Posted on 11/30/2011 8:52:31 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
>>>You really are a delusional Paul-tard! <<<
How so, Obamatard?
>>>You post that Beck is lying...then when the point is proven<<<
Have you bothered to read my original post? I don’t think so. If you did you would know that Beck lied by omission.
Okay, maybe I am giving you too much credit for being intelligent. My apologies.
That is probably me spitting my coffee all over my keyboard from reading the last few pots on this thread. You guys should take this show on the road.
I was sort of wondering what CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES your buddy is talking about...ours, or Article 48 of the constitution of the Weimar Republic of Germany...
posts
He’s not my buddy, I can assure you.
I have no idea what he’s blithering about.
>>>Paul DOES add numerous earmarks to Bills and then votes against those bills.<<<
Right. Paul should have allowed Bush and Obama to get that money to spend it in any way they deem necessary for their political survival.
You are brilliant.
He don’t either.
Hey phil! Which sect of Judaism do you claim for yourself, dude? De-form?
LMAO!
RonPaul was one of the five Republicans to vote to repeal DADT. He specifically thinks faggots have the right to be in the military. I posted an article quoting him supporting faggots in the military on FR on a thread yesterday.
That alone makes him unacceptable; of course there are a host of other reasons; his 9/11 trooferism, his abortion being a states’ rights issue, and his love affair with weirdos like Code Pinkos and Cynthia McKinney and numerous other over the edge into the abyss type people.
Paul followers - Ronulans.
Hey, that ain’t bad.
Hey, that ain’t bad!
Thanks for the Haase and Barry music links. OUTSTANDING!
Beck is very wrong on this, and is the real hypocrite, because he ignores the structure of the system and the fact that most of Paul’s earmarks cause the funds to go to better purpose than they otherwise would.
Paul is one of very few congressmen that has worked to end all earmarks. That means nothing to Beck.
Paul is not suited to the presidency, but he is tops in congress.
>> “Simply stated, earmarks are the currency of corruption on Capitol Hill.” <<
.
No, really that is not true.
The currency of corruption is the entitlements; the earmarks amount to less than one thousandth of the total budget, and most voters aren’t even aware of the earmark expenditures.
>> “Paul IS the earmark king of congress, it is a fact, it is a given.” <<
You’re dwelling in ignorance.
The saga of Ron Paul and earmarks goes back to the ‘80s. From his first days in congress he has been the most avid fighter against allowing earmarks in the house. Calling hin the earmark king is a tougue-in-cheek joke, because he is constantly attempting to insert language into bills to block all earmarks.
Beck is well aware of this and that is why he is a huge hypocrite and a liar.
Peter schiff exposed beck and gold line a long time ago.
LOL. I had to see what you were talking about there. There is usually a good shot to see those types of posts from me on a late Friday or Saturday night when the single malt kicks in.
Looks like I was in a John Barry type of mood. That explains why I had James Bond themes running through my head all day Sunday.
Sorry honey but he was given that title by congress. Paul does a great dance, he puts in his earmarks when he knows a bill is going to pass then votes against the bill.
I do not know whether Beck has ever said Paul is an earmark king, I do not listen to Beck. I know that Paul is because of other sources.
What I do know without a doubt is that many Paul supporters have know idea who he really is, a;; they know is who they think/what he is.
It is as I stated, the handle was given in jest because he is known for his vendetta against earmarks.
Trying to whitewash Beck is a waste of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.