[Las Vegas Ron]

OK, the new standard is that unless there is a witness or direct DNA evidence it is open season for murderers.

Well, yeah....it's called BEYOND a reasonable doubt. Sorry, but the prosecution did not meet its burden.

Would you prefer it to be another standard?

Would you like people to be convicted because of the preponderance of the evidence or should it be a conviction based on facts in evidence?

Who knew there are active(proud) Freepers (read libertarians) as stupid and amoral as the Jerry Springer Jury seemed to be.

You can stick that comment up your ass.

You think you're so frekin moral you want to convict someone on your emotions and not facts....PFFFFT!

Did a murderess walk?

I don't know and neither do you, but lock the bitch up anyway cause you think it's right....got it.

[Mmogamer]

No just let her go, and kill another child that becomes inconvenient.

[central_va]

Would you prefer it to be another standard?

YES YES YES! How did ANYONE ever get convicted BEFORE there was DNA? EVERYONE one of those past convictions are false? Stick that up your arse.

[central_va]

Jackwagon did you watch ANY of the trial? The defense only gave one explanation for the little girls death, drowning. And they never claimed she had nothing to do with it. Did we see the same trial?

You know what a definition of a Libertarian is? That is somebody that thinks it is ok to build a whorehouse across from an elementary school next to a liquor store. I also find most Libertatians are ok with the existence of nambla in a philosophical sense.