Most of what I wrote was legitimate, but this paragraph was both unnecessary and inappropriate: “By the way, you are still a Gingrich backer, right? Would you like to explain to us how Romney winning Pennsylvania will help Gingrich defeat Romney? If you're simply providing information, that's certainly a good thing, and I'm glad to read these articles. But I can't see how it helps Gingrich to harm Santorum in Pennsylvania — looks to me like a Romney win in Pennsylvania hurts Gingrich and Santorum both by continuing to add to Romney's delegate count.”
Assessing motives is very difficult. I know better than to do that, and my post was out of line.
Thinking before typing is good for the same reasons aiming before firing is good. If I don't have the time to think through what I'm writing, then I need to wait until I have that time.
Again, caww, my apologies. I blew it.
Over and out for a while.