1 posted on
06/14/2012 7:50:47 AM PDT by
MNDude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: MNDude
Unexpected Increase Please, no, my liver can't take it any more.
2 posted on
06/14/2012 7:52:35 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
To: MNDude
“unexpected” because the president’s economic program has been working so well and we are in the middle of a re-energizing recovery from those bad republican (5% unemployment) years...
To: MNDude
"unexpected". How shocking. Or shall I say, "I'm shocked, SHOCKED to find there's gambling here. . (Your winnings, sir. . . )
4 posted on
06/14/2012 7:54:45 AM PDT by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
To: MNDude
“unexpected”
They keep using that word. I don’t think it means what they think it means.
5 posted on
06/14/2012 7:54:50 AM PDT by
nhoward14
To: MNDude
The expected use of the word "unexpected."
6 posted on
06/14/2012 7:55:01 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: MNDude
"The recent and growing weakness in the labor force continues to undermine confidence in the sustainability of the U.S. recovery," What recovery?
7 posted on
06/14/2012 7:55:01 AM PDT by
Principled
(It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
To: MNDude
To: MNDude
How many times can the “experts” use the term “unexpectedly” before their “expert” status is called into question?
10 posted on
06/14/2012 7:55:48 AM PDT by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: MNDude
11 posted on
06/14/2012 7:55:57 AM PDT by
TSgt
(The only reason I have one in the chamber at all times, is because it is impossible to have two in.)
To: MNDude
Cant be, according to the genius in chief, the private sector is doing fine
To: MNDude
They use the word “unexpected” more than a rap artiste uses the “F-word.”
13 posted on
06/14/2012 7:57:09 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
To: MNDude
I lost track - is this unexpected "modest increase" based on last week's original unexpected increase or was it based on last week's unexpected revised modest unexpected increase?
17 posted on
06/14/2012 8:02:00 AM PDT by
FroggyTheGremlim
(Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
To: MNDude
“Unexpected” is BACK! Yeaaaaah!!!!
To: MNDude
The backroom Dem strategy meetings are probably already trying to figure out how to dump The One and replace him with a viable candidate.
Their internal polling is probably showing they are headed for an atrocious defeat. It would be hilarious if Obama got fewer Electoral Votes in 2012 than McCain got in 2008.
19 posted on
06/14/2012 8:02:22 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: MNDude
I expected it, why can’t they? Same President. Same bad news.
20 posted on
06/14/2012 8:03:05 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: MNDude
Add to this high school grads, college grads, temps and others working less than six months before being discharged, none of whom qualify for unemployment benefits, and that number would soar if they were eligible. Personally, I'd like to add Obama, his cabinet and czars to that statistic and that would be good news.
To: MNDude
If
anything bad ever happens during this administration that's not a result that's completely predictable by anyone who has two live brain cells that are connected to each other, and it isn't described by the alphabet media as "unexpectedly", I think I'll probably fall over in awe.
23 posted on
06/14/2012 8:03:50 AM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: MNDude
Let's give the
"unexpected" President his expected defeat.
I'm surprised the MSM is not hip to this word and uses it repeatedly, without question.
Perhaps we should not be surprised. Apparently they are so condescending that they foist "unexpected" on the masses one more time.
28 posted on
06/14/2012 8:09:21 AM PDT by
cicero2k
To: MNDude; All
"unexpected increase"
again.. again.. & again...
IT'S HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES, YOU STUPID (LIBERAL) JOURNALISTS!...
simulation-response; action-reaction..
29 posted on
06/14/2012 8:12:18 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
To: MNDude
Why all the guessing? Why do we need to try and guess what the numbers are going to be? Why do we have to “revise” the numbers? Why can’t we just WAIT until the actual, real numbers come out?
36 posted on
06/14/2012 8:41:39 AM PDT by
faucetman
( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson