Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Road to 270 Relies on ‘Hawkeye Granite’ or ‘Southern Sweep’
ABC News ^ | May 10, 2012 | Amy Walter

Posted on 05/10/2012 9:29:34 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Impy
Remember, McCain lost 363 to 173. In order to break 270, Romney has to flip Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, NH, and something else. that is a tall order. I'm sure he'll manage a few of them but he can't lose even one of them and, to make it worse, he needs to flip a safe state. I wish him luck, I truly do.
61 posted on 05/15/2012 12:37:15 AM PDT by RC one (all y'all had to do was vote for Newt but noooooo, he wasn't good enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RC one
In order to break 270, Romney has to flip Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, NH, and something else.

No. Those would leave him at exactly 270. What the heck numbers are you looking at? Use that link I posted maybe you are looking the electoral votes from before the new census.

to make it worse, he needs to flip a safe state.

I have no idea what state you could be referring to. I laid out the numbers for you. The "safe" Obama states result in about 200 votes about the same as the states I think are certain to go for Romney (206).

I also don't understand why you are fixating on the number of states he needs to "flip" either. Bush needed to flip a lot of states to win in 2000. Obama needed to flip 1 and did much better than that. Things change, this is not 2008 when Obama won because Bush and the GOP were as popular as dirt. Romney is tied or slightly ahead in credible polls. You could better compare this election to 2004.

Obama could win, especially if Romney screws up but I think his ceiling is lower, ie if someone pulls out to a decent lead it won't be Obama. If he wins it's narrowly. My own prediction is a narrow win for Romney.

62 posted on 05/15/2012 1:31:14 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Impy

another 3rd shifter I see. First of all, national polls don’t matter, they never do. All that matters to Mitt Romney is “flipping” enough previously blue battleground states and/or other previously blue states and, as I said, that means he has to flip Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, NH, and one other previously blue state. failing to flip the “one other previously blue state” puts him at 265 EVs to Obama’s 273. So, I am sure he’ll grab a few of those states but I don’t believe the demographics are sufficiently in his favor to flip ALL of them.


63 posted on 05/15/2012 1:58:11 AM PDT by RC one (all y'all had to do was vote for Newt but noooooo, he wasn't good enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RC one

First of all, national polls don’t matter, they never do.

State polls in the swing states matter more but still it's retarded to pretend national polls mean nothing. If Romney is polling ahead nationally it's not plausible that he'd lose states that are more Republican than the country. That alone places him on the cusp of victory. If you win the popular vote by more than 1% the chances you'll lose the electoral college is slim.

that means he has to flip Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, NH, and one other previously blue state.

For the THIRD TIME that collection of states results in exactly 270, learn to count my friend. How many votes do you have those adding up to because I'm telling you the correct number is 270. Even if he needed 2 more states which he wouldn't because that collection of states results in exactly 270 I think he'll get Iowa and Colorado is 50/50. And there are several other states Obama won in play.

And you are making it sound like Romney is starting from where McCain did an has to make up that ground somehow. If so where have you been the past 4 years? Obama was on a high in 2008, he's come back to Earth. He's not gonna get that same high turnout with Blacks or White college idiots and he's not gonna do as well with independents.

Also this isn't a video game where Romney is expending bullets to "flip states" one at a time and he's gonna run out of ammo before he can get the last one or something like that. Your characterization of the race is very bizarre to me, forgive me for not quite understanding.

Every state is on a pendulum and that pendulum has swung further to the Republican side than it was in 2008.

64 posted on 05/15/2012 2:48:46 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Impy
It adds up to 265 EVs for Romney and 273 for Obama. If Romney wins New mexico too, it's 270 so that's one more swing state he basically has to win. He might have better luck in nevada of course which would also get him to 270. He also has to win all of Nebraska's EVs which McCain failed to do btw. This all adds up to long odds. Furthermore, national polls are mostly irrelevant. The only polls that matter are the polls taken of likely voters in the aforementioned swing states.
65 posted on 05/15/2012 3:06:31 AM PDT by RC one (all y'all had to do was vote for Newt but noooooo, he wasn't good enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RC one
It adds up to 265 EVs for Romney and 273 for Obama

No. It would add up to 264 under the previous allocation (not 265) but it adds up to 270 now because we had a census and the number of votes each state gets has changed, this occurs every 10 years.

Of this I'm 100% certain. I have no idea how you are doing your counting but it's wrong, you are giving Obama 5 phantom votes.

http://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/evcalc.php

Please use that link and see for yourself so we can stop arguing about your incorrect math on top of more important things.

He also has to win all of Nebraska's EVs which McCain failed to do btw.

Please, that 1 vote is the surest gain of all. Obama won the Omaha congressional district by a hair after trying hard to do so. In a fantasy world where he is more popular than last time maybe he wins it again, in the real world where he is less popular he has 0 chance of winning it and would be a fool to waste a dime trying.

You are untitled to your view that Romney has "long odds" but most serious analysts would disagree. Only people saying it will be an easy Obama win are democrat shills and people who think Romney is worse than Obama and thus want Romney to lose. Neither of them live in the real world in terms of correctly evaluating the race. Honestly saying a guy tied or AHEAD in the national polls has "long odds" is just completely absurd. He has even odds at worst as of today. The election isn't today but that's where it stands now.

66 posted on 05/15/2012 4:22:12 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson