Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Show Unexpected Increase
http://www.rttnews.com/1906545/u-s-weekly-jobless-claims-show-unexpected-increase.aspx?type=fts&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=sitemap ^

Posted on 06/14/2012 7:50:40 AM PDT by MNDude

(RTTNews) - New claims for unemployment insurance in the U.S. unexpectedly saw a modest increase in the week ended June 9th, according to figures released Thursday by the Labor Department.

The Labor Department estimated initial jobless claims at a seasonally adjusted level of 386,000, an increase of 6,000 from the previous week's revised level of 380,000.

The increase surprised economists, who had expected jobless claims to edge down to 375,000 from the 377,000 originally reported for the previous week.

Lindsey Piegza, an economist at FTN Financial, said, "While noticeably down from this time last year, claims remain elevated after the downward trend arrested back in February."

"The recent and growing weakness in the labor force continues to undermine confidence in the sustainability of the U.S. recovery," she added. "The downward trend in claims has yet to be reinstated suggesting further weakness in payrolls is likely."

(Excerpt) Read more at rttnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; bhoeconomy; democrats; news; obama; unexpected
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2012 7:50:47 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MNDude
Unexpected Increase

Please, no, my liver can't take it any more.

2 posted on 06/14/2012 7:52:35 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“unexpected” because the president’s economic program has been working so well and we are in the middle of a re-energizing recovery from those bad republican (5% unemployment) years...


3 posted on 06/14/2012 7:53:46 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
"unexpected". How shocking. Or shall I say, "I'm shocked, SHOCKED to find there's gambling here. . (Your winnings, sir. . . )



4 posted on 06/14/2012 7:54:45 AM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“unexpected”

They keep using that word. I don’t think it means what they think it means.


5 posted on 06/14/2012 7:54:50 AM PDT by nhoward14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
The expected use of the word "unexpected."
6 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
"The recent and growing weakness in the labor force continues to undermine confidence in the sustainability of the U.S. recovery,"

What recovery?

7 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:01 AM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Drink?


8 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:12 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

ooops- a mistaaaaake..

they should have waited till late friday to release
this news flash.... well maybe the obummer news agencies don’t care anymore.


9 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:19 AM PDT by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

How many times can the “experts” use the term “unexpectedly” before their “expert” status is called into question?


10 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:48 AM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

11 posted on 06/14/2012 7:55:57 AM PDT by TSgt (The only reason I have one in the chamber at all times, is because it is impossible to have two in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Cant be, according to the genius in chief, the private sector is doing fine


12 posted on 06/14/2012 7:56:39 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

They use the word “unexpected” more than a rap artiste uses the “F-word.”


13 posted on 06/14/2012 7:57:09 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You’d think that after a while, the word loses meaning.


14 posted on 06/14/2012 7:57:42 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

As a science type, I do experience the thrill of “unexpected” occasionally.

However, amongst my colleagues, one who experiences “unexpected” too often soon finds themselves working in areas where less intellect is required.

Three of which are obviously journalism, economics analysis, and politics.


15 posted on 06/14/2012 7:57:42 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gorush

There’s no scorekeeping on the MSM.

An infinite number of errors is considered acceptable.


16 posted on 06/14/2012 7:59:01 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
I lost track - is this unexpected "modest increase" based on last week's original unexpected increase or was it based on last week's unexpected revised modest unexpected increase?
17 posted on 06/14/2012 8:02:00 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“Unexpected” is BACK! Yeaaaaah!!!!


18 posted on 06/14/2012 8:02:15 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

The backroom Dem strategy meetings are probably already trying to figure out how to dump The One and replace him with a viable candidate.

Their internal polling is probably showing they are headed for an atrocious defeat. It would be hilarious if Obama got fewer Electoral Votes in 2012 than McCain got in 2008.


19 posted on 06/14/2012 8:02:22 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

I expected it, why can’t they? Same President. Same bad news.


20 posted on 06/14/2012 8:03:05 AM PDT by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson