Skip to comments.Romney’s Palin Problem: Where’s Her Convention Invite? (Advisor: she will be prohibited to speak)
Posted on 07/15/2012 6:34:16 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[T]he Romney campaign has not asked Palin to speak at the convention nor contacted her about even attending the partys marquee event in Tampa. Queries to the Romney camp about any possible Palin role at the convention meet with a stony silence. Palin does not seem surprised. What can I say? she responded in an email from Alaska, when asked by Newsweek about the convention, just before heading to Michigan to deliver an Obama-thumping speech. Im sure Im not the only one accepting consequences for calling out both sides of the aisle for spending too much money, putting us on the road to bankruptcy, and engaging in crony capitalism.
Romney was the choice of the partys elites, whom Palin has regarded with open disdain ever since her rough treatment during the 2008 campaign. They are some of the same people who anonymously disparaged Palin as a clueless bumpkin, and some of them are now helping to run Romneys campaign. When unnamed Romney aides tell reporters that Romney will likely go with a safe choice for vice president because of the 2008 disaster, Palin notices.
The Romney camp will not comment on Palin, or on plans for the convention, but one adviser associated with the campaign suggested that Palin would be prohibited from speaking at the Republican convention by her contract with Fox News. Its true Im prohibited from doing some things, Palin says, but this is the first Ive heard anyone suggest that as an excuse, er, reason to stay away from engaging in the presidential race. Im quite confident Foxs top brass would never strip anyone of their First Amendment rights in this regard. (Fox says her contract would not prohibit speaking at the convention if she sought permission.)
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
I do not want to disagree with ‘dad’ but my guess Palin was ready to be president the minute she was born.
She has been elected to office man times, and served as governor as well as VP candidate.
Sarah will not be allowed to speak at the convention for one reason, she would look like the sun to Willard’s Uranus.
Romney wants to stick it in the face of conservatives, he hates us. He will speak to the NAACP but not to Christian groups. He will never go after Obama like he went after Newt.
Well how is he going to ban her? She can go if she wants, can’t she? Now I don’t know if she’ll be invited to speak there, but I don’t see how they can ban her from attendance? If ol’ Mickel Moore showed up unexpectedly at the 2004 Republican Conven. in New York, and wasn’t banned, how are they going to do that to Sarah?
I’m tentatively pending on confirmation of this story.
I think it sounds like bunk.
But then again, I’ve been wrong before.
I certainly hope it’s bunk.
Well how is he going to ban her? She can go if she wants, can’t she? Now I don’t know if she’ll be invited to speak there, but I don’t see how they can ban her from attendance? If ol’ Mickael Moore showed up unexpectedly at the 2004 Republican Conven. in New York, and wasn’t banned, how are they going to do that to Sarah?
“We conservatives do not need rinos, they need us. “
Wrong. Rinos do not need us as they demonstrated in 1996 and 2008. Rinos are liberals and are fully happy banking their donations and spending their life in Washington.
I mean there should be ‘no question’ that the last vice presidential candidate will be invited to the convention - speaking or not - great role or small role whether she wants to participate or not bein up to her......but just being silent about it means that they (Romney) are at least opening question whether to Invite her or not and there was a story months ago where they question whether or not to invite Palin....so this really isn’t a new story.
Look, ethier Romney directed or his advisors took it upon themselves to sabotage Sarah anonymously in 2008 according to many publications back then....if they hate Sarah so much then they hate the Tea Party types or anyone that wants better of the party just as much and this is disheartening that they will continue to fight US more than Them, the libs and socialists
“Repeal John Boehner” should be a required promise for conservatives running for Congress.
Now, that is thinking positive! I like it.
No need to rehash the girlie men business-as-usual go-along-to-get-along RINOs.
The eunuchs can keep pretending that the 'Rats are worried.
I too believe that was the turning point in the election. It was a very sad moment in history.
Sarah Palin is the ONLY thing that kept McCain alive.
Still, if they have some violence I might tune in later on ~ but it'd really take something to get me to bother with it.
This is a campaign conducted by congenital losers and they will lose as bad this time as the last time they ran a campaign.
We will not be rid of this GOP-e crowd until we expel them from the party.
Not completely relevant to the thread, but funny nevertheless.
I'll be shocked if they shut her out when the time comes. It makes no sense. Please pardon me while I be a skeptic about the article and what it's trying to do. I seriously doubt they have any interest in real news.
“Romney isnt even working to get the Conservative voters energized to vote for him.”
He is who he is:
I’m not willing to light my hair on fire to support this culture of death Republican.
Palin would energize the convention like no one else could. I believe that she would go a long way also with women and independents. (despite what the LSM keeps telling us)
Romney doesn’t agree with you. He intends to lose.
“We will not be rid of this GOP-e crowd until we expel them from the party.”
My friend. They have expelled us. Time to move on without the quislings.
