Replies

End of the day, Zimmerman engaged in actions that lead to the shooting, not only did he do so, he did so after repeated advice not to.

You're following the erroneous story line as misreported by the MSM.

I don't know what "repeated advice" you're referring to. Are you talking about the dispatcher's words, "We don't need you to do that" ?

Remember Zim's reply to that? It was this: "OK."

Call the dispatcher's words "advice" if you like, but I'm not sure there is a clear, before-the-fact interpretation we can put on that phrase. Even if you choose to interpret it as an "order," Zim was under no obligation to follow it.

In any case, that is moot, because there is ZERO evidence that Zim continued to follow and to confront Martin.

In fact, the evidence shows that Zim's story that he was retreating to his vehicle, when confronted and attacked by Martin, is true.

Check out the map of the scene at www.wagist.com, and then tell me if you still believe the MSM's lies about who confronted whom.

I wholey agree Zimmerman was under no requirement to follow the advice of the dispatcher. Never said he was legally obligated to follow their advice.

What I said was, he chose not to follow that advice, just like he chose to leave his vehicle in the first place, instead of just calling it in and waiting.

Zimmerman’s got culpability here, trying to claim otherwise is just living in denial.

Zimmerman should face manslaughter charges, and frankly, I suspect he’s going to lose. Time will tell.

fact, the evidence shows that Zim's story that he was retreating to his vehicle, when confronted and attacked by Martin, is true. Check out the map of the scene at www.wagist.com, and then tell me if you still believe the MSM's lies about who confronted whom. ________________________ Waglist - Evidence that Trayvon Martin Doubled Back Map claims GZ's location was from the first encounter. SayS GZ was parked at 'C' location.