To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bullshit. Roberts, in an attempt to de-politicize his court in the public opinion, cemented himself as an activist judge with the most political decision of the century.
6 posted on
06/29/2012 9:10:32 PM PDT by
Flightdeck
(If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
To: Flightdeck
He and the Gang of Four did not abide by the usual court principle of tax law cases, which is not to intervene until somebody actually gets dinged for the tax. They jumped down Alice in Wonderland’s rabbit hole here.
11 posted on
06/29/2012 9:13:41 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew)
To: Flightdeck
I agree. Roberts trying not to be political and his decision was political. Not using the commerce clause to tax inactitivty by calling the penalty or mandate a Tax to tax inactivity. I feel like I am Alice in Wonderland having tea with the Mad Hatter. Up is down , bad is good
18 posted on
06/29/2012 9:17:12 PM PDT by
funfan
To: Flightdeck
I agree. Roberts trying not to be political and his decision was political. Not using the commerce clause to tax inactivity by calling the penalty or mandate a Tax to tax inactivity. I feel like I am Alice in Wonderland having tea with the Mad Hatter. Up is down , bad is good
19 posted on
06/29/2012 9:17:31 PM PDT by
funfan
To: Flightdeck
Bullshit. Roberts, in an attempt to de-politicize his court in the public opinion, cemented himself as an activist judge with the most political decision of the century.Besides, you can't worry about public opinion. The left doesn't. Besides, public opinion would have been WITH him had he done the right thing (his freakin' JOBBBBB!)
23 posted on
06/29/2012 9:19:50 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson