The Cain Train is not derailed by bottom feeders.
...and we all know how Paula, Juanita & Kathleen used to hug Bill at Campaign events.
The only relevant story in all this is how the left will do anything to stop independent thinking, especially among black people—and how they will commit the most extreme moral crimes in order to accomplish their goal.
At this point, I can practically guarantee you that this women is suffering from some sort of mental illness and has probably been seeing a therapist for a decade or more.
I know EXACTLY what kind of woman she is, someone a couple of posts up hit the nail on the head calling her a two bagger. This is the kind of crazy middle aged skank ho, that sleazy middle aged men use then toss away like toilet paper because no matter how much she puts out, she is so freaking nuts it doesn’t matter. But from 20 feet she looks sort of hot, and makes a little man look like a big shot at a party, and it’s a guaranteed lay at the end of the night, followed quickly by the man escaping from her room filled with teddy bears or unicorns or whatever her particular obsession is.
*shiver*
this woman needs serious psychological help, and Gloria Alred should be ashamed to have exploited such an obviously deranged individual in such a public way.
This isn’t a “Bill Clinton” moment. It is the REAL Clarence thomas. Specific? Let me give you speicific: Coke can.
This is rather odd. Witness: Cain accuser hugged him during Tea Party meeting a month ago http://tinyurl.com/7kf2tbc
Sadly true. I was very offfended by the comparisons with Thomas, because first of all, there was no paper trail (Cain actually had two employment complaints against him) and the allegations were more than tenuous. Also, I don’t like the race card that Cain is playing: he is not being attacked for being black, and any white GOP candidate with that track record would have had exactly to answer exactly the same questions. He knew what was in his past and he should have been prepared to answer when he became a candidate.
But the sad thing is that GOPers are acting exactly like the Dems when Bill was accused: trashing the women, saying all women are liars, and if it really happened, it was all “just about sex” anyway. It’s actually about honesty and trustworthiness - and judgment, none of which I would say are possessed by Cain.
So, if a gold digger makes an accusation, it must be true.
Why all the Clinton comparisons when we have a better, more recent example to compare it to? Sharon Bialik is the Larry Craig of the 2012 election. Until her story is vetted, she shouldn’t be taken any more seriously than the media wanted us to take Larry Craig’s story.
What I want to know is if this woman continued talking to Cain after his alleged groping.
Cain’s toast
But unless and until we see corroborating evidence, and considering the long standing habit of the major press organs to invent stories and lie, I will take Mr. Cain at his word. Not just because his current known accuser is a plasticized serial bankrupt in desperate need of money (isn't the Internet a wonder?) but because the accusations are at odds with everything else that is known or can be perceived in the man's character.
That's not to say we can't be entirely wrong about a person's character. We only have to look as far as State College, PA this week to see that someone everybody thought a pillar of the community was and is in fact a monster. But pending some evidence of wrong doing I'm still more on the Cain Train than not.
“What was previously a smattering of anonymous sexual harassment accusations has now become a very specific allegation of sexual assault.”
Sexual assault? She claims he made a pass at her. Except for black conservatives, that is not normally referred to as sexual assault. If it actually happened, it would be best described as “attempted adultery.”
This smear attempt is so clumsy and transparent I can’t imagine anyone believing it.
You’re kidding, right Dave? The anonymous accusers are now free to speak but won’t. Of the public accusers, Sharon Bialek is telling an unprovable story and based on her background has overwhelming credibility issues, including a strong money motive. The other “accusations” on the table don’t rise above salacious innuendo.
If you’ve never been subjected to a defamation campaign, you may not realize how easy this is to do. I had a dispute with my neighbor about a garbage dumpster. My efforts to document misuse of that dumpster were transformed into a slanderous innuendo campaign shockingly devoid of truth, and conducted by two or three people who had no reason whatsoever to thus debase themselves over a nobody like me. But they did.
Whereas Cain finds himself on a national stage, threatening to disrupt the preordained GOP nomination process, and suddenly there appears this unconvincing parade of bomb throwers who have no evidence and incoherent stories that conform neither to Mr. Cain’s established reputation nor even to the internal structure of their own stories.
In the end, the public will be the judge, but no judge I know would give such substanceless charges the time of day.
This family is on the Cain Train and what he says is true, once you are on that Train you don't drop off.
He has the 2 votes from this household. We have the bumper sticker on our car. Although the car is broken down in the front yard today, the sticker gives it a classy look.
I agree, but there are a lot of koolaid drinkers on here who think it’s ok if Cain does it, but not ok when Clinton and other Democrats did it.