The elections are becoming closer. Our side is sending US jobs to China - increasing unemployment here, which wins votes for DEMOCRATS.
The GOP needs everything to win this election, and bring BACK American jobs. Right away.
Or the GOP will cease to exist.
That’s just a fact. The GOP is on it’s last legs right now.
They are a small faction inside the Republican party but it has come time for us to rise up and expel them.
Palin’s speech at the 2008 convention was one of the best I’ve ever heard. I despise the GOP-E.
“The GOP needs everything to win this election, and bring BACK American jobs. Right away.
Or the GOP will cease to exist.
Thats just a fact. The GOP is on its last legs right now.”
If the current losership and nominee are the best GOP has to offer, I’m totally fine with its demise. Maybe in its place we will get a party that actually stands on its core principles and refuses to nominate gun grabbing socialist political charlatans.
Good. Because I sure as shootin’ am NOT going to vote for the myth, Romney. I’ll write in Palin, Jones, Smith, Mickey Mouse...before I’ll ever cast a vote for the frickin fraud-Romney.
Why would a liberal want a conservative to give a speech at his coronation?
Uummm....Ok Rommey is the nominee does it really matter whether Palin speaks or not? What would be the point with Mitt has the headliner. What could she possibly say that would make this a better situtation? Nobody is going to be watching this either way.
It would be like Ozzy giving a speech before Justin Bieber is accepted into the Rock-N-Roll Hall Of Shame. Which will probably happen before Deep Purple, Rush, Lynyrd Skynyrd, etc... get in.
I say let 'em fall. Time for a new party, and one WILL be coming along within the next few years, whether the GOP-E likes it or not. Our political system is reaching a point where, as a complex system, it will have enough energy injected into it to begin bifurcating like a chaotic system, and we're going to see our system drop over to a new strange attractor. Bet on it.
Further, it's numerically about time for another huge shift in our political system. ~90 years ago, we saw the Great Depression and the start of the New Deal. ~70 before that, the end of slavery and the civil war. ~50 years before that, the collapse of the Federalists and the beginning of the Era of Good Feelings and Democratic-Republican dominance for two decades. ~30 before that, the Revolution. ~10 years before that, the first serious colonial independence movements resulting from the Stamp Act, etc., after the end of the French and Indian War.
10-30-50-70-90. There's a pattern there, and we're nearing the end of the 90 year period for this cycle. Every other time, there have been huge dislocations, socially and politically, and in many cases, at least one of the major political parties has collapsed, or nearly done so, before being replaced and things renormalising a few elections later. We are on the cusp of major dislocations due to the massive debt, economic problems, and constitutional crises that Obama is forcing. Don't be surprised if the GOP simply collapses within a few years. Be ready to hop on board to build its replacement - while shutting out all of the present power brokers, brown nosers, and the rest in the current GOP.
We are being spat upon and laughed at by the GOP. They shoved the feckless Romney on us and care nothing for our values. Why? Because too many of us will STILL march into the voting booth and vote for who they tell us.
“If the current losership and nominee are the best GOP has to offer, Im totally fine with its demise. Maybe in its place we will get a party that actually stands on its core principles and refuses to nominate gun grabbing socialist political charlatans.”
I really have nothing to add to your post. I just think it bears repeating.
Agreed. Pathetic, isn’t it?
Shoot, just get together with other real conservatives and vote for Virgil Goode with the Constitution Party.
And yes I have a big girl crush on Palin..........((((sigh))))) ;-)
A very interesting post, and your historical summary is intriguing. Not sure I follow you on this though:
“Our political system is reaching a point where, as a complex system, it will have enough energy injected into it to begin bifurcating like a chaotic system, and we’re going to see our system drop over to a new strange attractor.”
Please explain. My take is simply that there is no need for two leftwing, big government, small liberty parties. Unrepresented people will go elsewhere. Obviously your analysis is more complex and I would like to understand it.
:....., and even nominate Palin as his VP.”
Palin would never accept a offer of a position from Romney. He burnt his bridges in 2008, and now has to spin Palin as a McCain mistake, when any fair observer would have noticed that Palin singlehandedly almost dragged a whinning, crying, and moribund McCain accross the line. Good thing that there were Romney folks on hand to save McCain from Palin by making sure he lost....lolololol
You’ll notice that Palin never endorses Romney directly keeping to the ABO meme......Doesn’t take much to see that Romney has earned himself a lifelong adversary....To my mind he deserves all the grief that Palin will undoubtedly heep on him. Good for her! Karma time for Mitt.
What goes around, comes around.......
“If not VP a cabinet post...She would really take a whip to energy.”
I fail to see how a stint in the Federal bureaucratic caverns would be anything other than determental to any long term political goals Sarah may have.
She’s fine where she is now, in the public eye, developing a public trust of her vision.....Her day will surely arrive, just as Reagan’s did, and a meaningless detour is not in the cards.
You have to adopt something like the party-list voting scheme popular in Israel, or the variation of that found in Denmark, or in Nederland.
