Yeah, since these kids were born via surrogate, Mitt won't want them to have a future, right? Honestly, do you also contend that people who adopt children don't have traditional family values, as well? How about people who foster, do they have traditional family values?
This falls into one of those categories of things we don’t really want or need to know. But now that we do know, could they elaborate so we can dissect this more? lol What did this surrogacy entail? Did they take put a fertilized egg (of Tagg and wife) into another woman? Did Tagg inject his sperm into another woman? Did Tagg collect his sperm and have it injected into another woman? So many options. I admit I just looked this up on Wikipedia.
Congratulations and best wishes for the Romney family.
I have grown children
They do things that I may disagree with
Does that reflect on my values??
The latest in “outsourcing”...
Isn't that essentially the point for watching porn movies? ... Never mind...
The actual article referenced in FR has nothing about just why the parents decided to use a surrogate.
There is no information on the procedure to produce biological children out of a surrogate mother. That leaves fundamental questions unanswered. I guess that it is more convenient.
How about hers? Was it her egg or surrogate's?
The same surrogate was used for the twins carried their youngest son Jonathan, who was born in August of 2010. Their other three children were not born via surrogacy.
Sounds like they themselves had 3 biological girls. I get the idea that boys are more important to Mormons...thus the attempt to have 3 boys via surrogate.
(sarcasm - duh!)
Some of the responses on this thread turn my stomach. Some couples desperately want children but the wife miscarries and cannot carry a baby to term. No wonder when I direct some people to FR they tell me they came here and it looks like a bunch of crazies. Maybe they ran across a thread like this.