2012 7:21:23 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: Drill Thrawl
How about burning Washington instead? Be sure to build a wall around it first, so they can't escape.
The British didn't, and it may have cost them the war. Learn from their mistake, so history doesn't repeat itself. ;-')
59
posted on
08/02/2012 12:26:48 AM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: Fair Paul
This is where the soccer moms will be a force for good, they will revolt against this idea.Really? The very same people who have left over Obama bumper stickers on their cars/vans from 2008?
60
posted on
08/02/2012 2:35:06 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson