[edge919]

The judge didn’t back up his beliefs. He denied that the plaintiffs evidence had any probative value. Obama submitted nothing. There’s no way to understand a judge who accepts nothing as proof of anything.

[butterdezillion]

“Judge’s knowledge”.

It’s allowed by sharia.

[Harlan1196]

Can you understand a judge that was prepared to give the plaintiffs everything they wanted? All they had to do was say “yes” and victory was theirs. If this was rigged why did he offer the default judgment?