Although these systems seem extremely different, they have been used in the USA in the past. Indiana used to have a system where no state legislative district could be smaller than a single county. That meant that 25% of the members were being elected from one district ~ (Indianapolis/Marion County) and another 20% were elected the same way in Vanderburg, Allen and Lake counties (Evansville, Fort Wayne and Gary/Hammond/East Chicago)
We survived, and smaller factions were able to work outside the two main parties to get their candidates elected ~ when you have 25 positions available in a single district a faction as small as 2.5% of the voting population can regularly win at least one position.
The math's different, but what happens under these other schemes is the factions making up the parties as we know them simply move out on their own and reserve their coalition activities for the legislative body.
The GOP-e would not survive multi-member districts.
I suspect it is bunk too. It would demoralize those who might support the Republican candidate. Just the trick if you ask me.
What? The word is getting out that only the RINOS and fearfilled are voting for Romney, and the s.o.b. conservatives are not?
About time. Hope the GOPE notices that 3 or 4% of us, or whatever it actually turns out to be, may matter in the end.
Probably they should have thought this problem through, before they crammed Romney down our throat. A socialist on a Republican ticket is no way to get my vote. EVER.
They are done with us and it’s quite clear our vote will be replaced by the 3/4% of socialists who are out of work. We are banished. But for the suckers who will vote Establishment.
When you have single member districts any representative system of governance is going to end up with two parties, each of which is dedicated to getting 50%+1 of the votes so they can put their guy into office.
That's why there are two major parties ~ with only a thin fringe around them.
The shape of America's political spectrum is what is known mathematically as a BI MODAL SADDLE.
The upshot is that the coalition building politics commonly found in European parliaments is done BEFORE the elections in the USA (and Canada and Mexico).
The problem for many of us comes from the disruption created by a dominant, but other wise small and otherwise meaningless and insignificant minority like the GOP-e who are able to control the donations streams!
Democrats have the same problem where a 15% minority of Democrats ~ the Far Left ~ have seized control of the organs of governance.
The GOP-e is, at most 5%, but in affiliation with the business class, can mount about 20% of the vote and regularly stick us with a congenital loser as our top end standard bearer.
Things are better down in the legislative districts, but not much.
Analysts used to look at this GOP-e phenomenon and describe it as the "Presidential Republicans". Today they're known as the Mittbots ~ and they've added a church to their internal power structure. I see a night of the long knives ahead for that mess.
They will never, ever, EVER forgive her for that.
” Because too many of us will STILL march into the voting booth and vote for who they tell us.”<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Amen, brother! Amen!
Let me risk repeating myself: There are conservatives who are more RINO pragmatic than conservative, and there are conservatives who are more afraid than conservative, and then there are the s.o.b. conservatives who will cross the line. No surrender. These are the ones I want to hang with.
Romney. in a thousand ways, has already told us to kiss off.
I intend to oblige him.
Well said, my FRiend.
The Republican Party is rotting from within. I wish Sarah and other like-minded politicans would flip the elites the bird and all join another party, like the Constitution Party.
They all are so clearly not welcome, as are the rank-and-file conservative, it just doesn’t make sense to waste time with them.
Conservatives are the only political opponents Rinos have. They love the socialists. They want to be like the British Tory Party and name all the opposition haters and terrorists.
[ Romney was the choice of the partys elites ]
Actually too many conservative candidates was what selected Romney.. The conservative vote was watered down.. It was not party elites at all..
Unless some of the candidates were the party elites..
Romney is and was known to be a RINO... still is..
Too many conservatives is what selected Romney..
Some conservatives are not conservatives..
Whats needed is a radical.. not a conservative..
It would take a radical to restore this Republic..
Radical change is needed..
The word conservative is nebulous..
I remain praying for a miracle in Tampa.
Hope she’s ready!
I remember when Glenn Beck was talking about how the progressives and communists had taken over the Democrat party and were starting to take over the GOP and I thought to myself “Nah, not the GOP” but these RINOS they act just like the Democrats too. I can say one thing that the Dems do differently than the RINOS do in our party, they don’t eat their own. You’ll never hear any Dem trash Wasserman Shultz even though she is a walking epic fail of stupid..but with the GOP elitists, for some reason, love trashing Conservatives. If Romney had ANY brains in his head, he would have invited Sarah a long time ago, even if he doesn’t like her, he could have used her support, by doing this, all he has done is alienated a large portion of the GOP, is Romney THAT desperate for Independent voters that he will throw us down the shaft
OK, so I haven’t read all 90 plus posts but I imagine that many of us are saying something like: Palin is our favorite leader in the party. She draws the largest crowds since Reagan. She is a great speaker. She is supporting Romney.
SO, if she isn’t invited to speak, I will not be watching any of the convention.
Why are they demotivating the base?
I love your screen name.
Sara Johnson super detective and international spy............ ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.