Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coral links ice to ancient 'mega flood'
www.physorg.com ^ | 03-30-2012 | Provided by Oxford University

Posted on 03/30/2012 12:44:46 PM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Theoria; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Thanks Red Badger.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

21 posted on 09/08/2012 6:01:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...

 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Red Badger. Wow, I missed this one! Sorry, and sorry as well to all who could have been pinged in MARCH. Yow.
Coral off Tahiti has linked the collapse of massive ice sheets 14,600 years ago to a dramatic and rapid rise in global sea-levels of around 14 metres. Previous research could not accurately date the sea-level rise but now an Aix-Marseille University-led team, including Oxford University scientists Alex Thomas and Gideon Henderson, has confirmed that the event occurred 14,650-14,310 years ago at the same time as a period of rapid climate change known as the Bølling warming.
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


22 posted on 09/08/2012 6:01:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
During the Bølling warming high latitudes of the Northern hemisphere warmed as much as 15 degrees Celsius in a few tens of decades.

Why do they use tortured terms such as " a few tens of decades"? Wouldn't "a few hundred years" suffice?

23 posted on 09/08/2012 6:53:45 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (CREDO QUIA ABSURDUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Makes it sound more imminent......and ominous....


24 posted on 09/08/2012 7:11:42 PM PDT by Red Badger (Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MrB
It's very well known that sea level went up about 300' at the end on the last Ice Age.

There is no scientific evidence that it ever went up the 28,000' it would have had to in order to cover the tallest mountain.

25 posted on 09/08/2012 8:05:08 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1328 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; SunkenCiv

not to worry! The One has promised to stop the seas from rising. But maybe he won’t do it if he doesn’t get re-elected.


26 posted on 09/08/2012 10:43:24 PM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk oMnly to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Why do you assume the mountains we see today were always there?

And oh yes I always love the use of the word “scientific” as a shut up word. Since I started noticing its use in this manner I think of it the same way a liberal use “racism”.


27 posted on 09/09/2012 1:46:42 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working fors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I don’t. The Himalayan mountains were seafloor before India slammed into the underbelly of Asia.

But that was a long, slow grinding and ongoing collision. It didn’t happen since 4004 BC.


28 posted on 09/09/2012 1:53:08 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1329 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: docbnj; married21; Claude; All

It is entirely possible that there was more than one major flood. At the end of the Ice Age, the sea level was at least 400 feet lower than today. The depth of the Straits of Gibralter are around 400 feet. A massive rapid rise in water level could have entered the Straits (with less depth then) and rapidly scoured it to the current depth while causing massive flooding throughout the Mediterranean basin. There could have been a second influx of water following the melting after the Younger Dryas around 11,000 years ago.

Scientist often have disagreements over interpreting physical evidence. Just saw this interesting article on disagreement over the meaning of certain formations on Mars which may support or deny the existence of substantial amounts of water in the past.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/mars-magma-water_n_1870939.html?show_comment_id=186197003#comment_186197003


29 posted on 09/11/2012 9:48:06 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson