Your last post prior to mine (#68) says this: “It's no secret the idea is to prevent Romney taking the state...though it's almost too late for that. I will soon be voting and though not in Santorums court if he looks to take the state over Newt then I will vote for SAntorum to keep Romney out. But not happy to do so.”
I can and do respect that position. I have just publicly questioned your motives and I need to think more carefully before I do that or something similar in the future.
Again, I apologize. I was wrong, and I'm sincerely sorry.
Most of what I wrote was legitimate, but this paragraph was both unnecessary and inappropriate: “By the way, you are still a Gingrich backer, right? Would you like to explain to us how Romney winning Pennsylvania will help Gingrich defeat Romney? If you're simply providing information, that's certainly a good thing, and I'm glad to read these articles. But I can't see how it helps Gingrich to harm Santorum in Pennsylvania — looks to me like a Romney win in Pennsylvania hurts Gingrich and Santorum both by continuing to add to Romney's delegate count.”
Assessing motives is very difficult. I know better than to do that, and my post was out of line.