Other comments (paraphrased):
"This jury had an unreasonable expectation of forensics...their verdict was not based on looking at the evidence...it wasn't that couldn't look at the evidence, they didn't look at it...they were not being reasonable in what they can see and should see...there was no ability to determine the cause of death because of the decomposition, Casey should not have been rewarded for that and she was (rewarded)...I cannot believe they looked at the same case as the rest of us...this isn't the media's fault, it's the jury's fault."
Maybe the law needs to be changed so that reasonable doubt cannot include when a defendant himself/herself creates the very reasonable doubt which, in the end, gets them off.
Reasonable doubt should have to come about on its own, not because the defendant helped to actively create it.
For example, the very fact that Casey failed to report the child missing for 30 days created a situation where she increasingly would be most likely to be found NOT GUILTY at trial.
Why? Because during those 30 days the human remains are subject to rain, which can and will wash fingerprints away and its during this time that other valuable forensic evidence can be lost, due to animal activity and so forth.
IMO, this alone requires her being guilty of a charge(s) more serious than merely lying to a law enforcement official(s).
My brain is still reeling. I’m particularly amazed by the reaction of the alternate juror who chose to speak publicly. He tells us that somehow- in a feat of mental gymnastics usually performed only by liberals, that the explanation for the duct tape was the way the Anthony family buried their pets. Duct tape was wrapped around plastic bags before pets were buried, therefore that’s what happened with Caylee. UTTERLY ignoring the fact that the duct tape was put across Caylees FACE, not the outside of the garbage bag.
Well that alternate that gave out his name for his 5 min, is proof positive they were all functioning idiots.
Wow. What a statement. Thanks for sharing.
YAY MARK FURHMAN!! Tellin’ it like it is.
Pinellas County LIBERAL IDIOTS. I just can’t say that enough, LOL!!
Thanks so much for all your pings—Mark Fuhrman is right! Also found the comments by Cindy’s own brother incredibly thought provoking. Been out of town all day, just getting home, and it looks like the karma is hitting the fan. Wonder how these jurors will feel once it’s known that she was certainly guilty of at least the manslaughter or child abuse charges, and they just let her walk. Double jeopardy prevents re-trying this, and no one with standing will likely take her to civil court.