Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Some 'Brand New Players' Might Emerge At GOP Convention
WWNO ^ | Marcj 22. 2012 | NPR People: Mark Memmott

Posted on 03/22/2012 1:08:31 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

6:51 Audio

Saying that Mitt Romney may not be able to "grind his way toward the nomination" despite a huge fundraising advantage, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told NPR today that he sees no reason to exit the Republican presidential race and that there's a chance of a new contender emerging at the party's convention in August.

"I'm not so sure you wouldn't get a series of brand new players" stepping forward during a brokered convention, he told Morning Edition co-host Steve Inskeep.

Or, he said, he might emerge as the convention's choice. Gingrich said he expects to end the primary season with the third most delegates — with Romney at No. 1 and Rick Santorum at No. 2.

Gingrich also repeated criticisms he has leveled at Romney throughout the campaign. First, that "conservative voters are deeply worried about Gov. Romney." Second, that if the former Massachusetts governor is heavily outspending his GOP rivals and "is barely winning" in the battle for the nomination, there's "no reason to think Romney is going to with the general election" against President Obama.

More from the interview is due on Thursday's broadcast of the show. We'll add the as-broadcast version of Steve's conversation with the former House speaker to the top of this post after it airs. Click here to find an NPR station that broadcasts or streams the show.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: convention; delegates; gingrich2012; gopprimary; palin; sarahpalin; west
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: itsahoot
How dare you say that I heard O’Reilly himself tells us we were idiots if we thought that FOX was rooting for Romney.

But since he claims we ARE idiots half the time, is that his coded way of confirming that they are?

61 posted on 03/22/2012 5:34:13 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

So who do we need to vote for in Nebraska, Wyoming, etc in order to make sure that Mitt doesn’t win? Santorum? How many states has he won so far? Gingrich has won one?

And how do we get the R’s to admit that Santorum won Iowa, like he did?


62 posted on 03/22/2012 5:36:35 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Josephat; Amntn
I’m starting to think that Sarah and Newt have a plan, or, maybe, have had a plan all along.

Here's what I posted in another thread, plus a couple additional thoughts:

I've been developing a suspicion/fantasy that the plan is to keep WrongMee from getting over the top during the primaries, so there is some degree or other of brokered convention. Then Newt proposes a Palin/Gingrich or Gingrich/Palin ticket, and asks uncommitted and newly unbound (assuming they make it past round 1) delegates to vote for that ticket. A number of things are making me wonder about this:


63 posted on 03/22/2012 6:00:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

She is really the only choice. She will at least try to change everything. Not saying she can get it done. But i don’t believe anyone else will even try.


64 posted on 03/22/2012 6:04:35 PM PDT by carjic (Fed up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The GOP needs an enema.

NO!! They're more than enough $hit NOW.

65 posted on 03/22/2012 6:06:13 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Oops! Mean to say they EMIT more than enough now.


66 posted on 03/22/2012 6:07:43 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Imagine liberal heads exploding on live tv.

Sounds messy, but I'm willing to make that sacrifice.

67 posted on 03/22/2012 6:15:33 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
I am willing to roll the dice.

I can't stand any of the current guys.

68 posted on 03/22/2012 7:18:05 PM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

Sun Tzu


69 posted on 03/22/2012 7:41:29 PM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (Time to Reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USARightSide
Reading the rules previously posted, it would seem that there could be a motion made to suspend the rules at the very start of the convention. If that passed, then these 5 state requirements would not be in force.
As for Mitt, a good 1/3 of his delegates now come from states where he will lose to Obbabbabama and those coming up such as California are sure losers. Mitts delegates do not reflect at all the electoral votes he might have a shot at.
70 posted on 03/22/2012 8:08:26 PM PDT by lag along
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lag along

You might have something there - - -

One thing now seems sure - - it won’t be Jeb Bush popping up at a brokered convention - - -


71 posted on 03/23/2012 2:32:48 AM PDT by USARightSide ( S U P P O R T I N G O U R T R O O P S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

>> Newt doesn’t know what he is talking about here.

LOL, and there you are, the lone voice of doom in the middle of a bodacious Newt thread... Nonetheless, good to have you here, FRiend.


72 posted on 03/23/2012 2:36:07 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

My tag, eh, eh? I know something...


73 posted on 03/23/2012 2:38:03 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Obama will be outed as not qualified, not a natural born citizen, then so will Santorum and Romney, leaving Newt as the only constutionally qualified candidate in the primaries, so he will have won all of them. He will be the nominee, and Sarah Palin the VP. A dominant Repub majority for the Senate and House will follow.


74 posted on 03/23/2012 5:23:52 AM PDT by plenipotentiary (Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Guess you’ll have to settle for Myth, then.


75 posted on 03/23/2012 5:30:57 AM PDT by Joe the Pimpernel (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to slaughter anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

I will vote for Rick Santorum in the general election if I have to. But if Newt Gingrich dropping out will help Rick Santorum be the nominee, then NO way. He would lose badly. Now, I understand how important it is to stop Romney, but not with Rick. It is either Newt or an emerging candidate from the convention for me.


76 posted on 03/23/2012 7:52:27 AM PDT by dt57 (illerate, noobie....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: USARightSide

I am indeed a Sarah fan, but I truely believe she needs some work.

I will vote for Rick Santorum in the general if I have to, but he will lose.

A Rick Santorum loss would be better than a Romney win for me. Romney might win the general election be would be an God awful president.

This is where I am with Rick Santorum’s recent statement: Mitt Romney would be worse than Obama. Go Rick!

But Newt is the one.


77 posted on 03/23/2012 7:57:18 AM PDT by dt57 (illerate, noobie....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
On Super Tuesday I was watching the coverage on CNN and they had someone in Alaska at Sarah's polling place. They stopped her and asked her a question about being at the convention. I wasn't paying attention and I don't know exactly what the question was but Sarah answered “you never know” with one of her sly grins.

The interviewer seemed to think there was something newsworthy there and the people in the studio said something to the effect that maybe Sarah had something up her sleeve but then they dropped it for some kind of breaking news and never brought it up again.

I wish I had been paying closer attention and knew what the question was but I have a hard time watching CNN without watering it down by doing something else when its on.

78 posted on 03/23/2012 8:31:39 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dt57
Newt Gingrich dropping out will help Rick Santorum be the nominee, then NO way.

Newt dropping out of winner take all primaries would not change his delegate count one bit, but it might deny Romney the delegates. How is that not a win, win?

Newt is barely beating Ron Paul, and in some case not, you need to accept that, else we put Romney against Zero, and I really, really doubt he could win.

79 posted on 03/23/2012 12:35:17 PM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“I doubt they would improve it. They have too many moderates —who were afraid to jump into the fray — waiting in the wings.”

OK, what about Ryan?


80 posted on 03/23/2012 10:02:03 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson