Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Take the Pledge, Support the Nominee [as long as it's not Romney or Paul. JimRob]
Human Events ^ | 12/23/2011 | Roger Hedgecock

Posted on 12/24/2011 2:43:58 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last
To: chrisnj
I am not for Romney, but....

Ah yes, the ol' "but" statement clause... ; )

That self promoting, yet wishy washy, John Edwards wannabe whore will NEVER EVER get my vote and I can't even give Ron Paul such consideration!

161 posted on 12/25/2011 10:21:45 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Each of the four would be better than Obongo, yes.

Absolutely and IF we have to settle for the likes of Romney, then we are already lost!

If we are going to have a battle for our direction as a people politically then we may as well have at least two discerning directions to chose from!

162 posted on 12/25/2011 10:29:59 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Even if a Mitt twit presidency turned out to be as bad as what you have portrayed here, very doubtful, it would be better than another round of Obama, much better if we can regain control of the Senate. The Republican Party isn’t going to be destroyed, but from the perspective of someone who is voting third party, why would it matter? More votes for you. I’ll fight Romney as long as he is not the nominee. America deserves much better. Once our candidate has been chosen, anything that assures Obama’s reelection is unacceptable.

We go through this every election. It’s exactly the same reasoning that was used by Perot voters to justify two terms of Clinton. I was fully prepared not to vote for McCain before Palin got on board, and I wouldn’t have, because I believed he would destroy the Republican Party, and that belief was probably correct. However, I underestimated the extent that Obama would be allowed to destroy America. Another round of this will make the destruction of the Republican Party of no consequence.

Let’s do everything we can to make sure Romney doesn’t get the nomination. That’s the way all of us can win this reoccurring dilemma of not wanting to vote for the establishment progressive.


163 posted on 12/25/2011 10:37:28 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: heiss
Everything can be repealed later, except amnesty.

You forgot debt.

164 posted on 12/25/2011 10:52:52 AM PST by omni-scientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
What if it's November and it is Romney? And he's thrown out a bunch of conservative speak during the summer and fall?
Can people swallow the vomit in the back of their throats and vote for him?

And this would be if it actually is real decision next November; and not a armchair one now.

Decisions, decisions....

165 posted on 12/25/2011 10:56:48 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hmm, 2 crappy candidates instead of just 1? I think my head would! explode. :D


166 posted on 12/25/2011 10:57:59 AM PST by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I don’t think the Republican party has clue one, how close it is to waking up one morning, and not having anyone registered in it’s ranks any longer.

Nationwide registration numbers look quite anemic from what I understand.

Source please? There's no need for unwarranted pessimism.

Battleground-State Voters Leaving the Democratic Party

Let the Tea Party movement take over the GOP. The GOP didn't lose conservative voters in 2006 and 2008. The moderates and independents smacked them in those years. They came back in 2010.

167 posted on 12/25/2011 2:37:50 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

A 3rd party candidate is just as much a threat to Obama as it is to the GOP nominee.


168 posted on 12/25/2011 5:00:36 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis
I don't know where the years go but I am too old to be involved in forming a third party. Preserving the GOP as a POTENTIAL opposition party to the Demonrats REQUIRES the defeat of Romney whether in the primaries or in the general election. When I lived in Connecticut, I watched this worthless, braindead, trust fund baby SOB campaigning to the left of Turd Kennedy.

The Federalist Party died. The Whig Party died. The Know Nothing Party died. In each case, the cause was stupid elitism and ubergrabbiness. If the GOP insists on dying, so be it. I have voted Republican in every POTUS election in my life. I voted for Nixon when Wallace was a better man. I voted for the imbecile Gerald Ford. I voted twice for Bush the Elder (clueless to the max as POTUS). I voted for Dole (tax collector for the welfare state. I voted for McCain (or actually for Sarah Palin). I will NOT vote fr Mitt Romney. In my state, there is no election for governor or US senator. I will vote for Don Manzullo who is my fine Congressman. I have not decided to vote for my worthless allegedly "Republican" state representative and state senator. If the GOP wants my vote this time, it had better not nominate the Mittwit or Huntsman or paleoPaulie nor dredge up some other "moderate" if and when Mittwit and Huntsman fail.

