Replies

The (cannot publish here all the foul words that come to mind) says;

"But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not on the streets of our cities."

Yeah, AK-47's are outdated. We should all have AK-103's. Or the -104.

Though I'd be perfectly willing to settle for semi-auto versions in the above, or semi-auto versions of M-14, or FN-FAL. A guy can only carry so much ammo...

Does anyone make a 'semi' version of the modernized Galil? (that would be nice!)

Just for hanging on the wall and admiring, of course.

But the guy wants "AK-47's "in the hands of soldiers?" Our own soldiers don't field that weapon. Hmmm, he thinks the old Soviet-bloc type soldiers, and the turd worlders should have them?

Whose side is this guy on? Those are the guys who should be disarmed. With those seized weapons passed out to U.S. citizenry. For wall hangings, of course. Mementos to peace, we could call them.

...commented before reading the thread. Interesting how many of us picked up on the same theme.

Soldiers. With AK's.

Not "our" guys, or hardly any soldiers of nations much aligned with us...