[CharacterCounts]

Did you miss the part where I mentioned the Prosecutor and the defense has ample opportunity to get rid of stupid jurors?

If you can't present a case sufficient to convince even a few of these jurors, either your factual case, your presentation, or both are lacking.

Jurors don't lose cases, lawyers do.

And, second guessing the motives of jurors you know nothing about is beyond stupid.

[don-o]

if you can't present a case sufficient to convince even a few of these jurors, either your factual case, your presentation, or both are lacking.

Give that man a big ceegar!!! Exactly the point I have been making on other threads.

[truthkeeper]

Prosecution tried 3 times to peremptory challenge Ms. "I can't judge people" Juror #4. The Judge wouldn't let them.

Sorry, society is dangerously dumbed-down. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

[truthkeeper]

And, second guessing the motives of jurors you know nothing about is beyond stupid.

Try that on someone else. I watched every minute except the first few days, and then I went back and read up on that testimony. So essentially I saw ALL the same evidence.

Sorry, stupid Obama jury. And next year we get to deal with them again at election time.