[Labyrinthos]

Presenter is struggling with the document and evidence. Not polished. Judge and audience shaking their heads. I understand the challenge the presenter has, a ton of evidence that is intertwined and hard to make heads or tails of standing by itself, but the preponderance of all the evidence is what is important that it all points to the same conclusion. I am not getting my hopes up based on all of this...at least it is being heard...better than nothing I hope

She's a horrible courtroom attorney. I've hired second year law students with better skills and focus.

She should be focusing only upon the citizenship of Odumbo's parents and the impact of Odumbo's Indonesia experience and whether that resulted in a revocation of his USA citizenship. These facts are mostly undisputed. Then argue the law.

[An American!]

Agreed...
The focus was not on the law and how what was done and is being done is contrary to that law. Instead she tried to dump everything into the record that might disparage the defendant. Not the best approach in my opinion.
Credit to her for tenacity, but no credit for lack of organization, lack of targeted testimony, lack of true expert witnesses, etc. Hire some new expert who has not been involved in or labeled a ‘birther’ and have that person study the evidence and provide their findings, their review of previous investigations and opinions etc
Anyway...it is in the judges hands now and we must pray that he can make sense of it all and judge accurately based on the letter of the law.