Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandyInSeattle
I see no value in voting for someone who has less than a snowball’s chance.

Well, (R) voters in Washington, Oregon, CA, Illinois, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maine, Vermont, NY, NJ, Hawaii, CT, Maryland, Massachusetts, & DC also have less than a snowball's chance of giving Romney those states' electoral votes...are you going to tell all (R) voters in those states not to vote for Romney 'cause he likewise has less than a snowball's chance??? Where's your consistency there?

144 posted on 07/25/2012 10:52:08 PM PDT by Colofornian (Saying Mitt would keep past political promises is like prophesying that Gumby won't bend anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian

There’s a difference between voting third party in a state where the outcome is already decided and voting third party in a state where it could affect the outcome.


250 posted on 07/26/2012 8:33:01 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Running in circles and screaming is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson