Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones

“Simply start a movement for a constitutional amendment that will outlaw this kind of broad taxing power.”

Yes, that would work. However, personally, I find it EASY “to believe that we can’t get enough of the public behind an anti-tax amendment to make it viable.” Since when have conservatives controlled 2/3 of both houses of Congress as well as 3/4 of the states?


651 posted on 06/28/2012 8:48:40 AM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies ]


To: Stat Man

This may be a silly question, but if the individual mandate is now law and everyone must buy health insurance, why the provision that those up to the age of 26 can remain on their parents insurance? Won’t they have to buy their own now?


657 posted on 06/28/2012 8:51:26 AM PDT by animal172 (Calling the Founding Fathers!! We need your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies ]

To: Stat Man
Yes, that would work. However, personally, I find it EASY “to believe that we can’t get enough of the public behind an anti-tax amendment to make it viable.” Since when have conservatives controlled 2/3 of both houses of Congress as well as 3/4 of the states?

It's a matter of getting enough of the public behind it to put pressure on enough of the softer Democrats to peel them off to our side. I think the right kind of anti-tax amendment would be as popular as the anti-gay marriage legislation is in the vast majority of the states.

690 posted on 06/28/2012 9:10:23 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson