The dog-eating didn’t help.
Perhaps. I think it's due to the gay marriage (wide) stance.
The others will be Jarrett/DuvalPatrick/VanJones type radicals
The second coming of Reagan wouldn't be able to undo that damage... If that prospect doesn't scare people, don't know what will
No, it didn't. It's not just disgust at the idea of eating Man's Best Friend, either. It's the un-Americanness of it. We don't eat dogs, but many foreigners do. So Obama, not content merely to eat the dog, elects to rub our noses in it. I.e.: he could have asked Bill Ayers not to include it, but he obviously wanted it prominently displayed in his bio. It's O’s way of saying, in so many words, ‘Culturally, I'm not an American—and I'm proud of that’.
It's the kind of thing that rubs people the wrong way. Plus, he's been letting his anger show too much of late. Some pollster or other once said, ‘People don't want an angry man in their living room’. Obama, surrounded by his shrunken, sycophantic Chicago coterie, has no idea his anger, constant attacks and constant blaming are not playing well. He probably reads DU, sees some favorable comments, and thinks he's on a roll.
I heard Dick Morris on the radio yesterday. He said historically people haven't been enthused about Obama’s policies, but they've liked Obama personally. Morris says that has just upended, and w’in the past mo people are starting to like Obama himself even less than his policies. Sure looks like Obama is riding for a fall. Maybe the USA at large isn't just Chicago on a bigger scale after all.
I think screwing the pooch is worse than eating it...
The dog-eating didn’t help.
I was thinking Obama’s stance on gay “marriage” or maybe thats what you meant.