Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Sandbags the Archbishop
Townhall.com ^ | January 31, 2012 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 01/31/2012 12:10:15 PM PST by Kaslin

At the end of Sunday mass at the church this writer attends in Washington, D.C., the pastor asked the congregation to remain for a few minutes.

Then, on the instructions of Cardinal Archbishop Donald Wuerl, the pastor proceeded to read a letter.

In the letter, the Church denounced the Obama administration for ordering all Catholic schools, hospitals and social services to provide, in their health insurance coverage for employes, free contraceptives, free sterilizations and free "morning-after" pills.

Parishioners were urged to contact their representatives in Congress to bring about a reversal of President Obama's new policy.

Now, not only is this a battle the Church must fight, it is a battle the Church can win if it has the moral stamina to say the course.

In forcing the Church to violate its own principles, Obama has committed an act of federal aggression, crossing the line between church and state to appease his ACLU and feminist allies, while humiliating the Catholic bishops.

Should the Church submit, its moral authority in America would disappear.

Now, undeniably, the church milquetoast of past decades that refused to discipline pro-abortion Catholics allowed the impression to form that while the hierarchy may protest, eventually it will go along to get along with a Democratic Party that was once home to most Catholics.

Obama's problem today is that not only is he forcing the Church to violate her conscience, he dissed the highest prelate in America.

In November, New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, held what he describes as an "extraordinarily friendly" meeting with Obama at the White House.

The president assured the archbishop of his respect for the Church, and the archbishop came away persuaded Obama would never force the Church to adopt any policy that would violate her principles.

Ten days ago, Obama sandbagged the archbishop.

He informed Cardinal-designate Dolan by phone that, with the sole concession of the Church being given an extra year, to August 2013, to comply, the new policy, as set down by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, will be imposed. All social and educational institutions of the Catholic church will offer health insurance covering birth control, or face fines.

"In effect, the president is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences," said Archbishop Dolan, who went on:

"To force American citizens to choose between violating their consciences and forgoing their health care is literally unconscionable. ... This represents a challenge and a compromise of our religious liberty."

Where do Obama and Sebelius get the power to do this?

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law on March 23, 2010, the colloquial name for which is "Obamacare."

NARAL Pro-Choice America is celebrating the new policy. Planned Parenthood's president, Cecile Richards, calls it a "health care issue ... based on what's best for women's health." Others have argued that many Catholic women practice birth control.

But that Catholics choose to ignore doctrine does not justify the U.S. government imposing on Catholic institutions a policy that violates Catholic teaching.

Even Washington Post liberal E.J. Dionne, in a Jan. 30 column titled "Obama's Breach of Faith," charges that the president "threw his progressive Catholic allies under the bus. ...

"Speaking as an American liberal who believes that religious pluralism imposes certain obligations on government ... the Church's leaders had a right to ask for broader relief from a contraception mandate that would require it to act against its own teachings."

Why did Obama do it?

Facing a close race for a second term, Obama chose not to antagonize his left. Yet he must have known that siding with them meant leaving Archbishop Dolan with egg all over his face. Obama, calculatedly, came down on the side of those he believes to be more crucial to his re-election.

This affront should tell the Catholic hierarchy, if they did not already know, where they stand in the party of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Kathleen Sebilius. And where they sit -- in the back of the bus.

Yet if the bishops will look upon this crisis of conscience, this insult, as an opportunity, they can effect its reversal and recapture a measure of the moral authority they have lately lost.

Not only should the bishops file suit in federal court against the president and Sebelius for violation of the constitutional principle of separation of church and state, they should inform the White House that no bishop will give an invocation at the Democratic Convention.

Then, they should inform the White House that in the last two weeks of the 2012 campaign, priests in every parish will read from the pulpit at Sunday mass a letter denouncing Obama as anti-Catholic for denying the Church its right to live according to its beliefs.

If Obama loses the Catholic vote, he loses the election.

The White House will come around, fast. Rely upon it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; catholicchurch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Kaslin

Archbishop Dolan should have known better than to trust someone who attended Jeremiah Wrights Church for 20 years and never heard any hatred out of Wright.

I wouldn’t trust Obama feed my dog—if I had one.


21 posted on 01/31/2012 1:20:11 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

> the archbishop came away persuaded Obama would never force
> the Church to adopt any policy that would violate her
> principles.

The archbishop has not been paying attention.

0bama and his friends have already forced the Catholic church out of adoption services by requiring the Church to allow gays to adopt. The church refused to comply and can no longer provide adoption services.

The Church has been in retreat on the most compelling moral issues of our times for at least a generation.


22 posted on 01/31/2012 1:32:00 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well this may take the calling in of Rome/Vatican to call 1600 PA Avenue.


23 posted on 01/31/2012 1:33:26 PM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Do Methodist hospitals offer abortions?


24 posted on 01/31/2012 2:39:22 PM PST by Judges Gone Wild ("A republic, if you can keep it." - Benjamin Franklin www.ronpaul2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbear8

Holy Smokes I must have missed that reporting by the any MSM outlets and even the British papers did not give me notice.


25 posted on 01/31/2012 2:39:49 PM PST by BilLies ( (ABCBSNBCNN, NYTimes, WaPOSt , etc., hates your Traditional American guts!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“If Obama loses the Catholic vote, he loses the election.

The White House will come around, fast. Rely upon it.”

Zero seems to have a habit of doubling down on stupid. So I wouldn’t bet the farm on it.


26 posted on 01/31/2012 4:38:51 PM PST by gemoftheocean (...geez, this all seems so straight forward and logical to me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BilLies
This is from the LAT in 2008-

Recently, Kathleen Sebelius has run afoul of Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City in Kansas. The bishop has told the governor that she “should stop receiving Communion until she publicly repudiates her support of abortion. In a column for his diocesan newspaper, Naumann wrote that he was particularly outraged by Sebelius’ veto of an antiabortion bill, which she--and nearly every legal scholar who examined it--believed was unconstitutional.

Naumann dismissed Sebelius’ insistence that she personally opposes abortion, and her assertion that because of her pro-adoption policies and improvements in public health services for pregnant women, Kansas’ abortion rate has declined significantly. The prelate said that in a private conversation he’d had with Sebelius, the governor said she was “obligated to uphold state and federal laws and court decisions related to abortion.” Naumann said he demanded that she show “a similar sense of obligation to honor divine law.”

Source: Tim Rutten, L.A. Times op-Ed , May 28, 2008

Obviously this is written from a very liberal slant, but even they reported what Bishop Naumann told her.

27 posted on 01/31/2012 5:05:05 PM PST by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Catholics that vote for Obama are CINOs plus they are dancing on the trapdoors of HELL.


28 posted on 01/31/2012 5:07:57 PM PST by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
Lot of Catholics are Democrats....Catholics get what they deserve I say...you voted for the guy now you all are having an attack or feigned morality? After Notre Dame Incident, covering the cross, after the One said he has no issue with late term abortions (the ones where knife is inserted in the back of neck of partially born baby)...yeah, you really thought this guy would give you all a religious waiver
29 posted on 01/31/2012 5:10:26 PM PST by Engedi (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Hey Bishops....NEVER....NEVER >>>EVER TRUST WHAT A DEMOCRAT TELLS YOU.......FOOLS....and NOT foold FOR Christ!! FOOLS>


30 posted on 01/31/2012 5:11:21 PM PST by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pbear8

Thanks very much. Filed.


31 posted on 01/31/2012 6:20:15 PM PST by BilLies ( (ABCBSNBCNN, NYTimes, WaPOSt , etc., hates your Traditional American guts!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Church has brought this on themselves by not excommunicating baby killers like Nancy Pelosi. And for their open borders stance as well. The Bishops have bent over for the DemocRATS for so many years, and on so many issues, Obama and the DemocRATS know that the Catholics will get in line before November.

So......Lay with the dogs, wake up with fleas.


32 posted on 01/31/2012 8:23:50 PM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems; All

The Church has brought this on themselves by not excommunicating baby killers like Nancy Pelosi and Kathleen Sebelius. And for the Church’s stance on open borders as well. The Bishops have bent over for the DemocRATS for so many years, and on so many issues, Obama and the DemocRATS know that the Catholics will get in line before November.

So......Lay with the dogs, wake up with fleas.


33 posted on 01/31/2012 8:30:28 PM PST by no dems (I'm more concerned with America's future than I am Newt's past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson