Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MachIV

That’s what I’m thinking as well. Can you imagine a debate between RINOmney and Obama? “But Gov. Romney, you did the same thing as me....you did the same thing as me.....you supported the same thing as me....” That’s all Obama has to say and nobody could prove him wrong. The GOP can kiss my a** for pushing that putz.


13 posted on 04/30/2012 4:48:39 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Some day our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: GrandJediMasterYoda
With due respect, and with the preface that I voted for Newt here in Georgia, this 'Obama only did on a national level what Mitt did in Massachusetts at the state level' doesn't really cut it with me.

My reading of the US Constitution, its founders' intent, and the many instances of each amendment stipulating that the Federal Government shall not.......et al, just reinforces my belief that the intent was to give STATES the power to decide their will, with many, many safeguards to them by capping and restraining the power of the Federal Government to infringe on the rights of states.

That said, if the blue blue state of Massachusetts wanted to hogtie their residents and cripple their futures, it is that state's right, provided they can pass muster through the USOC on review. It is not, however, Hussein's right to inflict that rights abortion on the rest of us without collective states rights' consent

25 posted on 04/30/2012 5:06:57 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
But Gov. Romney, you did the same thing as me....you did the same thing as me.....you supported the same thing as me....”

Re: the subject of Romneycare vs. Obamacare, I think that Romney could at least say that his version was the best thing for Massachusetts. As conservatives, we may disagree with the approach, but we're either for states' rights or we're not. At least Romney didn't pass his plan in the middle of the night, while giving away 100s of millions in various vote-buying schemes.

68 posted on 04/30/2012 6:25:41 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a filibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson