Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most blacks don't equate gay rights with civil rights
Daily Caller ^ | July 15 2012 | Paul Conner

Posted on 07/15/2012 1:43:35 PM PDT by scottjewell

President Barack Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus are not in step with the majority of African-Americans who don’t equate gay rights with civil rights, former Rep. Artur Davis said in an interview.

“When you say to African-Americans, ‘the gay struggle is the black struggle,’ they don’t buy it,” David explained to The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas.

Davis, a former Democrat from Alabama, cited the prejudices that blacks dealt with as evidence: exclusion from the voting booth, job opportunities and colleges; and the threat of violence against them.

“African-Americans were completely, in every sense of the word, marginalized,” he said. “They were also the poorest group in the United States. With all due respect to gay Americans, that’s not the condition of the gay community today.”

Davis described how Obama”s announcement of support for gay marriage made many people uneasy in the black community, although a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that support for gay marriage jumped to 59 percent among blacks.

“Many African-Americans think there’s a virtue in men marrying women because it means mothers and fathers, frankly. That’s their real stake in the issue,” he said. “There’s no question that the African-American community is a monolithic liberal community on economic issues, but it is a much more conflicted community on social issues.”

He explained that while blacks may agree with Republicans on some social issues, the GOP has a long way to go in proving that free-market ideas are good for minorities.

Look for the full interview with Davis Monday morning.

VIDEO:

http://dailycaller.com/?p=3267520#ooid=xzaTZkNToRqxrdO7cn1FsiGDsvm8By5c


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Davis is correct on all counts.
1 posted on 07/15/2012 1:43:38 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

The chance this will change a significant number of Black votes? ZERO!


2 posted on 07/15/2012 1:58:12 PM PDT by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
President Barack Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus are not in step with the majority of African-Americans who don’t equate gay rights with civil rights, former Rep. Artur Davis said in an interview.

they never have been, i would think.

3 posted on 07/15/2012 1:59:48 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (America has enemies. And friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

Lets see here:

Civil Rights - The right to be treated equally in areas pertaining to race, gender, and other areas of life you have no choice in the matter. How many choose to be born of a specific race?

“Gay Rights” - Wanting additional “rights” that no other group has, based on for own CHOICE of lifestyle...

Hmmm...


4 posted on 07/15/2012 2:01:21 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1
The chance this will change a significant number of Black votes? ZERO!

Don't you know? Race trumps EVERYTHING!

5 posted on 07/15/2012 2:02:21 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Civil Rights - The right to be treated equally in areas pertaining to race, gender sex, and other areas of life you have no choice in the matter. (Of course, nowadays there are people choosing to change their sex to the extent doctors can.)

“Gay Rights” - demanding that all governments pretend that homosexuality is normal.

6 posted on 07/15/2012 2:07:21 PM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Don't you know? Race trumps EVERYTHING!

I'd disagree. If McCain's and Obama's party affiliations had been reversed, Obama would have won 10% of the black vote. Party trumps everything, especially when the party concerned is an advocate of freebies and racial preferences for blacks.

7 posted on 07/15/2012 2:21:10 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

I don’t think this will make any blacks vote for Romney. It might, however, make some abstain from voting altogether. Probably not a great number, though....


8 posted on 07/15/2012 2:26:59 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

9 posted on 07/15/2012 2:28:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I think you’re right. It is party in terms of elections. A Herman Cain on the GOP ticket versus a white Democrat would lose with black voters.


10 posted on 07/15/2012 2:33:09 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
“When you say to African-Americans, ‘the gay struggle is the black struggle,’ they don’t buy it,” David explained to The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas.

If I was black I would be highly insulted that someone made the comparison...

No gay person was ever put in chains or made a slave(at least not against their will), no gay person was denied an education, denied equal pay, had their children sold off as property, denied even basic human rights..

The only thing gays are not being recognized for is being normal...which they are not...

Blacks may not vote for Romney but they certainly might sit on their hands in protest..

Funny how Holder is trying to gin up their base by claiming voter suppression.... interesting timeline...

11 posted on 07/15/2012 2:43:49 PM PDT by Popman (When you elect a clown: expect a circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks scottjewell.
Davis, a former Democrat from Alabama, cited the prejudices that blacks dealt with as evidence: exclusion from the voting booth, job opportunities and colleges; and the threat of violence against them... "African-Americans were... also the poorest group in the United States. With all due respect to gay Americans, that's not the condition of the gay community today." ...a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that support for gay marriage jumped to 59 percent among blacks.

12 posted on 07/15/2012 3:14:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Popman

Yes, insulted would be the right reaction. So many of these politically correct gays with their agenda are very monied, very powerful in terms of real estate, professions, investments, etc. Many of them are in television and film production, in the Hollywood set and as a political lobby they are extremely powerful though they comprise roughly 2% of the population. As a “class” they do not tend to be underprivileged like the blacks. And as he states in the video, for blacks, marriage is seen as a goal for the preservation of families and children. Not as some new fangled form of liberation and political fashion statement.


13 posted on 07/15/2012 3:25:17 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Most welcome.


14 posted on 07/15/2012 3:26:42 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

This might

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgbwlnpY5B8


15 posted on 07/15/2012 3:50:54 PM PDT by mardi59 (THE REBELLION IS ON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertylover; Popman
I don't think "normal" vs "abnormal" is quite the distinction you want. The key distinction is "moral" vs "immoral."

Even if it were rare, or even unheard-of ("abnormal"), for people to be self-controlled, generous, honest, modest, pure, chaste -- it would still be right.

Even if it were typical ("normal") for people to be self-gratifying, exploitative, promiscuous, lustful, perverse, sodomistic --- it would still be wrong.

16 posted on 07/15/2012 5:20:57 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("You can observe a lot just by watchin'." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

The big issue with “homosexual rights”, which is not talked about very much, is that the “gay” community was a hidden group. It’s as if “Don’t Ask / Don’t Tell” used to apply to our entire society. Gays only had problems if they insisted on being publicly and openly homosexual.

Gays today insist that “we’re here, we’re queer” and other more vulgar language heard at homosexual pride parades. They insist on getting in people’s faces. Then, if there is a backlash, according to liberal theology, the fault is not with the gays who insist on provoking mainstream society. The fault is that of mainstream society, for not being tolerant or liberal enough.

Heck some of these “gay pride” parades advertise themselves as family friendly nowadays! Bring the family, and bring the kids, they say! Enjoy the parade with the family!

Maybe I went on a tangent, but we’re well on the way to normalizing homosexuality in our culture.


17 posted on 07/15/2012 6:52:30 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

Race is an immutable condition, sexual preference is not.


18 posted on 07/15/2012 6:56:28 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson