Right, he could be Ambassador to China again, under an (R) administration this time. /sarc
Huntsman proved his worthlessness by carrying water for Obama. Bilderbergs might want him for SoS but I don't see Romney being tied to influence of the Euro-bankers/power brokers the same way Bush-Clinton-Obama's have been enough to pick him for that position on their say so.
Huntsman is attending the Bilderberger conference in VA this week and would be an important link for the powers working for a world ‘governance’.
I appreciate where you are coming from but Euro solvency is of more concern this time around, I think. Obama can't be counted on by Bilderberg to deliver, and they are regrouping. A QE4 to prop up the Euro won't fly. Fed has no money, China is slowing, so no artificially propped-up yuan from them this time around either.
In fact if US is gonna prop them up we need to generate the revenue to do it, and that might only come by getting Obama out and Romney in where US goes gang busters with our deregulated energy sector, deregulation of business and privatization of public lands.
If the rising tide lifts all boats, then fine. US supremacy and freedom again rule the day like post-WWII, and if that makes bankers happy because they get their money in the end, I am fine with that. If it's they are making money ONLY BECAUSE we are making money, I am fine with that, too. They need us more than we need them, and we can put them on a leash to a certain extent. America back in the world driver's seat suits me fine all the way around.
It has been in the interest of world bankers to weaken the US for a time (at least since 2008). They pulled $5T out of our economy in one day on Sept 16, 2008, didn't they?
The US is an undervalued asset today, and lots of bargains have been created here as a result. Businesses have billions on the side awaiting and investment climate. A Romney presidency is just that environment.
Remember, Bretton Woods (1944) predates the 1st Bilderberg in 1954. It was a precursor to Biderberg, in fact. It was in their interest to have the stability of the US pegging a $-value to gold.
Remember this too, they wanted Bush in 1980 and only got him for VP under Reagan. Bilderbergs don't always get their way.
There's no telling what those f*#%ers are up to this time, but we might be surprised what they think is in their best interests this time around.
Dick Cheney is not well enough with his new heart to do the CIA directorship.
Bill Casey wasn't the picture of health under Reagan either. I wouldn't necessarily count Cheney out.
The Congressman from South Carolina who is stomping on Holder every time he has the floor of the F&F hearings would be an ideal head of CIA or Attorney General. Gowdy is the sort of no nonsense man a squishy moderate like Milt needs to give gravitas to his administration.
Well, his Congressional office was broken into with in the last two weeks for some reason, so you might be right. I like Gowdy. Also like Bachmann.
The installing of Sarah to run energy and EPA would cause enough liberal head explosion for that reason alone to appoint her!
As the song goes, "I can dream, can't I?" :-)
I like the idea of revealing some of his cabinet now and sending them into the fray, but to reveal all of them now would only give the lying media more room to falsely accuse individuals and tie them to Milt.
My point is the media and DNC couldn't keep up with the onslaught. They'd be overwhelmed by them. And they'd be the inspirational knockdown drag-outs that Romney seems caple of and inclined at this point to go brass knuckles on.
sides, little barry bastard commie isn’t going to be the demoncrap nominee in November if things continue to unravel in his fraudulent lifestory.
If so, all the more reason to send the "cabinet-in-waiting" out there to take out Barry O'bastard's appointees, and then let Romney finish off what's left of Biden and that foot he's still got stuck up Obama's gay ass!
FReegards!