As we in Illinois know at least as well as you do, Obozo is one evil SOB. We also know what happens when the GOP goes full RINO. I am not really sure that calling the Mittwit a RINO is not an insult to RINOs.

I have become one of those actual conservatives who will have a revolutionary GOP candidate prepared to put an end to the despicable excuse for government we have been suffering since Ronaldus Maximus was term limited out in favor of Bush the Brainless Elder OR so\imply refuse to vote for any more Demonrats disguised as "Republican" moderates. Rule or ruin. Upset the game board. I am also more than sick of the braindead mushball wing of the GOP buying nominations, of Tokyo Rove, of Mitch McConnell, of John Boehner, and of each and every RINO bastard in the US Senate.

If the GOP nominates the Mittwit, there will be no such thing as "our candidate." It is not a dilemma. I will NOT vote for any "progressive" Republican again.

Example of attitude: I regard Ron Paul as a treasonweasel of the first order and an imminent danger to the babies and family values. I have spent a lot of time here attacking the worthless SOB. If I lived in Virginia and they do not change the party rules to allow GOP primary voters to vote for any candidates but Mittwit and the Galveston serial liar, I would vote for even paleoPaulie to punish the Mittwit for trying to use money as a substitute for principle. Other conservatives in other states should unite behind Anybody but Romney candidates, one per state, and stop playing into the TARP kings' hands. Our tax money is used to cushion these bastards against any adverse consequences of their own greed while the entire nation suffers economically other than them. Then they use that tax subsidy to export jobs, buy GOP nominations and policy and generally screw the general public and GOP conservatives in particular.

I am not playing their game any more. Mittwit can go straight to hell along with his polo playing pals.

Regaining control of the Senate does not do it either because Republican control is not conservative control. Lisa Moocowski doea not represent me. Nor does Illinois's own Nancyboy Kirk. We can do without LAMAR!!! Alexander, Robert Corker, Richard Lugar, Richard Shelby, John Cornyn, that Hutchinson creature, Mitch McConnell, Roy Blunt, Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Saxby Chambliss and a number of other senior Senate whores. Obozo is not destroying the country by himself (and Romney would be just as bad) and he has plenty of spineless GOP Senate and House co-conspirators since we refuse to purge the GOP of the scum.

169 posted on 12/26/2011 12:13:47 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Thank you. See #169. I have no computer savvy and do nhot know how to save or re-post. I am an IBM Selectric II writer trapped in a computerized world.


170 posted on 12/26/2011 12:18:33 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: xzins

YES!!!


171 posted on 12/26/2011 12:24:19 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj; DoughtyOne; Windflier; xzins
Electing the Mittwit will guarantee exactly the same future. He would have great influence over the GOP House and Senate caucuses (which are spineless enough already).

When I was in high school (just before our scientists invented the wheel) we had a football chant: "Kick 'em, stomp 'em, step on their heads." That also applies to the Mittwit and his sycophants: One step at a time (with maximum gusto!).

172 posted on 12/26/2011 12:33:48 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I have no computer savvy and do nhot know how to save or re-post. I am an IBM Selectric II writer trapped in a computerized world.

Not to pick on you, but here's how that sounds: "I have no telephone savvy, and do not know how to dial a number, but I can answer a phone."

The keystrokes and mouse clicks required to save, then re-post your work, are embarrassingly simple to perform. It's actually more work to explain how to do it. You really ought to get someone to show you how it's done.

If you can handle an IBM Selectric II, you're already over-qualified to handle the basic functions on a computer.

173 posted on 12/26/2011 7:13:05 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the response. Let me nose around a bit and I’ll return with some figures.


174 posted on 12/27/2011 8:35:48 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Santorum..., are you giving it some thought? I knew you would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

b


175 posted on 12/31/2011 1:46:22 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=2824748%2C18

Go to the above link.


176 posted on 03/21/2012 11:48:03 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson