Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2012 9:34:19 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Nachum

Marianne Gingrich appears to give the Main Stream Media an interview every couple of years over the last 15 to 20 years just to dump on former husband.


2 posted on 01/19/2012 9:39:32 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Marianne Gingrich appears to give the Main Stream Media an interview every couple of years over the last 15 to 20 years just to dump on her former husband.


3 posted on 01/19/2012 9:39:44 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz said a mouthful when he posited that Marianne Gingrich does not say anything in the new interview that she hasn’t said in the past.

I'm reserving judgment until I see the interview. What someone told Kurtz may or may not be true.

4 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:02 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Not to mention this get some Democrat votes. Particularly the folks who voted for Edwards and Clinton.


5 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:21 AM PST by Leep (Paul/Vantura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
So we're going to hear that Newt's ex-wife (with whom he had an affair while still married to his first wife) claims that Newt likes to fool around with other women while he's married.
In other news, 2 + 2 = 4
6 posted on 01/19/2012 9:40:34 AM PST by Riodacat (And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

“Hell has no fury like a woman scorned”


7 posted on 01/19/2012 9:44:05 AM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Media sees Newt rising in the polls in SC and has to do what it can to protect Obama by protecting Romney until the GOP convention.


8 posted on 01/19/2012 9:44:55 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Marianne is simply proving that she has no class and that she would have been a lousy first lady.


10 posted on 01/19/2012 9:47:08 AM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This story is aimed squarely at women voters; which confirms the vision and wisdom of our Founders in not granting that right in the Constitution.


11 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:12 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Gingrich and his “throw this reputedly conservative candidate against a wall and see if he sticks” bandwagon have only themselves to blame. Newt’s antics were well known before he gave up the speakership almost a decade ago. There were a different set of rules for Democrats than Republicans then and its wishful thinking to claim that it’s different now. That said, Obama’s bunch is very skillfully manipulating events. If you believe Ann Coulter, Axelrod and Co. have been using the same technique since Obama first sought political office. Republicans need to open their minds and start playing by new rules. Or come to think of it, old rules. Brokered convention. Nominate a person that isn’t in the current weak field who is acceptable to all of the other contestants. They need to give voters something credible to vote for and resume attacking Obama’s record relentlessly. Otherwise, Obama will accidently get reelected, and people will give up on the GOP when they should be abandoning the Democrats.


12 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:17 AM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
NEWT AND HERMAN, NEWT AND HERMAN
13 posted on 01/19/2012 9:48:21 AM PST by FrankR (When you vote based on race...race is all you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What’s the difference between Bill Clinton vs. Newt Gingrich handling of sexually tainted information on them? Newt didn’t hire a squad of goons to go out and “rough up” to shut up the accuser.


17 posted on 01/19/2012 9:53:54 AM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The liberals prefer Democrat candidates who are serial cheaters on their wives, or who accumulate hundreds of millions of dollars WHILE they’re president. No double standard here. /sarc


18 posted on 01/19/2012 9:54:41 AM PST by Spok (Who is Sam Zemurray?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
This is the same "high moral values" organization that was exposed in the NY Observer story about the retirement of executive Mimi Gurbst?

-PJ

21 posted on 01/19/2012 9:56:51 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I just watched a clip from the interview and she seems like a very bitter, unpleasant woman. People may watch this and feel sorry for Newt.


27 posted on 01/19/2012 10:00:15 AM PST by carola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Marianne Gingrich has already floated this spew twice. If it hasn’t sunk Newt by now its not going to. Who even watches “Nightline” anymore. I didn’t even know it was still on the air. Most people will be watching the debate tonight. I think “Nightline” is on at 10PM after the debate so as long as Newt keeps hitting it out of the park on the debate tonight I don’t think this interview is going to be much of a problem.


28 posted on 01/19/2012 10:01:00 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

People supporting Newt need to be prepared when arguing with Rats for the inevitable “I thought republicans valued character and morals in their leaders?” You are going to get all of Newt well known failing shoved in your face 24/7, if he is the nominee. I am not advising anyone to not vote for Newt, I am just saying that you had better be prepared for an attack on his character and morals that can not be refuted. Neither can the charge of hypocrisy over Clintons’ impeachment. If you go all in for Newt you are going all in for Newts baggage too, just saying.


29 posted on 01/19/2012 10:02:28 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Newt must be shaking in his boots, other wise why all this dumping on his ex, last I head she wasn’t the one screwing around.


31 posted on 01/19/2012 10:07:06 AM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Tell you what since she is airing out Newt’s dirty laundry... She must really hate that guy to do this. You can’t drawl any other conclusion.

I guess we can call Newt a hypocrite since he writes books about saving money, but then at the very same time turns around and spends half a million dollars on a piece of jewelry for the woman that cheated on his last wife.

This is really though the least of our concerns with Newt. I don’t care for his man made global warming belief. I don’t care if he says that was a mistake. Remember he ONLY said that after ever conservative was calling him out for it.


32 posted on 01/19/2012 10:07:42 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Disney Corp is now part of Axelrod's
smear and slime machine.

Just like the Chicago mob.

We have called down this
curse from YHvH on ourselves.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

34 posted on 01/19/2012 10:10:53 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson