Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Birth Certificate Required
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | May 8, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 05/08/2012 5:36:56 PM PDT by CitizenM

- Pro-Choice White House Requires Registration of Unborn Children for Tours - The White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

White House Visitors Office director Ellie Schafer sent an email to a Capitol Hill staffer Tuesday morning explaining the process for registering an unborn fetus for a White House tour:

We have received a number of calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet been born.

Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process.

LAST NAME: The family’s last name

FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name
MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name
DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we’ll ask you to update it at the time of birth
SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero’s (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!)
CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parents

Update: The National Right to Life Committee released a statement on Tuesday afternoon about Shafer’s email, highlighting the fact that the “Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes, but tolerates legal abortion to [the] moment 
of birth in District of Columbia.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; baby; birthcertificate; fetus; naturalborncitizen; prochoice
The hypocrisy of the confused, self-serving Liberal mind. Now they declare that an unborn baby is a life and human entity when they want to "count" it. But if they want to abort it...well, then that's alright because it is only a collection of cells and not really a human anyway.

And...What happens if the mother aborts the baby after she has visited the White House and the child was recorded as a "visitor?" Do they go back and ask that the record of that baby be deleted, since, obviously, the pro-abortion belief is that human baby never existed?

How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?

1 posted on 05/08/2012 5:37:09 PM PDT by CitizenM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

The dumb get dumber and, well, the folks at FR just scratch their collective heads... This counrty is bassackwards for sure! And to think that liberals are usually creatures of “higher learning”...


2 posted on 05/08/2012 5:43:22 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Under Romney's Governorship, MA. was the birthplace of gay marriage & socialized medicine in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...

The National Right to Life Committee released a statement on Tuesday afternoon about Shafer’s email, highlighting the fact that the “Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes, but tolerates legal abortion to [the] moment 
of birth in District of Columbia.”

"It is ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House -- yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth,” said Douglas Johnson, National Right to Life legislative director. “Notably, the newsletter provides no guidance on what the staff should do if an unborn baby is first registered for security purposes, but then aborted. On May 17, the House Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee plans to hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would generally prohibit abortion in the sixth month and later in the District. If the President wants to provide for the security of the unborn child immediately outside of the White House gates, as well as inside, he should endorse this bill."

3 posted on 05/08/2012 5:50:36 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
Birthers.
4 posted on 05/08/2012 5:51:06 PM PDT by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

Maybe they’ll compromise and count pre-born babies as three-fifths of a person.


5 posted on 05/08/2012 5:51:55 PM PDT by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sthguard

C’est plus ca change, C’est plus sa meme change!

{”the more things change, the more they stay the same!”}


6 posted on 05/08/2012 5:55:19 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (NEWT in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Perfectly representative of the current administration...

We are the sole arbiters of what does and doesn't count.

7 posted on 05/08/2012 6:02:15 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

Just means democrats have no problem at all with MURDER. They could care less if there’s living, breathing human being residing in the body of the murder. They thinks it’s the “right” of the mother to murder this child, time and time again, if she feels like it.


8 posted on 05/08/2012 6:11:23 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

Yet this is the same Obama White House that would struggle to explain why a legit BC cannot be produced from Obama.


9 posted on 05/08/2012 6:21:35 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

Is this a joke? Why would anyone register an unborn baby?


10 posted on 05/08/2012 6:23:06 PM PDT by donna (Mitt? NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

“Just means democrats have no problem at all with MURDER . .”

There once was, and may yet be a Democrats For Life organization, and I believe some members of the Congress were members. However, I don’t know of anything its members did to make Dems For Life well and openly known to the public.


11 posted on 05/08/2012 6:29:23 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

This is incredibly stupid on many levels. Count the unborn however they wish but how about we just don’t kill them?


12 posted on 05/08/2012 6:38:01 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

I want to know too. Why would OBAMA want this? For what purpose is this maniacal pro-infanticide creature doing this?


13 posted on 05/08/2012 6:38:12 PM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Just to screw with everyone. An ‘in your face’ action. A big F-You to the people who believe life begins at conception.


14 posted on 05/08/2012 7:05:53 PM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Totally agree!


15 posted on 05/08/2012 7:11:43 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

But what if the mother is planning on getting an abortion?


16 posted on 05/08/2012 7:21:50 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

................How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?...................

Maybe it’s easy. If the mother-to-be checks off Democrat, her future vote will be counted as two votes, as they both visited the White Hut!


17 posted on 05/08/2012 7:31:49 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

I thought it was an evil Marxist joke, but, I found this:

Requiring parents to register their unborn child “serves as a placeholder,” spokesman Max Milien said. He said the policy helps “to expedite the process” when parents arrive for a tour with a baby who has been born recently.


18 posted on 05/08/2012 8:03:37 PM PDT by donna (Mitt? NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes,

What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?
19 posted on 05/08/2012 8:27:50 PM PDT by Ellendra ("It's astounding how often people mistake their own stupidity for a lack of fairness." --Thunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

>
What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?

Don’t you get it, any human poses a security risk simply because they have that “free will” thing!


20 posted on 05/08/2012 8:50:11 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: donna

Yes, it sounds like it’s only for unborn babies that will be born by the time of the tour. That makes more sense.


21 posted on 05/08/2012 10:31:20 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

The unborn babies are probably labeled as potentiontial terrorists entering the White House.


22 posted on 05/08/2012 11:15:40 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Close.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

23 posted on 05/09/2012 1:32:35 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra
What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?

Maybe they are worried that the bulge is a bomb, not a baby.

24 posted on 05/09/2012 1:35:30 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Do they register beer guts? ;)


25 posted on 05/09/2012 1:44:33 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Do they register beer guts? ;)

Don't give them ideas.

26 posted on 05/09/2012 2:01:17 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

“plus ca change, c’est plus la meme chose”


27 posted on 05/09/2012 4:05:49 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

HAHAHAHA!


28 posted on 05/09/2012 6:39:35 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

If I lived closer to DC, I would go for a tour, say I was pregnant but that they couldn’t count my unborn as a person because I am planning on having an abortion. Seems contradictory to their horrendous support of abortion, unless they are now admitting that they support the killing of babies.

On another note, why would they want to prop up their numbers by counting unborn babies.

I was about 8 months pregnant when I toured the whitehouse when Bush 1 was in office. I didn’t have to show any ID for him.


29 posted on 05/09/2012 9:20:06 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

I don’t understand the reasoning behind this requirement. If I were pregnant, I certainly wouldn’t do that. I wouldn’t visit if I were showing. No need to give the government more information than necessary.

And yes, the hypocrisy is stunning.


30 posted on 05/09/2012 9:21:11 AM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb; TChad; All

LOL!! I don’t have a “beer gut”, but I certainly have a belly. I could be in big trouble!


31 posted on 05/09/2012 9:44:59 AM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

ping


32 posted on 05/09/2012 10:00:02 AM PDT by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Obama has just done the same thing to those people who believe God created marriage only between one man and one woman. I think he has just driven the last nail into his re-election campaign. Good bye BO, glad to get rid of you as President.


33 posted on 05/09/2012 12:31:03 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

The Place for Conservatives

Liberals do not want liberty for anyone.
They would rather dictate what we do, what we buy, where we go and when, and what we can do while there.
Please donate.
The Republic you save may be your own.


34 posted on 05/10/2012 8:18:48 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson