Posted on 03/03/2012 8:10:08 AM PST by yellowhammer
Edited on 03/03/2012 8:51:12 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if we found out she is a lesbian.
The issue is that the student insurance offered by Georgetown did not include birth control coverage because as a Catholic institution it would violate their religious doctrine.I would assume the policy that does not include birth control coverage is cheaper than one that does. Student health insurance policies that include birth control coverage are readily available with all private health insurers.So she could easily have obtained a policy that included birth control coverage and paid the extra premium with any number of student health insurance carriers. Instead she insisted that students attending school to get an education rather than sleeping around should be forced to pay the extra premium to have coverage for something they have no intention of ever using. I guess freedom of choice to her means who she chooses to sleep with that evening rather than individuals having the right to choose coverage needs.Welcome to the world of Obamacare mandates.
I like Rush Limbaugh, but in this particular case, the truth of this woman is going to be a lot harder to get out because he used a particular word to describe her.
I thought his “prostitute” line was inspired; it would have gotten the same people outraged, but then the explanation would have highlighted the point — the she was asking for other people to pay so she could have sex.
But calling her a “slut” didn’t advance the argument, and instead took focus off of our personal liberties (including the woman’s personal liberty to have sex whenever and with whomever she wanted) and onto “men trying to demean women”, which the “slut” term certainly did.
I’m currently working on re-wording her statement to Congress, and using firearms/ammunition instead of contraception/women’s health.
If there are any faster typists out there, here’s the link to the original statement:
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf
i think Sleep Number’s ad rates just went up to be back on Rush’s show
Batteries, yes. {Excuse me, I couldn’t resist}.
She never knows where her next partner's strap-on may have been.
Does anyone know if she portrayed herself as a 23 yr old 3-yr student to the Congressional Committee?
When did this (23 yr old) tag pop up?
Rush spent the last 2 days on Fluke...exclusively. Even on “Open Line Friday” there was not one caller allowed in to open discussion regarding Arpaio’s findings.
Rush...you are starting to look like a coward on this. If anyone can provide a rational discussion withpout going down the lunacy path, it is you Rush.
Here is a link to her linked in preview (I am not going to sign up to see any more)
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sandra-fluke/1/324/278
Just goes to show, never NEVER trust the news media. They’ll never tell you the truth and only promote a liberal agenda.
:: linked in professional page listing LA as her area of practise ::
“A note too follow “SO”
Tea, a drink with jam and bread”
This would be the same Sandra Flake (my spelling) that wants free birth control at the same time her tuition is $60,000 a year? She can take a flying leap. Rush, even though right in every word he said, is going to pay dearly. They have been after him since day one. The sharks smell blood in the water.
Told by whom? What are you talking about?
self-ping
Had Rush not said what he said the way he said it, the broads who cooked up this scam would have gone unquestioned. Rush knows what he has to do and his execution is brilliant. He has the left eating dog doo out of the palm of his hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.